There are several exceptions I have to pacing: I shall elaborate ( skip this if you do not want to be offended ).

A: If there are not the correct number of syllables per line, you will get docked ( almost always )
B: If a song if badly misrhymed but has the correct number of syllables per line, you still will get docked on pacing ( again, almost always ).
C: I do not hold ANY grudges on pacing, like who submitted the parody, parody content, wrong artist/decade, etc.

1: If too much of TOS remains, then you will sometimes get docked a point for pacing ( rarely )
2: If you put ( chorus ) vs the typed chorus, and they differ, you probably will get a point docked for pacing
3: I do not dock people for mistyped words or duplicate words in a parody ( such as putting "with with" when you just meant to put one "with" ).
4: Especially on alternative era songs, if you do not include much of the " Oooh's, Yeah's and mmmm's " I will dock you on pacing because alot of these songs are incomplete without them, unless you specify that lyrics were read from a sheet, which will not have them.
5: If you parody the " instrumental parts " or mention breaks as well, that may up the pacing if say I'm stuck between a 4 or 5
6: Difficulty on a song may up the pacing/overall vote and rule number 1 is out of the question ( mostly raps qualify for this )
7: Leaving out parts of songs will almost always result in a pacing dock ( unless it's like a single word )
8: Stresses falling on the wrong syllable do not go against pacing.
9: If a parody is so horrible as for pacing, I do not vote it.
10 : The Song " A Horse With No Name " always gets a 555 from me, as I detest that song so much NO parody could be worse.
11. There are a few other songs that have major exceptions to pacing. The only one off the top of my head is " The 12 Days of Christmas ". Just deliver the bottom line ( the whole song isnt necessary to me, and to submit the last line only would technically qualify as a 1 for pacing since 11/12 of the song is missing  ).
12 and final. There are exceptions to most of these exceptions ( except Letter C and numbers 3, 5, and 10 ). Go figure.

There are several exceptions I have to pacing: I shall elaborate ( skip this if you do not want to be offended ).

A: If there are not the correct number of syllables per line, you will get docked ( almost always )
B: If a song if badly misrhymed but has the correct number of syllables per line, you still will get docked on pacing ( again, almost always ).
C: I do not hold ANY grudges on pacing, like who submitted the parody, parody content, wrong artist/decade, etc.

1: If too much of TOS remains, then you will sometimes get docked a point for pacing ( rarely )
2: If you put ( chorus ) vs the typed chorus, and they differ, you probably will get a point docked for pacing
3: I do not dock people for mistyped words or duplicate words in a parody ( such as putting "with with" when you just meant to put one "with" ).
4: Especially on alternative era songs, if you do not include much of the " Oooh's, Yeah's and mmmm's " I will dock you on pacing because alot of these songs are incomplete without them, unless you specify that lyrics were read from a sheet, which will not have them.
5: If you parody the " instrumental parts " or mention breaks as well, that may up the pacing if say I'm stuck between a 4 or 5
6: Difficulty on a song may up the pacing/overall vote and rule number 1 is out of the question ( mostly raps qualify for this )
7: Leaving out parts of songs will almost always result in a pacing dock ( unless it's like a single word )
8: Stresses falling on the wrong syllable do not go against pacing.
9: If a parody is so horrible as for pacing, I do not vote it.
10 : The Song " A Horse With No Name " always gets a 555 from me, as I detest that song so much NO parody could be worse.
11. There are a few other songs that have major exceptions to pacing. The only one off the top of my head is " The 12 Days of Christmas ". Just deliver the bottom line ( the whole song isnt necessary to me, and to submit the last line only would technically qualify as a 1 for pacing since 11/12 of the song is missing  ).
12 and final. There are exceptions to most of these exceptions ( except Letter C and numbers 3, 5, and 10 ). Go figure.


Thank you for ellaborating in such detail!!! How I figure it is I get TOS (if i've got it) and try to sing their words along to it. If I can't at all = 1, if I can in some parts but i'm lost in others = 2; if I can for the most part but there are still a good few errors = 3; if I can sing along to it with a few errors = 4 and if I can sing along to it flawlessly or with only a couple of minor errors = 5. I'm dead tight when it comes to marking pacing, though so if I get lost, i'll try to sing that part again, but if I continually get lost on that part of the song, it'll probably get a 4. I don't hold grudges against the authors/original songs. I do not vote on songs I don't know, as this could be seen as biased. And I ALWAYS leave a comment when i've voted, even if i've given a really low mark, so you can always tell what mark i've given

Red Ant and DAK (and btw, welcome back, DAK)

this is not patronising, just a truth:

only newbies give the voting system this much thought - wait a few months, then post me if you think I'm wrong


 

Red Ant and DAK (and btw, welcome back, DAK)

this is not patronising, just a truth:

only newbies give the voting system this much thought - wait a few months, then post me if you think I'm wrong



Truth to who?

I don't give much thought to the votes that I receive...but I give a LOT of thought to the votes that I give to other people...because I know that some people care about votes a lot.  But I don't just hand out 5s to make people happy, either.  There have been countless times that I have had to leave parody and come back...because I couldn't decide how to vote when I first read it.

And...I find it interesting to hear how and why peoply vote the way that they do.

And I'd hardly consider myself to be a newbie...

Interesting to hear people's rationales. 

I suspect that the explanations most of us would come up with with regard to our voting process, while they might end up looking like hard and fast rules, would simply represent our best attempt at explaining what is in practice a subjective process.

When I write a parody, I often end up making deliberate choices about how to pace things, usually depending on the way the reader is most likely to remember the song.  Many, many pop songs have varying pacing from one verse to the next, and unless the reader is a musician, or knows the song intimately (word-for-word), they will most often tend to hum the entire song to themselves according to the rhythm and pacing of the first (or predominant) verse.

There have been countless times that I've written parodies of songs I know fairly well, yet upon checking my pacing against the full set of lyrics, I found that I 'needed' to make adjustments to the pacing.  But does such perfectionism serve the reader?  Isn't the reader likely to hum the parody to himself/herself the same way I did when I wrote the intial draft from memory?

I'm working on a 'Sound of Silence' parody right now, and it's giving me fits because the pacing is irregular.  Sometimes, the pacing of the last line varies quite significantly from one verse to the next.  Sometimes, they sing two syllable words on three syllables ("a vision soft-ly-ee sleeping").  So should I use another 2 syllable word in the place of 'softly', and expect the reader to recall how it's sung?  Should I use 'going' and write it go-i-ing?  Or should I just use a 3-syllable word?  Oh, Lord -- if I don't make the right decision, the Pacing Police will dock me!

You can spend/waste all kinds of time worrying about whether someone's going to 'get' what you're trying to do when you write your parodies a certain way.  Which is another reason it just ain't worth getting bent out of shape about someone thinking your pacing or anything else about your parody is 'wrong' or 'lacking' or 'unsuccessful'.  Make the best choices you can, and leave it at that.

only newbies give the voting system this much thought

I just thought it would be interesting to see if the way I vote for parodies is similar to other peoples' techniques, and at least it gives people some insight as to when we vote for their songs, what we mean. I honestly don't really care how people vote for mine, I just wanted to know other author's opinions on the matter. Thanks for viewing yours anyway


I don't give much thought to the votes that I receive...but I give a LOT of thought to the votes that I give to other people...because I know that some people care about votes a lot. But I don't just hand out 5s to make people happy, either. There have been countless times that I have had to leave parody and come back...because I couldn't decide how to vote when I first read it.

I find it interesting to hear how and why peoply vote the way that they do.


Arwen, this is very much the case with me. I've voted people's parodies 444 and they've ended up getting quite annoyed/upset, yet as see 444 as a good vote (?). Ditto with the handing out of 555s aswell. Infact, because of this I think many people regard me as the tightest voter on the site!!! And as for your final comment, so true. In fact, that was the very reason I started up this thread, and I was very surprised to find that it hadn't been started before now! Thank you, Arwen

Truth to who?

I don't give much thought to the votes that I receive...but I give a LOT of thought to the votes that I give to other people...because I know that some people care about votes a lot.  But I don't just hand out 5s to make people happy, either.  There have been countless times that I have had to leave parody and come back...because I couldn't decide how to vote when I first read it.

And...I find it interesting to hear how and why peoply vote the way that they do.

I give alot of thought on PACING especially, since that is my number 1 goal ( a parody is not good to me unless I can SING IT OVER TOS WHILE IT'S PLAYING-that's generally what I do when I review my own submissions( although some of mine do not pace well )). I do not hand out 555 to others either all the time expecting them back. I thinks the comments are much more important and so far have left them all enabled ( no feedback=no improvement ). Humor and overall can be anything ( to me ). A few special examples: There was a tribute parody to Jonny Carson I voted 515 on, but recommended it SOT YEAR ( before I realized that had already been decided ). I have also voted ( twice ) a 551 on  " slam " parodies because to me they were well paced and funny, but overall I feel they are no good ( one I did myself, I voted it a 551 as well, and yes I sometimes vote my own parodies, ONCE, and not always a 555. ).Also if I DKTOS and like the subject I will wait untill some votes come in on pacing to rate the funny/overall. The ONLY things I do not find funny are r*pe/ped0philia/child molestestation parodies ( and a few others ). Gross/$sexual parodies do not bother me ( again, a FEW exceptions ).

There has only been one time I have voted 111 ( deserved ), a 311 ( little harsh ), 312 ( little harsh on pacing but the rest deserverd ) and 222 ( was generous on that vote ). Most of the time it's 444+.

In approx. 500+ parodies I have seen, I have only seen 2 REAL names who left their written down vote on a 111 ( which were undeserved IMHO ).

I can understand if you are offended at the humor/overall, I just wish people would respect the pacing, or not 111 vote to ruin a streak of 10+ 555 ( such as I saw recently ). I wouldn't be happy with a 511, but would respect the person more if they did that.

I'm glad that people do think about the votes some. :)

PS- If you think I put alot of time into the votes, you should see some of the comments. ;)

Interesting to hear people's rationales. 
When I write a parody, I often end up making deliberate choices about how to pace things, usually depending on the way the reader is most likely to remember the song.  Many, many pop songs have varying pacing from one verse to the next, and unless the reader is a musician, or knows the song intimately (word-for-word), they will most often tend to hum the entire song to themselves according to the rhythm and pacing of the first (or predominant) verse.


I agree. It's very hard when writing something to write it in a way that everybody can get. Like i've explained, I only do parodies of songs I have, so I can check up my lyrics with the real thing. The only thing I can suggest when I get 3s and 4s for pacing in this case, is that the readers are trying to remember the original by humming it or basing it on just the first verse.

I give alot of thought on PACING especially, since that is my number 1 goal ( a parody is not good to me unless I can SING IT OVER TOS WHILE IT'S PLAYING-that's generally what I do when I review my own submissions.
There has only been one time I have voted 111 ( deserved ), a 311 ( little harsh ), 312 ( little harsh on pacing but the rest deserverd ) and 222 ( was generous on that vote ). Most of the time it's 444+.
I can understand if you are offended at the humor/overall, I just wish people would respect the pacing, or not 111 vote to ruin a streak of 10+ 555 ( such as I saw recently ). I wouldn't be happy with a 511, but would respect the person more if they did that.
PS- If you think I put alot of time into the votes, you should see some of the comments. ;)


Again, I sing the parody over the tune of the original. I have voted 222 recently - that's my lowest I've ever gave. I think I voted one of your songs 5 1 3, because whilst it was immaculately paced, i didn't find it funny but it was very well written. It also annoys me when people vote 111 for no reason (as you may have guessed by recent events!!!) And you're comments - aaaaargh! You spend more time writing your comments than I do writing my parodies!!!  ;D Only joking! Thanx

Truth to who?

I don't give much thought to the votes that I receive...but I give a LOT of thought to the votes that I give to other people...



but as much as Red Ant and DAK do?

but as much as Red Ant and DAK do?




As was said before, some people are very sensitive about the votes they recieve, and as I said earlier, some people have got upset with me for giving them 4s, when I see a 4 as the equivalent of a B+. You've got to be careful what vote you give and who you're giving it out to

Wow... several days?!  :o I'll be lucky if I spend several hours on mine!  ;D
No, but seriously, I just wouldn't have the patience to write a rap parody - they're just far too complez because they're practically spoken which makes pacing extremely difficult.

I try, where I can to get a copy of TOS and sing the words wirtten to it. This is the case in both mine and other people's parodies. I suppose that's why it winds me up so much when I get 3s and below for pacing, because i've just sat there and sang my words to the original, and if I can do it, why can't everybody else?  ??? Wierd
Anyways, thanks Red Ant for posting, I was wondering how long it would take you to post!!!  :)



The several day ones are usually done in alittle here, alittle there(20-30 minutes average, more if I'm stuck on a certain part) I think it might be because of the themes I use(90% of the time it's anime).

There are several exceptions I have to pacing: I shall elaborate ( skip this if you do not want to be offended ).

A: If there are not the correct number of syllables per line, you will get docked ( almost always )
B: If a song if badly misrhymed but has the correct number of syllables per line, you still will get docked on pacing ( again, almost always ).
C: I do not hold ANY grudges on pacing, like who submitted the parody, parody content, wrong artist/decade, etc.

1: If too much of TOS remains, then you will sometimes get docked a point for pacing ( rarely )
2: If you put ( chorus ) vs the typed chorus, and they differ, you probably will get a point docked for pacing
3: I do not dock people for mistyped words or duplicate words in a parody ( such as putting "with with" when you just meant to put one "with" ).
4: Especially on alternative era songs, if you do not include much of the " Oooh's, Yeah's and mmmm's " I will dock you on pacing because alot of these songs are incomplete without them, unless you specify that lyrics were read from a sheet, which will not have them.
5: If you parody the " instrumental parts " or mention breaks as well, that may up the pacing if say I'm stuck between a 4 or 5
6: Difficulty on a song may up the pacing/overall vote and rule number 1 is out of the question ( mostly raps qualify for this )
7: Leaving out parts of songs will almost always result in a pacing dock ( unless it's like a single word )
8: Stresses falling on the wrong syllable do not go against pacing.
9: If a parody is so horrible as for pacing, I do not vote it.
10 : The Song " A Horse With No Name " always gets a 555 from me, as I detest that song so much NO parody could be worse.
11. There are a few other songs that have major exceptions to pacing. The only one off the top of my head is " The 12 Days of Christmas ". Just deliver the bottom line ( the whole song isnt necessary to me, and to submit the last line only would technically qualify as a 1 for pacing since 11/12 of the song is missing  ).
12 and final. There are exceptions to most of these exceptions ( except Letter C and numbers 3, 5, and 10 ). Go figure.


When I go by pacing, I'm more forgiving if I like what they did with the song.(5 usually,4 if it throws me off a bit, I rarely give 3s). But that's how I am when I rate, I have never given anything lower than 3s.

but as much as Red Ant and DAK do?




Stuart, I probably give more thoughts on my votes/comments than I do in an election ( since you are probably going to lose either way there ). Matter of fact I have gone back DAYS later in cases to explain a vote ( once was a 444 I gave that should have been 555, the other a 555 that should have been 534--matter of fact I recall YOU commenting on my comment on that one ). I do not expect to see 10+ 555's on every parody I submit, and of my 74 or so only maybe 8 have more than 8 votes ( I do have one with 7 555's and I believe you saw it ).

Also, I hardly ever vote on parodies with no comments enabled for several reasons:
1: No form of feedback as to how to improve the parody ( if it needed improvement )-though I understand why people like William Tong do not enable them.
2: It is nearly impossible to prove/disprove vote inflation on parodies with no comments enabled ( funny how some of those receive A LOT more votes towards 555 ).
3: Rating the parody is only one-tenth the fun. Comments on the parody are two-tenths. Reading someone elses work is the other 70%. But if you do not enable comments, then to me you are either:
A: Forgetful and forget to check the comment box
B: Write something that will lead to a HUGE backlash or a crapton of comments between parodists over something that has NOTHING to do with the parody.
C: Wasting everyone's time ( notable exception: William Tong ).

Now, that may seem a bit harsh and excessive. The ratings are to give HONEST FEEDBACK ON THE PARODY ( for the most part, flip back to page 3 for my exceptions on pacing ). I also almost always leave my written vote down as well in the comments for several reasons:
1: It proves ( to an extent ) that a certain vote came from you.
2: If another voting loss were to occur atleast you would still have that.
3: Although I do not give my real name here or on www.amiright.com, " Red Ant" IS my name here and if I think a parody is great I will let you know ( sometimes in GREAT detail ). Also, I have seen one so bad it didn't even qualify as a parody and I ragged the author to death for it, and of course all-inbetweens.

Now, I have done 3 parodies of Nirvana's R*pe Me, and 2 of them have been 111'd ( someone seems to dislike TOS and has no regards to the parody ). I just ask that people respect the pacing of a parody, because as many have mentioned, a 111 is almost meaningless, whereas a 411/511 shows a much higher level of maturity.

I know votes will be across the board on some parodies ( notable William Tong and especially PL's ( those are almost ALWAYS 111 or 555 )).

PS- This has been exhausted as far as I'm concerned, but has been fun since I have some mild writer's block at the moment. Will still leave a comment or 2 here if any responses are posted regaring my posts, but they will be short.

Stuart, I probably give more thoughts on my votes/comments than I do in an election ( since you are probably going to lose either way there ). Matter of fact I have gone back DAYS later in cases to explain a vote ( once was a 444 I gave that should have been 555, the other a 555 that should have been 534--matter of fact I recall YOU commenting on my comment on that one ). I do not expect to see 10+ 555's on every parody I submit, and of my 74 or so only maybe 8 have more than 8 votes ( I do have one with 7 555's and I believe you saw it ).

Also, I hardly ever vote on parodies with no comments enabled for several reasons:
1: No form of feedback as to how to improve the parody ( if it needed improvement )-though I understand why people like William Tong do not enable them.
2: It is nearly impossible to prove/disprove vote inflation on parodies with no comments enabled ( funny how some of those receive A LOT more votes towards 555 ).
3: Rating the parody is only one-tenth the fun. Comments on the parody are two-tenths. Reading someone elses work is the other 70%. But if you do not enable comments, then to me you are either:
A: Forgetful and forget to check the comment box
B: Write something that will lead to a HUGE backlash or a crapton of comments between parodists over something that has NOTHING to do with the parody.
C: Wasting everyone's time ( notable exception: William Tong ).

Now, that may seem a bit harsh and excessive. The ratings are to give HONEST FEEDBACK ON THE PARODY ( for the most part, flip back to page 3 for my exceptions on pacing ). I also almost always leave my written vote down as well in the comments for several reasons:
1: It proves ( to an extent ) that a certain vote came from you.
2: If another voting loss were to occur atleast you would still have that.
3: Although I do not give my real name here or on www.amiright.com, " Red Ant" IS my name here and if I think a parody is great I will let you know ( sometimes in GREAT detail ). Also, I have seen one so bad it didn't even qualify as a parody and I ragged the author to death for it, and of course all-inbetweens.

Now, I have done 3 parodies of Nirvana's R*pe Me, and 2 of them have been 111'd ( someone seems to dislike TOS and has no regards to the parody ). I just ask that people respect the pacing of a parody, because as many have mentioned, a 111 is almost meaningless, whereas a 411/511 shows a much higher level of maturity.

I know votes will be across the board on some parodies ( notable William Tong and especially PL's ( those are almost ALWAYS 111 or 555 )).

PS- This has been exhausted as far as I'm concerned, but has been fun since I have some mild writer's block at the moment. Will still leave a comment or 2 here if any responses are posted regaring my posts, but they will be short.


I rarely(if ever) vote on a song that doesn't have the comments enabled. Mainly because I like to leave comments(To let them know what I think) and secondly because it helps me remember if I voted on the song or not(If I haven't voted in awhile).

Stuart, I probably give more thoughts on my votes/comments than I do in an election ( since you are probably going to lose either way there ). Matter of fact I have gone back DAYS later in cases to explain a vote ( once was a 444 I gave that should have been 555, the other a 555 that should have been 534--matter of fact I recall YOU commenting on my comment on that one ). I do not expect to see 10+ 555's on every parody I submit, and of my 74 or so only maybe 8 have more than 8 votes ( I do have one with 7 555's and I believe you saw it ).

Also, I hardly ever vote on parodies with no comments enabled for several reasons:
1: No form of feedback as to how to improve the parody ( if it needed improvement )-though I understand why people like William Tong do not enable them.
2: It is nearly impossible to prove/disprove vote inflation on parodies with no comments enabled ( funny how some of those receive A LOT more votes towards 555 ).
3: Rating the parody is only one-tenth the fun. Comments on the parody are two-tenths. Reading someone elses work is the other 70%. But if you do not enable comments, then to me you are either:
A: Forgetful and forget to check the comment box
B: Write something that will lead to a HUGE backlash or a crapton of comments between parodists over something that has NOTHING to do with the parody.
C: Wasting everyone's time ( notable exception: William Tong ).

Now, that may seem a bit harsh and excessive. The ratings are to give HONEST FEEDBACK ON THE PARODY ( for the most part, flip back to page 3 for my exceptions on pacing ). I also almost always leave my written vote down as well in the comments for several reasons:
1: It proves ( to an extent ) that a certain vote came from you.
2: If another voting loss were to occur atleast you would still have that.
3: Although I do not give my real name here or on www.amiright.com, " Red Ant" IS my name here and if I think a parody is great I will let you know ( sometimes in GREAT detail ). Also, I have seen one so bad it didn't even qualify as a parody and I ragged the author to death for it, and of course all-inbetweens.

Now, I have done 3 parodies of Nirvana's R*pe Me, and 2 of them have been 111'd ( someone seems to dislike TOS and has no regards to the parody ). I just ask that people respect the pacing of a parody, because as many have mentioned, a 111 is almost meaningless, whereas a 411/511 shows a much higher level of maturity.

I know votes will be across the board on some parodies ( notable William Tong and especially PL's ( those are almost ALWAYS 111 or 555 )).

PS- This has been exhausted as far as I'm concerned, but has been fun since I have some mild writer's block at the moment. Will still leave a comment or 2 here if any responses are posted regaring my posts, but they will be short.


well said


I rarely(if ever) vote on a song that doesn't have the comments enabled. Mainly because I like to leave comments(To let them know what I think) and secondly because it helps me remember if I voted on the song or not(If I haven't voted in awhile).


I still vote on parodies that don't enable comments, although it isn't as fun and I don't vote on as many compared to the ones that do enable comments

I have once tried to create an intentional parodox in a parody I did called " Rate Me ( the worst parody in history ). A brief rundown:

In the forword I stated that I wanted to have to worst rated parody on amirght.com 's history ( which I didn't ).

I stated that it would be HORRIBLY MISSPELLED ( and it was ).

It was SERIOUSLY incomplete.

It changed almost NO words from the OS.

I broke over 13 rules of the English language in that parody.

Now, despite all this, I got SEVERAL 555's.( also got some 111's and stuff inbetween )

The point was to see how people would rate the PACING of the parody. By all standards, the most I would give that song is a 2 if submitted by someone else. I found it HILARIOUS and would have voted 5 funny/overall, giving a 255 vote.( I didn't vote it ).

Pacing should come first, and I do not believe anything like that can really get more than a 2 on pacing REGARDLESS of how funny it is ( there are people who agree and I've seen strange votes like 135, 155, and so on ).

I have once tried to create an intentional parodox in a parody I did called " Rate Me ( the worst parody in history ). A brief rundown:

In the forword I stated that I wanted to have to worst rated parody on amirght.com 's history ( which I didn't ).

I stated that it would be HORRIBLY MISSPELLED ( and it was ).

It was SERIOUSLY incomplete.

It changed almost NO words from the OS.

I broke over 13 rules of the English language in that parody.

Now, despite all this, I got SEVERAL 555's.( also got some 111's and stuff inbetween )

The point was to see how people would rate the PACING of the parody. By all standards, the most I would give that song is a 2 if submitted by someone else. I found it HILARIOUS and would have voted 5 funny/overall, giving a 255 vote.( I didn't vote it ).


I don't think I rated that one... i think i'll go have a look now, although I think i avoided it because I didn't know TOS

I have once tried to create an intentional parodox in a parody I did called " Rate Me ( the worst parody in history ). A brief rundown:

In the forword I stated that I wanted to have to worst rated parody on amirght.com 's history ( which I didn't ).

I stated that it would be HORRIBLY MISSPELLED ( and it was ).

It was SERIOUSLY incomplete.

It changed almost NO words from the OS.

I broke over 13 rules of the English language in that parody.

Now, despite all this, I got SEVERAL 555's.( also got some 111's and stuff inbetween )

The point was to see how people would rate the PACING of the parody. By all standards, the most I would give that song is a 2 if submitted by someone else. I found it HILARIOUS and would have voted 5 funny/overall, giving a 255 vote.( I didn't vote it ).


Owch..........I suppose it gave George Hamilinton IV a run for his money, but i still don't think it's the WORST parody ever written

Owch..........I suppose it gave George Hamilinton IV a run for his money, but i still don't think it's the WORST parody ever written


No, not by a long shot ( ESPECIALLY since it was INTENDED to be horrible ). As for giving GH IV a run for his money, I said in the comments it took 3 minutes to write it ( that is true-the forword took more time than the parody itself ) and his parodies for the most part look like the same amount of effort have been put into them.

PS- I have also tested the " Funny" category on the same OS, called " Date R*pe " ( and it is so unfunny that it cannot even be voted on as one person mentioned ).

PS- I have also tested the " Funny" category on the same OS, called " Date R*pe " ( and it is so unfunny that it cannot even be voted on as one person mentioned ).


Yeh, i red that one. At least you had the decency of actually telling people that it wasn't supposed to be funny. Bet you still got some 555s on it though

Yeh, i red that one. At least you had the decency of actually telling people that it wasn't supposed to be funny. Bet you still got some 555s on it though


DAK, you must have read the wrong parody or not noticed the votes as I just checked it. All 5 votes on the song have a unanimous 1 on funny. As one person said " You wrote an unvoteable parody, here Red Ant. " I find it so unfunny that I think giving a 1 on funny is TOO MUCH CREDIT. I will post my " vote " on it in the next few days.

DAK, you must have read the wrong parody or not noticed the votes as I just checked it. All 5 votes on the song have a unanimous 1 on funny. As one person said " You wrote an unvoteable parody, here Red Ant. " I find it so unfunny that I think giving a 1 on funny is TOO MUCH CREDIT. I will post my " vote " on it in the next few days.


Im sure i've read it, because on it you say 'It's not meant to be funny, it's serious' or something. Don't think i read the votes/comments though, or if I did, i've forgotten about them