» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society
Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Custom Search
This is a topic from the Current Politics and Religious Topics forum on inthe00s.
Subject: Republicans: In favor or against doctor/patient privacy?
Written By: ChuckyG on 02/25/05 at 12:01 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/national/25kansas.html?ei=5094&en=590ef6d0a42ee0af&hp=&ex=1109394000&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1109340270-UWZmm5JwQzQvxTVfgCER7g
I'm asssuming it's ok for your records to be public, so long as you don't host a talk show.
Subject: Re: Republicans: In favor or against doctor/patient privacy?
Written By: danootaandme on 02/26/05 at 8:45 am
We knew this would happen eventually. The republican administrations do tend to give lip service
to keeping government out of private lives of, but they do tend to qualify their idea as to who
has he right to a private life and who doesn't.
Subject: Re: Republicans: In favor or against doctor/patient privacy?
Written By: MaxwellSmart on 02/26/05 at 5:52 pm
Republicans in re: anything to do with medicine:
They are in favor of or against whatever the insurance and pharmaceutical lobbies tell them be in favor of or against.
>:(
Subject: Re: Republicans: In favor or against doctor/patient privacy?
Written By: Don Carlos on 02/26/05 at 6:05 pm
Oh-my-God, are you suggesting that Rerard... I mean Repubs adhere to a double standard? Perish the thought. You have to understand that Rush's records should be sealed because some over-zelouse dem wants to persecute him for "doctor shopping" to get pain killers - no big deal. But we need to send away young womean who opt for abortions after the legal time limit has expired. Don't you see that there is a big difference between Rush's personal choices and those of some teenage slut who got knocked up? Rush, after all, has the truth (and lots of money and high powered lawyers), what does some little fluzzie have going for her? And why should we care (he asks in sarcasm)?