 |
These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.
Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.
This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.
This is a topic from the More Than a Decade forum on inthe00s.
Check for new replies or respond here...
Subject: A new way of defining generations and cusps (revised for 2018)
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 9:09 am
1961-1964: Boomer/X cusp
1965-1967: Older X
1968-1974: Core X
1975-1977: Younger X
1978-1982: X/Y cusp
1983-1986: Older Y
1987-1992: Core Y
1993-1996: Younger Y
1997-2001: Y/Z cusp
Please let me know your thoughts.
Subject: Re: A new way of defining generations and cusps (revised for 2018)
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/01/18 at 9:19 am
I really can't see this "Y/Z Cusp" lasting past 2000. And even 2000 isn't very "cuspy" like others say. I think everyone born in the 2000's is solely Z.
Subject: Re: A new way of defining generations and cusps (revised for 2018)
Written By: unicornic on 09/01/18 at 3:22 pm
I really can't see this "Y/Z Cusp" lasting past 2000. And even 2000 isn't very "cuspy" like others say. I think everyone born in the 2000's is solely Z.
This thread is gonna get locked, but I agree with you
Subject: Re: A new way of defining generations and cusps (revised for 2018)
Written By: unicornic on 09/01/18 at 3:33 pm
To continue on with my post, the youngest people I could think of that are part of the whole SJW vs. Alt-right drama are Jo-Ann Butler (SJW) and Stell Bell (Alt-right), both of which were born in 2001.
There doesn't really seem to be anyone younger than that in the whole ordeal.
According to what I have heard, most SJWs and Alt-righters seem to be either younger Millennials (1989-1996) or Y/Z cusps (1997-2001). Many of the members of groups (I have a feeling at least 75% of them) like Identity Evropa and Antifa were born somewhere around that time.
2001 is definitely a cusp, even though they aren't the "truest" cuspers - that would be someone born in 1999; they graduated after the 2016 election and Trump's inauguration but before tide pods and the Parkland shooting.
No they are not 'definitely' a cusp. Where did you get that from? 97% of articles and sources will say 2001 is gen Z. Nobody calls 2001 millennials anymore. Now 1995-2000 are the real y/z cusp because nobody can agree where they belong.
Subject: Re: A new way of defining generations and cusps (revised for 2018)
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/01/18 at 3:51 pm
No they are not 'definitely' a cusp. Where did you get that from? 97% of articles and sources will say 2001 is gen Z. Nobody calls 2001 millennials anymore. Now 1995-2000 are the real y/z cusp because nobody can agree where they belong.
Yeah, calling 2001 millennials was common a couple years ago, but it seems like the vast majority of people now finally agree they're Gen Z (or at least early Gen Z) so I think calling them a Y/Z cusp is outdated by now.
Anyway, this thread is definitely going to get locked so this might as well be my last post on here.