
» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society
Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Custom Search
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Sister Morphine on 03/28/06 at 4:35 pm
EDITED.
Where you directing that statement to me in the sentence I've highlighted to bold?
Was your name in it? That would be a no.
That statement is directed to anyone who really thinks Wacko Jacko the Kiddie Diddler is innocent.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Donnie Darko on 03/28/06 at 4:36 pm
EDITED.
Where you directing that statement to me in the sentence I've highlighted to bold?
I'm not sure if he's actually molested children. He's definitely troubled, but I don't think they had enough evidence to convict him, based on what I know.
Even if he is, that doesn't mean "Billie Jean" isn't genius.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Mr Tumnus on 03/28/06 at 5:02 pm
Was your name in it? That would be a no.
That statement is directed to anyone who really thinks Wacko Jacko the Kiddie Diddler is innocent.
OK but I think your trying to save 'face' again by saying that. You do come across as incredibly juvenile
I posted in this thread (which was months old and buried beneath stacks of threads btw) simply because I felt it was a pertinent and relevant thread to post the studio link in - incase any photography lovers or fans wanted to check it out...there are actually some here!
You have to understand madam I don't post about my days out simply to illicit yet another beligerent response from you. Have you got that. I hope so.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Sister Morphine on 03/28/06 at 5:07 pm
OK but I think your trying to save 'face' again by saying that. You do come across as incredibly juvenile
I posted in this thread (which was months old and buried beneath stacks of threads btw) simply because I felt it was a pertinent and relevant thread to post the studio link in - incase any photography lovers or fans wanted to check it out...there are actually some here!
You have to understand madam I don't post about my days out simply to illicit yet another beligerent response from you. Have you got that. I hope so.
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't read through all 57 pages of this thread before I posted. I didn't know how old the thread was when I posted. I just saw that there was a new post in this thread and I posted my opinion. My comment had nothing to do with anything that was to do with art. I didn't even read the posts on the page when I posted my opinion. My comment had nothing to do with any art gallery or any photographs........I don't care about any art gallery or photographs of Michael Jackson. All I did was post my opinion on whether or not I thought he was guilty. It had nothing to do with you or your post.
God damn.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Mr Tumnus on 03/28/06 at 5:13 pm
What the hell are you talking about? I didn't read through all 57 pages of this thread before I posted. I didn't know how old the thread was when I posted. I just saw that there was a new post in this thread and I posted my opinion. My comment had nothing to do with anything that was to do with art. I didn't even read the posts on the page when I posted my opinion. My comment had nothing to do with any art gallery or any photographs........I don't care about any art gallery or photographs of Michael Jackson.
God damn.
So why post in the thread at all..you idiot.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Sister Morphine on 03/28/06 at 5:14 pm
So why post in the thread at all..you idiot.
Because I was posting my opinion on whether I thought Michael Jackson was guilty or not. This thread is not about an art gallery, is it? Because I don't see that in the thread title anywhere. YOUR POST was about an art gallery and the photographs contained therein. I was commenting about the topic of the thread.
By the way, calling me an idiot for misunderstanding the point of my original post makes you look as juvenile as you think I am.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Mr Tumnus on 03/28/06 at 5:24 pm
REPOSTED - AGAIN
Whatever the truth is - Michael Jackson is an enduring entertainer and I will always love his music. Yesterday I went to the photographic gallery of HARRISON FUNK and LYNN GOLDSMITH in London - who are Michaels official publicity photographers, man they had some spectacular photos, also lots of pics of other musicians like BOB DYLAN, THE SMITHS and artist ANDY WARHOL etc ..but all the MJ ones were well out of my price range, upwards of
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: twistedwarp on 03/29/06 at 6:21 pm
hes guilty come on everybody knows that
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Donnie Darko on 03/29/06 at 6:58 pm
hes guilty come on everybody knows that
He probably is, but I don't think they had enough proof to prosecute him, based on what I know.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Zoso on 04/01/06 at 5:54 am
He should give Quincy Jones and Rod Temperton a call and make another album. I don't care about the trail. I could look past that if he made another album like Thriller.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: STAR70 on 04/01/06 at 2:46 pm
hes guilty come on everybody knows that
he now lives in Bahrain. everybody relax
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: No way! on 04/02/06 at 3:59 pm
he now lives in Bahrain. everybody relax
Except of course the little boys in Bahrain :o
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Marian on 04/02/06 at 4:09 pm
Robbo was some pedophile-supporter we had in here a while ago.
He was real easy to spot too. You see, he was so ashamed of his "hero", that he would never sign in as anything but a guest. And he was always changing his name.
Ya know, I wonder if this should be moved to the "Politics" section, because of the "contriversial" nature of Michelle Jackson and it's crimes?
It's MICHAEL,not MICHELLE!
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Philip Eno on 04/02/06 at 4:11 pm
It's MICHAEL,not MICHELLE!
Michelle Jackson is somebody else, and libel laws might come into action here.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Marian on 04/02/06 at 4:59 pm
Michelle Jackson is somebody else, and libel laws might come into action here.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Sister Morphine on 04/02/06 at 5:01 pm
It's MICHAEL,not MICHELLE!
He dresses like a woman, looks like a woman, talks like a woman.......I think we can call him Michelle.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Philip Eno on 04/02/06 at 5:02 pm
He dresses like a woman, looks like a woman, talks like a woman.......I think we can call him Michelle.
To me, he will always be Michael
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Mr Tumnus on 04/02/06 at 5:06 pm
He dresses like a woman, looks like a woman, talks like a woman.......I think we can call him Michelle.
Maybe he dresses/looks like a woman to you - but one thing is for sure MJ is male and he'll never be a dyke!!
To me, he will always be Michael
MICHAEL JACKSON it sure is!!
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Zoso on 04/03/06 at 3:05 am
I'm personally ready to embrace a comeback from my favourite black man, MJ. If he teams up with Quincy Jones for another album, words could not describe how happy I'd be.
Subject: Re: Michael Jackson - guilty or not?
Written By: Mr Tumnus on 04/03/06 at 9:38 am
I'm personally ready to embrace a comeback from my favourite black man, MJ. If he teams up with Quincy Jones for another album, words could not describe how happy I'd be.
I had 'Off The Wall' on this am and there is a discussion on there with QUINCY JONES talking about his involvement and production of the album, plus there are 2 bonus tracks (original demos of 'Don't Stop till you get Enough' and 'Workin' Day and Night')