» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society
Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Custom Search
This is a topic from the Song Parodies forum on inthe00s.
Subject: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ChuckyG on 11/07/03 at 08:42 p.m.
I try my best to delete them before they get added to the site, but let's face it, when I'm only awake for five minutes before I start the review process, I don't have the greatest memory. If you see something that is clearly duplicated in either your profile or someone elses, give me the URL of the one to delete (both URL's if you think I should delete someone elses parody). Deleting parodies is very easy. Modifying them takes more work. Speaking of which, I just made some author name corrections and stuff, so if you asked for a change, it's been done.
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ruth46 on 11/10/03 at 10:55 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles60.shtml is an exact duplicate of http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles59.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johhny on 11/10/03 at 05:26 p.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles199.shtml should be deleted because it is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles200.shtml, and both have been around a couple months, but still..
When are you gonna take care of these, Chuck?
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ChuckyG on 11/10/03 at 07:51 p.m.
Quoting:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles199.shtml should be deleted because it is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thebeatles200.shtml, and both have been around a couple months, but still..
When are you gonna take care of these, Chuck?
End Quote
as soon as I know about them.. it's done
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johhny on 11/14/03 at 03:30 p.m.
Ah, I found another pair.
Please delete http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/billyjoel46.shtml because it is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/billyjoel47.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 11/17/03 at 08:42 a.m.
Over the weekend I found a whole bunch:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/georgeharrison9.shtml should be removed since it's a duplicate of http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/georgeharrison10.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/pinkfloyd96.shtml should be removed since it's a duplicate of http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/pinkfloyd97.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/bobbydarin3.shtml should be removed since it's a duplicate of http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/bobbydarin2.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Gary Main on 11/17/03 at 11:44 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional308.shtmlduplicate and titled wrong. thanks
Subject: wrong move
Written By: Gary Main on 11/17/03 at 11:55 a.m.
the real problem is the parody title and the song title are backwards. also title should be rest not bless
Quoting:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional308.shtmlduplicate and titled wrong. thanks
End Quote
Subject: please delete thanks
Written By: Gary Main on 11/18/03 at 01:14 p.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/paulmcartney2.shtml
Subject: Re: please delete thanks
Written By: Johhny on 11/18/03 at 02:11 p.m.
Quoting:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/paulmcartney2.shtml
End Quote
What's wrong with this one?
Subject: Please remove, as final versions are submitted. Th
Written By: Gary Main on 11/19/03 at 01:10 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional305.shtmlhttp://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/steelydan12.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/christmascarol8.shtmlhttp://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/bobandshirley0.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/christmascarol7.shtmlhttp://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/barrymanilow21.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional312.shtmlhttp://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/kimcarnes6.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/kidrockcherylcrow0.shtmlhttp://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/threedognight13.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional307.shtml
Subject: Re: Please remove, as final versions are submitted
Written By: ... on 11/19/03 at 08:41 a.m.
Quoting:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional305.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/steelydan12.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/christmascarol8.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/bobandshirley0.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/christmascarol7.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/barrymanilow21.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional312.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/kimcarnes6.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/kidrockcherylcrow0.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/threedognight13.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional307.shtml
End Quote
Did you like, revise these or something?
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Ellipsis on 11/20/03 at 08:23 a.m.
Guess what: http://amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional324.shtml is identical to http://amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional325.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Gary Main on 11/21/03 at 10:56 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional329.shtmlhttp://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/barrymanilow20.shtml
Final revisions posted, thanks for bearing with me, Gary
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Ethan Mawyer on 11/28/03 at 08:43 a.m.
this is a (almost) duplicate i want deleted because i forgot to put in revisions
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/simpleplan12.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johhny on 12/02/03 at 12:41 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thekinks5.shtml is identical to http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/thekinks6.shtml
Subject: Guess what, there's more..
Written By: ... on 12/05/03 at 08:21 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmclean37.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Gary Main on 12/08/03 at 07:06 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/deeppurple9.shtml
please remove duplicate. keep smiling!!
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 01/18/04 at 09:52 p.m.
Please remove http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/pearljam29.shtml because it is identical to http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/pearljam30.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: neminem on 01/21/04 at 00:12 a.m.
Hmm... as Chucky obviously checks this thread frequently, and probably when he's ready to fiddle with the database, I thought I'd remention something I'd like corrected: a song called It's Not Unusual (To Get Fragged By Everyone) got entered with my name capitalized, and therefore doesn't appear on my list of parodies. I sent an email a couple weeks ago, but I wouldn't be too surprised if it never got through, as my email's been acting weirdly for a while. Could you please fix this?
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ChuckyG on 01/21/04 at 07:03 a.m.
Quoting:
Hmm... as Chucky obviously checks this thread frequently, and probably when he's ready to fiddle with the database, I thought I'd remention something I'd like corrected: a song called It's Not Unusual (To Get Fragged By Everyone) got entered with my name capitalized, and therefore doesn't appear on my list of parodies. I sent an email a couple weeks ago, but I wouldn't be too surprised if it never got through, as my email's been acting weirdly for a while. Could you please fix this?
End Quote
actually, removing parodies is easy to do. Fixing them is a different story altogether. I'll try and do it this weekend if possible. I think I did get your email about it
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Will on 01/30/04 at 11:07 a.m.
Pact Breaker (parody of "Heartbreaker")
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/dionnewarwick0.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/dionnewarwick1.shtml
My Reward (parody of "My Sweet Lord")
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/georgeharrison1.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/georgeharrison5.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johhny on 02/02/04 at 01:00 p.m.
Please take away http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/thebeatles90.shtml because it's identical to http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/thebeatles91.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 02/04/04 at 08:47 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/bryanadams4.shtml is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/bryanadams5.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Jan Unwin on 02/04/04 at 09:01 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/bryanadams5.shtmlis a duplicate of
http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/bryanadams4.shtm
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Ellipsis on 02/04/04 at 02:50 p.m.
Quoting:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/bryanadams5.shtmlis a duplicate of
http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/bryanadams4.shtm
End Quote
Jan, I just posted that. Didn't you read my post (February 4th, 2004, 8:47am)?
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Jan Unwin on 02/04/04 at 09:03 p.m.
Ellipsis,
Nope, not until after I posted mine. Didn't mean to duplicate your post about duplications.
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Mr. X on 02/10/04 at 12:28 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/dtentboysfromthemotionpictureholes1.shtml is identical to http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/dtentboysfromthemotionpictureholes0.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: nally on 02/19/04 at 05:02 p.m.
I notice that there's a triplicate submission of one of today's parodies (that's right, there's three instances of a certain parody on the site. The URL that should be kept is http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/pink46.shtml ; the ones that should be deleted are http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/pink45.shtml and http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/pink47.shtml
Subject: please delete, thanks
Written By: raddog20002002 on 02/21/04 at 08:13 a.m.
www.amiright.com/parody/80s/genesis9.shtml
www.amiright.com/parody/80s/genesis10.shtml
www.amiright.com/parody/80s/genesis12.shtml
www.amiright.com/parody/80s/madness3.shtml
www.amiright.com/parody/90s/offspring17.shtml
www.amiright.com/parody/80s/falco4.shtml
www.amiright.com/parody/80s/hulkhogan0.shtml
:P
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: neminem on 02/21/04 at 06:08 p.m.
So... how about that Neminem song, by the way? It's still capitalized, and it's one of my better ones.
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Spaff.com on 02/23/04 at 08:22 a.m.
Yo Chucky - Pretty please, delete http://amiright.com/parody/misc/westsidestorycast0.shtml
Thanx
Spaff
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: K1chyd on 02/24/04 at 06:51 a.m.
Here´s my triggerhappy keyboard mistake to be taken away:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/robertlundspaffcom0.shtml
Thanx // Peter
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: raddog20002002 on 02/24/04 at 04:45 p.m.
Febuary 21, 2004 is the first time I have requested to have some of my parodies deleted. They have been added to the site and Rick D wrote a complaint to one of them. He was just trying to help me so I don't have three versions of the same parody, "My Nightmare On Elm Street." I am just worried about the mistakes I made on my parodies, which I wanted to have deleted. I just want to know how long it takes to have the parodies deleted after writing a request about it. Thank You
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ChuckyG on 02/24/04 at 06:30 p.m.
Quoting:
Febuary 21, 2004 is the first time I have requested to have some of my parodies deleted. They have been added to the site and Rick D wrote a complaint to one of them. He was just trying to help me so I don't have three versions of the same parody, "My Nightmare On Elm Street." I am just worried about the mistakes I made on my parodies, which I wanted to have deleted. I just want to know how long it takes to have the parodies deleted after writing a request about it. Thank You
End Quote
it usually doesn't take long, a day or two... the past two weeks have been very busy for me (and the rest of this week promises to be as well). I got to them tonight though. I'm going to try and do parody author bios tonight too.
Subject: Possible Duplicates of
Written By: Johnny_D on 02/25/04 at 07:44 p.m.
Hi Chucky,
Earlier today I was pressing PROCESS to submit a new parody called “Walrus Intrusion”, right when the Amiright server was apparently crashing!
I tried to submit it twice, at that time, both times getting – after a loooooonnnng pause – the “page cannot be found” screen.
Just a few minutes ago, I successfully submitted “Walrus Intrusion”.
If you happen to see multiple copies of “Walrus Intrusion” appear tomorrow when you do the reviews and postings, please delete all but one of them.
Thanks!
Johnny D
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: nally on 03/04/04 at 03:51 p.m.
I noticed another pair:
Please take away http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/kennyrogers0.shtml because it is an exact copy of http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/kennyrogers1.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Royce Miller on 03/09/04 at 02:55 p.m.
Chuck, I posted a parody today, twice---didn't enable comments the first time and I meant to, so I posted again and enabled comments. Could you delete the first one? It's a parody of "Mrs. Robinson". Thanks. Royce
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: rmiller on 03/10/04 at 08:20 a.m.
Chuck, please delete www.amiright.com/parody/70s/simongarfunkel17.shtml-- It's a duplicate. sorry. Royce
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: nally on 03/10/04 at 08:54 a.m.
Quoting:
Chuck, please delete www.amiright.com/parody/70s/simongarfunkel17.shtml-- Â It's a duplicate. Â sorry. Â Royce
End Quote
I think the URL you want him to delete is www.amiright.com/parody/70s/simongarfunkel7.shtml . I checked. :)
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Neo Matrix on 03/11/04 at 08:04 a.m.
Saider eiegle has a duplicate parody, his recent "Hungry 2004" is on the site twice. http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/rubenstuddard5.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 03/15/04 at 12:41 a.m.
Please get rid of http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/steviewonder30.shtml is because it's exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/steviewonder31.shtml
Subject: Please delete, thank you
Written By: raddog20002002 on 03/18/04 at 04:24 p.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/survivor7.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/falco5.shtml
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/bowwowwow1.shtml
:P
Subject: Please modify, thank you
Written By: raddog20002002 on 03/18/04 at 04:34 p.m.
Modify this parody:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/hulkhogan1.shtml
But don't change the lyrics: "And I really don't care if she's black or white"
Also modify this parody:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/80s/direstraits16.shtml
Just change this parody any way you want it.
Is this what you mean by asking you to modify parodies, Chucky G? This is the first time I did this and I know it takes you longer to modify parodies than it does to remove them.
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Neo Matrix on 03/20/04 at 02:00 a.m.
Quoting:
Saider eiegle has a duplicate parody, his recent "Hungry 2004" is on the site twice. http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/rubenstuddard5.shtml
End Quote
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johnny_D on 03/21/04 at 10:43 p.m.
Hi Chucky,
I pressed the PROCESS button more than once accidentally when I posted my new Crosby Stills & Nash parody “Pre-Road Drunks”. If you catch duplicates of that parody, please delete the dupes.
Thanks!
JD
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 03/22/04 at 09:00 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/byrds2.shtml is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/byrds1.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Ellipsis on 03/22/04 at 01:21 p.m.
I notice some more...
http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional366.shtml should go because it's exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional354.shtml
In fact, this particular author has a few sets of duplicates; I don't know why he submitted them more than once. ::)
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ChuckyG on 03/22/04 at 01:49 p.m.
ok... I made all the most recent deletions...
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: neminem on 03/22/04 at 02:53 p.m.
Quoting:
So... how about that Neminem song, by the way? It's still capitalized, and it's one of my better ones.
End Quote
*Poke*
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johnny_D on 03/22/04 at 04:48 p.m.
Chucky,
I accidentally posted a duplicate of a new parody - if you can catch the duplicate at or before tomorrow's posting-time, please remove the duplicate .... otherwise I'll contact you after post-time with the URL of the dupe to be deleted.
The parody in question is a parody of the new Enterprise TV show theme.
The duplicate "bad" version I want deleted has the title:
"Space Full of Farts"
The good version that I want to keep and post is titled:
"Space-Farts On TV / Space Full of Farts"
So if you can intercept the "bad" version with the SHORTER title, "Space Full of Farts", please delete it.
Don't delete the one with the LONGER title.
Thanks very much,
Johnny D
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Johnny_D on 03/23/04 at 06:36 a.m.
Chucky,
Please delete:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/russellwatson1.shtml
Thanks
Johnny D
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 03/23/04 at 09:15 a.m.
Hate to bug you again... but I found another pair.
Please dump http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/greenday14.shtml because it's exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/greenday11.shtml <-- (keep this one)
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Mr. X on 03/23/04 at 10:10 a.m.
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmcclean12.shtml is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/donmcclean11.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 03/24/04 at 12:57 a.m.
Take away http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional369.shtml because it is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/misc/traditional243.shtml
Take away http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/fountainsofwayne22.shtml because it is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/fountainsofwayne23.shtml .
Like I said the other day, this author has submitted quite a few of his parodies twice.
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: Mr X on 04/12/04 at 08:02 a.m.
hey, it looks like we have another triplicate submission:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/simpleplan23.shtml is exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/simpleplan24.shtml and http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/simpleplan25.shtml
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: philbo_baggins on 04/12/04 at 02:05 p.m.
I'm sure I didn't submit this twice, but I know I did hit preview quite a few times as I kept seeing tweaks and typos...
http://www.amiright.com/parody/70s/thecastfromgrease1.shtml
is the one to go, please.
Thanks
Phil
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: ... on 04/13/04 at 07:32 a.m.
Looks like we have a lot of duplicate entries for today (April 13th). Among those:
http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/corona0.shtml should go because it's exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/90s/corona1.shtml .
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/robzombie2.shtml should go because it's exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/robzombie3.shtml .
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/blink182140.shtml should go because it's exactly the same as http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/blink182141.shtml
and the list goes on.
Subject: Re: Duplicate parodies
Written By: neminem on 04/13/04 at 10:09 a.m.
Something is messed up with http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/blink182141.shtml
It's exactly the same as
http://www.amiright.com/parody/2000s/eminem156.shtml
I don't know either of the originals, but it looks far more like should be the latter than the former.