Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Subject: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with sex
In the past I've been fairly leniant about what constitutes "too dirty". From today onwards, anything dealing with sexual topics will not get approved. In the past I would state that if it describes a sexual act, it's too filthy. At this point I'm sick of trying to determine what is too dirty, or trying to define what is acceptable and what isn't when dealing with sex. From now on, anything dealing with sex isn't considered appropriate and will not get approved.
I'm not removing stuff that's already been approved (unless I get several complaints about it that I think are justified).
You can expect that parodies dealing with homosexuality, or sex acts, or sexual organs, etc are not going online anymore. Find somewhere else to submit them or put them on your own personal site, I don't want them.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
D*mn! Just as we were putting the finishing touches on "Voyeurs, Cuffs and Honey" and were going to dedicate it to Johnny D..... ;)
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
you might want to put this on the front page....
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
you might want to put this on the front page....
End Quote
...or at least in the rules blurb on the submissions page.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Define "sex" ;D
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Out of curiosity, would a parody like "As queers go bi"-Michael Florio be accepted if submitted under these new rules? because I need to know where the fine line is...
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Fair enough...
(fx: sighs, and goes and scrubs a couple of probably-too-risque-anyway parodies from the to-be-submitted list)
Quoting:
I'm not removing stuff that's already been approved (unless I get several complaints about it that I think are justified).
End Quote
Don't blame you: it would take days going through Malcolm's alone ;-)
Phil
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
Out of curiosity, would a parody like "As queers go bi"-Michael Florio be accepted if submitted under these new rules? because I need to know where the fine line is...
End Quote
that would be fine. while it's refering to homosexuality, it's not anything that wouldn't be said on the six o'clock news.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
that would be fine. while it's refering to homosexuality, it's not anything that wouldn't be said on the six o'clock news.
End Quote
i.e. referring to the status is fine, but describing the act itself would be beyond the bounds of taste, so to speak...
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
D*mn! Just as we were putting the finishing touches on "Voyeurs, Cuffs and Honey" and were going to dedicate it to Johnny D..... ;)
End Quote
Aww, gee, thank you so much - I wish I could see that parody, M & P ! Maybe if I come up with a suitable Email address (temporary) you could send it to me? Or maybe Chucky could arrange something?
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
Define "sex" ;D
End Quote
dont ask Clinton
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
i.e. referring to the status is fine, but describing the act itself would be beyond the bounds of taste, so to speak...
End Quote
ah-ha I see...alright, Im in no danger with my newer ones...
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Must admit, I'm not sure whether to bowdlerise my in-progress "Sir Farqharlot" lyrics, or skip it as it's one that I'm writing for performance rather than submission...
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
Aww, gee, thank you so much - I wish I could see that parody, M & P ! Maybe if I come up with a suitable Email address (temporary) you could send it to me? Or maybe Chucky could arrange something?
End Quote
I think I'd be interested in seeing that one too..lol ;)
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Double entendre should still be open season, though? Eh Chuck, any thoughts on that that maybe the group should know? ???
I think you putting your foot down on this issue is a very good idea.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
Double entendre should still be open season, though? Eh Chuck, any thoughts on that that maybe the group should know? ???
I think you putting your foot down on this issue is a very good idea.
End Quote
yeah, that's ok... I said as much on one that was posted Sunday, but I'm sure not many people have seen it.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Can the original song be about sex as long as the parody isn't? I need to know this because I just wrote a parody called "I Want Your Chex," and I wanted to know before I submitted it.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
Can the original song be about sex as long as the parody isn't? I need to know this because I just wrote a parody called "I Want Your Chex," and I wanted to know before I submitted it.
End Quote
yeah that's fine
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Oh :( OK, thats okay, Ill just post my two Merry and Pips parodies on another site
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
What, we were gonna get two dirty parodies written for us? :o :D
Oooh, please email us a copy! ;)
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
:-X :-X :o >:( >:(darn!My best one has to do with sex(it's a parody of the Everlys'version of "Rip it Up")now it's too late to put it here!It's really funny,too!I guess that's what you get for procrastinating!Cheers!
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
If anyone wants a central location to just share the naughty ones (sorry, no cool features like Chucky offers,) I set up a quick and dirty Yahoogroup for that purpose. http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/wronglyrics Feel free to use it if you want.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
If anyone wants a central location to just share the naughty ones (sorry, no cool features like Chucky offers,) I set up a quick and dirty Yahoogroup for that purpose. http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/wronglyrics Feel free to use it if you want.
End Quote
Good idea, Melhi
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
If anyone wants a central location to just share the naughty ones (sorry, no cool features like Chucky offers,) I set up a quick and dirty Yahoogroup for that purpose. http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/wronglyrics Feel free to use it if you want.
End Quote
I checked it out, but when you get a Yahoo ID it requires you to fill out 'sex' and creates a profile that apparently shows your gender... So Pippin and I cannot use it... :'(
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
I checked it out, but when you get a Yahoo ID it requires you to fill out 'sex' and creates a profile that apparently shows your gender... So Pippin and I cannot use it... :'(
End Quote
Ahh... I had forgotten they'd changed to a forced selection on that one. I used to leave it (and several other questions) blank, myself.
You can subscribe to groups on yahoogroups by e-mail. When you do, you aren't a registered Yahoogroups member, so you can't access your subscription settings to make changes or view any of the members-only features on the group's section of the website (unfortunately, to cut down on spam, just about everything needs to be set to members-only access.) The listowner can make subscription setting changes for you, when you need them. To sub a group by e-mail, you'd send a blank e-mail to listname-subscribe@yahoogroups.com replacing "listname" with the name of the list. The correct e-mail subscription address is included on the first page of every group's section.
Chucky's keeping WhatFreaks open another year, so it's probably a moot point with the wronglyrics forum, but I thought I'd mention e-mail subs in case you ever want to join some other group without specifying gender, sometime. :)
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Folks, we all need to support Chucky G on this issue, big time!
This is an issue of cold hard business reality and Internet economics.
If we want Amiright to continue, Chucky needs to maintain and increase the traffic flow/number of hits/eyeball count of Amiright....advertising revenues depend on it.
If search engines and other entities currently listing links to Amiright flag and drop Amiright because of too much blatantly sexual content, the result would be less hits, less traffic, and, consequently, less advertising revenue to keep Amiright going and growing.
When Chucky instituted a no-sexual-topic-song-parody-policy, he didn't do it because he's a prude, he did it because he is shrewd....and we should support him in this. If search engines and other entities currently listing links to Amiright start dropping Amiright because they find too much blatantly sexual content here, that's bad for everyone who enjoys Chucky's excellent website.
I'm with you 100% on this, Chuck - thanks again for doing your best to maintain and increase Amiright's World Wide Web prominence.
And if that means an occasional song parody must be turned down due to too much blatantly sexual content, well, so be it !!
Thanks again,
Johnny D
(P.S. - But Chucky - please confirm for all us parody authors - that you will still consider posting parodies that are cleverly written to be able to be read as having a non-sexual meaning, i.e. well-written double-entendres that could, but do not have to be, read in a sex-related light.....thanks!)
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
Folks, we all need to support Chucky G on this issue, big time!
This is an issue of cold hard business reality and Internet economics.
If we want Amiright to continue, Chucky needs to maintain and increase the traffic flow/number of hits/eyeball count of Amiright....advertising revenues depend on it.
If search engines and other entities currently listing links to Amiright flag and drop Amiright because of too much blatantly sexual content, the result would be less hits, less traffic, and, consequently, less advertising revenue to keep Amiright going and growing.
When Chucky instituted a no-sexual-topic-song-parody-policy, he didn't do it because he's a prude, he did it because he is shrewd....and we should support him in this. If search engines and other entities currently listing links to Amiright start dropping Amiright because they find too much blatantly sexual content here, that's bad for everyone who enjoys Chucky's excellent website.
I'm with you 100% on this, Chuck - thanks again for doing your best to maintain and increase Amiright's World Wide Web prominence.
And if that means an occasional song parody must be turned down due to too much blatantly sexual content, well, so be it !!
Thanks again,
Johnny D
(P.S. - But Chucky - please confirm for all us parody authors - that you will still consider posting parodies that are cleverly written to be able to be read as having a non-sexual meaning, i.e. well-written double-entendres that could, but do not have to be, read in a sex-related light.....thanks!)
End Quote
Everybody - Chucky already responded to this on the "System Announcements" board - I highly recommend that everyone read his response - it's very clear, friendly, and informative!
Thanks Chuck!
Johnny D
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Quoting:
(P.S. - But Chucky - please confirm for all us parody authors - that you will still consider posting parodies that are cleverly written to be able to be read as having a non-sexual meaning, i.e. well-written double-entendres that could, but do not have to be, read in a sex-related light.....thanks!)
End Quote
yes, that's fine. As I point out in the System announcements board, I'm perfectly fine with a parody that can be read with a non-sexual meaning and still make sense.
The best example I can give is Olivia Newton-John's "Physical" (still a favorite of mine, listening to that album now as a matter of fact). On the surface it appears to be about working out, but reading a little more (and not a heck of a lot more) into the lyrics, realizes getting physical isn't about gym exercise but more intimate exercises.
It's a fine line to walk, and I'm pretty picky, but you're always welcome to send an email (with the rejected parody) to me and I'll try and point out something I think can be changed, etc. I'm more flexible than the movie rating boards in that I'll tell you what in particular is wrong.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
ChuckyG - I hadn't had time to get over and actually look at this before. I agree 100% with the policy and especially Johnny D's remarks. When I first got on I didn't even NOTICE the ads and had wondered how you financed this endeavor. I don't usually write stuff that's too raunchy, but I have penned a few. I usually only share those with close friends because I really have no desire to seriously offend anyone. It so happens I was wrestling with whether to post one that was more than a little bit beyond my normal limit the week-end you first instituted the new rule. I'm glad you did, I really wouldn't want to see that one on my "Author" list everytime I went there, would be a bit embarrassed. It doesn't bother me personally if someone posts rank stuff, I can just pass over it, but a larger audience might be turned off and go away completely. Thanks for the space.
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
Melhi,
I joined. I added my one parody that got bumped to WhatFreaks. It might have even gotten accepted now on amiright. It's very dirty ;D but nothing to do with sex.
Quoting:
If anyone wants a central location to just share the naughty ones (sorry, no cool features like Chucky offers,) I set up a quick and dirty Yahoogroup for that purpose. http://www.yahoogroups.com/group/wronglyrics Feel free to use it if you want.
End Quote
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
I guess its just a sign of the apparent end of Ghetto John......it seems those were the only parodies working for me. :-/ I dont know whats wrong with me.....oh well peace out guys. :)
Subject: Re: POLICY CHANGE: No more parodies dealing with s
don't leave G,
I didn't
and my parodies have been sucking big tyme.
Stay......
from S.T.G.