» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: IanWinn on 12/16/05 at 7:29 pm

Full Story Here

WASHINGTON - The Senate on Friday refused to reauthorize major portions of the USA Patriot Act after critics complained they infringed too much on Americans' privacy and liberty, dealing a huge defeat to the Bush administration and Republican leaders.
ADVERTISEMENT

In a crucial vote early Friday, the bill's Senate supporters were not able to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster by Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., and Larry Craig, R-Idaho, and their allies. The final vote was 52-47.

President Bush, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales and Republicans congressional leaders had lobbied fiercely to make most of the expiring Patriot Act provisions permanent.

They also supported new safeguards and expiration dates to the act's two most controversial parts: authorization for roving wiretaps, which allow investigators to monitor multiple devices to keep a target from evading detection by switching phones or computers; and secret warrants for books, records and other items from businesses, hospitals and organizations such as libraries.

Feingold, Craig and other critics said those efforts weren't enough, and have called for the law to be extended in its present form so they can continue to try and add more civil liberties safeguards. But Bush, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist and House Speaker Dennis Hastert have said they won't accept a short-term extension of the law.

If a compromise is not reached, the 16 Patriot Act provisions expire on Dec. 31, but the expirations have enormous exceptions. Investigators will still be able to use those powers to complete any investigation that began before the expiration date and to initiate new investigations of any alleged crime that began before Dec. 31, according to a provision in the original law. There are ongoing investigations of every known terrorist group, including al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Islamic Jihad and the Zarqawi group in Iraq, and all the Patriot Act tools could continue to be used in those investigations.

Snipped!

2nd Story Here

Snipped to this point:  "None of us wants it to expire, and those who threaten to let it expire rather than fix it are playing a dangerous game," said Sen. Patrick Leahy, a Vermont Democrat.

*****************

Here's their point:  "We don't give a rat's @$$ about your rights; we're going to continue to abuse you and yours under color of law, and you'll like it!"

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 12/16/05 at 9:04 pm

Uncle Joe would tell us we're making things too complicated authorizing the government to break into your home and search your personal affects when you are NOT there.  Stalin would advise the government to break into your home when you ARE there, and take YOU away!  No warrant needed, just an anonymous tip-off from your neighbor, boss, co-worker, daughter...
::)

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: GWBush2004 on 12/16/05 at 9:24 pm

Most of the patriot act is uncontroversial and supported by near everyone, including me.

But there are, I think it's 16, provisions that are blantly unconstitutional, unamerican and should expire.  That's what the democrats and some republicans blocked today.  I hope we will let those parts die, but I imagine they'll get a three month or one year extension until some hearings can be had.

Again, just because some Muslim extremists flew planes into the world trade center doesn't make the fourth amendment to the United States constitution void.

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: IanWinn on 12/17/05 at 12:56 am

And you KNOW that Muslims flew planes into the Twin Towers because....?

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: GWBush2004 on 12/17/05 at 12:01 pm


And you KNOW that Muslims flew planes into the Twin Towers because....?


And you KNOW that Muslims didn't fly planes into the twin towers because......?

I'm not going to get into the tinfoil hat theories.

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: Don Carlos on 12/17/05 at 2:04 pm

Even if this stuff does expire, and the FBI can't do this stff, the job will be shifted to the NSA (No Such Agency, as it was called).  He11's bells, they are probably already doing it.

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 12/17/05 at 2:36 pm


And you KNOW that Muslims flew planes into the Twin Towers because....?

There's been huge amounts of buzz about this on the internet, including on this board.  My contention is the the scientific studies of the attack, explosions, and collapse don't jibe with the "official version."  There are also multiple unanswered questions about the way the authorities handled the aftermath that make the official version suspicious.  I'm neither ready to conclude it was an inside job nor dismiss puzzling evidence as "tinfoil hat" theories.
The 9/11 massacres are like the JFK assassination.  We the people (well, some of us) want the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth...and we're never gonna get it.

IMO, the USA PATRIOT act should be repealed immediately and new legislation--more open and consensual--should be enacted.

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: IanWinn on 12/17/05 at 11:35 pm

Re:  the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7, I refer you to Steven E. Jones, Professor of Physics at BYU, who demonstrates that it was explosives that brought down those buildings.  Read about it here:

http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html

Re:  the PATRIOT Act, I agree with you in that is should be repealed.  However, I believe that it should be replaced with nothing.  We don't need it, or anything else that gives government power to snoop into our snail-mail, email, homes, wallets, or lives.

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: Don Carlos on 12/18/05 at 3:38 pm

CNN conducted an informal poll on the Patriot Act today.  Should it become permanant, or something like that.  9% thats nine% of those who responded said yes.  NINTY ONE% said NO.  At least some of the people have spoken.  Do you think Lil' Georgie and his cabal are listening?

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: GWBush2004 on 12/18/05 at 4:06 pm


Re:

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: IanWinn on 12/18/05 at 5:32 pm

First off, the above URL is not something I wrote.  It was written by a physics professor.  You didn't read it, obviously.  I'll condense it for you:  The planes that hit the Twin Towers did NOT cause enough heat damage to cause the buildings to collapse (the steel columns that were used to support the building were rated to stand 2000oF for 2 hours before deformation would even start, but the fires from the planes were out in about 20 minutes); All three buildings (the Twin Towers and WTC7 - which was NOT hit by anything, much less a airplane) collapsed into their own footprint, and the only way that such a thing will happen is if controlled demolitions are used; multiple witnesses who were in and around the buildings stated that they heard explosive charges detonating before AND after the planes hit; video footage at the above website will show the effects of explosive charges detonating, including straight, horizontal streams of pulverized concrete and powdered metal ejecting from the sides of the buildings as they collapse; thermite charges were used to further weaken the support columns, and the proof is in the pictures of heavy machinery lifting pieces of metal from the ground that have yellow- to white-hot sections; the concrete used in the buildings was pulverized into fine powder, and you don't get that from a simple collapse, but from the application of explosives.  But don't take my word for it.  GO READ THE MAN'S PAPER AND POINT OUT WHERE HE IS WRONG, unless you are such a worshipper of Duh-bya and his chicken-hawks that you'll gladly grab your ankles for him and offer him a choice of KY Jelly or Vaseline.

Secondly, I looked through Snopes, and I couldn't find anything.  Maybe you'd be kind enough to post the URL.  My thanks if you do.

Sorry to be in such a crappy mood, but when I argue with someone, I like them to point out facts, not just say, "Well, I read it on Snopes", as if Snopes were gospel.  Thank you for your patience.

Subject: Re: Senate refuses to renew Patriot Act...BUT.....!

Written By: MaxwellSmart on 12/19/05 at 6:56 pm


So the planes flying into the world trade centers where what?

Check for new replies or respond here...