inthe00s
The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.




Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: musicguy93 on 03/14/19 at 11:27 am

I've been thinking about this for a while. I've seen many people, both on the internet (including this website) and in real life, group the 80s and 90s together. And I'll admit, for a while I probably did the same thing. But as I analyzed both decades, I've come to realize that people are only really referring to the late 80s and VERY early 90s (like 1990-much of 1991). But I don't think the statement holds much water. For starters:

1. Synth and Dance pop was huge in the 80s. There were a few holdovers from the genres in 1990. But many of them were already declining by about late 1991.

2. House music was much bigger even in the early 90s alone than it was in the 80s.

3. Yes, Hair Metal was relatively popular for the first year and a half, or so, of the 90s. But it wasn't nearly as popular as it was around 1986/1987ish.

4. Animation was really booming. In the 70s and early-mid 80s, a lot of animation was cheaply made (compared to the golden age from the 1930s-early 1960s) and was mostly made to sell toys (ie, He-Man, Transformers, G.I. Joe, etc.). This was already changing in the late 80s with cartoons like Ducktales, TMNT (I guess one could argue that this was made to sell toys too, but it still was high quality than the early 80s cartoons), and The Real Ghostbusters, to name a few. Then, of course, in the 90s, you had a huge explosion of high quality animation. Tiny Toons, Ren and Stimpy, Batman The Animated Series, Rocko's Modern Life, etc. Not to mention, in the film industry, you had the Disney Renaissance.

5. Fashion. Now this is where things might get a bit dicey. And I'll admit I'm not as well versed in this category as I'd like to think. But if we look at the majority of the 90s, say from about mid 1992 onward, we can see that it's totally different from the 80s. Barring the fact that grunge was popular, regular fashion was a lot more casual. Now I know a lot of people have argued that "big hair" stayed until 1994. But really, it's was just more voluminous hair. I mean, here are some pics just for comparison sake:

1987:

https://i.etsystatic.com/6191330/r/il/84c674/1220508629/il_794xN.1220508629_c2fi.jpg

1992:

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/98/6d/17/986d17c92749ad9535614af5f35f99e5.jpg

Yes, the second one is more voluminous compared to hair styles in the mid-late 90s, but I wouldn't consider it "big hair". And it's very different from the first image. You can clearly see those two years are two different eras. There are some more examples, but I don't want to overfill this post.

I'm not really going to get into the political differences, as I am not too familiar with the politics of either era (at least not on a meaningful level). But I'm sure there are significant differences there, so if anyone cares to fill us in on that, feel free.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: JackSepton on 03/14/19 at 12:50 pm

the early 90s obv had alot of similarities with the late 80s, but apart from that the decades were noticebly different from eachother

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: Voiceofthe70s on 03/14/19 at 2:15 pm

Who is grouping the 80s and 90s together as one thing? I haven't seen that. And if anybody is doing that they couldn't be more incorrect. Those two decades were as different as chicken and cheese.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: 2001 on 03/14/19 at 5:38 pm


Who is grouping the 80s and 90s together as one thing? I haven't seen that. And if anybody is doing that they couldn't be more incorrect. Those two decades were as different as chicken and cheese.


I think by 90s he means early 90s. I've seen a few people here say that 1990 is the most '80s year. ;D

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: violet_shy on 03/15/19 at 7:57 pm

I only group them together because I grew up during both decades.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: JackSepton on 03/16/19 at 3:14 pm


I only group them together because I grew up during both decades.




you didnt grow up in the 80s since you were born in 1980, you have to be born in 1975-1977 to having grown up in the 80s
if you were born in 1980 your memories began on January 1th 1983, so how can you claim to having grown up in the 80s then since you cant even remember 1980-1982?
read what Nicole1977 has to say in this thread and read it really carefully http://www.inthe00s.com/archive/inthe90s/smf/1293764034.shtml,  she was born in 1977 so she was the ultimate 80s kid according to herself

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: Dundee on 03/16/19 at 4:02 pm

I guess it's because they're last two decades of the previous century and therefore the most modern of the bunch and yet simultanously "retro nostalgic" since they're dated on their own right which in turn creates loads of cliches that are attributed to both.

Most people on the internet nowadays are unable to tell what sets 1983 from 1987 apart, or 1995 from 1992, so seeing those decades as big consistent blobs has become somewhat the norm, which easen the process of lumping them together as well.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 03/16/19 at 5:07 pm

That girl in the second pic looks like Phoebe Buffay from Friends ;D.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: violet_shy on 03/16/19 at 5:23 pm




you didnt grow up in the 80s since you were born in 1980, you have to be born in 1975-1977 to having grown up in the 80s
if you were born in 1980 your memories began on January 1th 1983, so how can you claim to having grown up in the 80s then since you cant even remember 1980-1982?
read what Nicole1977 has to say in this thread and read it really carefully http://www.inthe00s.com/archive/inthe90s/smf/1293764034.shtml,  she was born in 1977 so she was the ultimate 80s kid according to herself


Well I can remember everything, so yes I grew up in the 80s. My memories did not start in 1983. I have memories of 1981 and 82 as well. And I have a good memory. Everyone is different. Not EVERYONE begins to have memories at age 3.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: musicguy93 on 03/16/19 at 7:45 pm




you didnt grow up in the 80s since you were born in 1980, you have to be born in 1975-1977 to having grown up in the 80s
if you were born in 1980 your memories began on January 1th 1983, so how can you claim to having grown up in the 80s then since you cant even remember 1980-1982?
read what Nicole1977 has to say in this thread and read it really carefully http://www.inthe00s.com/archive/inthe90s/smf/1293764034.shtml,  she was born in 1977 so she was the ultimate 80s kid according to herself


That's a bit off topic, dude.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: musicguy93 on 03/16/19 at 7:50 pm


I only group them together because I grew up during both decades.


I guess I can understand that. My older sister was born in 1987, so 1990-1999 was her childhood, and she tends to group it all together. My post wasn't really targeting anyone on this site. In fact, it's mostly outside of this site, where people see the 80s and 90s as one whole era. Particularly on Youtube, Buzzfeed, various news sites, etc.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: musicguy93 on 03/16/19 at 7:51 pm


That girl in the second pic looks like Phoebe Buffay from Friends ;D.


I believe that's Drew Barrymore in the second pic. But yeah, she does look a bit like Phoebe.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: BornIn86 on 03/16/19 at 9:46 pm

To people who fully experienced the 80s: do you think the 90s relate overall more with the 80s or the 2000s?

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: yelimsexa on 03/18/19 at 6:40 am

ABC now groups them together on Wednesday nights, with The '80s-themed The Goldbergs being followed by the '90s-based spinoff Schooled. But it depends on the situation, as it works better in certain subjects.

Socially, the '90s are more like the '00s, but technologically more like the '80s. VCRs, modern tube TVs with features like stereo sound, closed captioning, and wireless remotes, CRT computer monitors with command prompts and floppy disks, cassettes and CDs (though obviously the later gradually became more popular), beige furniture, wooded kitchen cabinets, white and black-colored appliances, and landline telephones with answering machines come to mind when I think "80s and 90s tech" grouped together. The modern "PC movement" got its start in the early '90s, along with the Third Way movement, compared to the more conservative eighties. There was a lot more diversity in pop culture in the '90s as well.

Most of the "grouping" IMO comes from the 1987-1995 period, when things like TMNT, New Jack Swing, golden age of hip hop, the Disney Renaissance (including DuckTales and Roger Rabbit), Full House, Bon Jovi, golden age Nickelodeon, high-volume hair, adult contemporary balladeers, and "Pizza Hut"-type culture prevails. The last few years of the '90s of course are a bellwether to the '00s millenial culture and Internet revolution. But at the end, we're coming up on 20 years since the end of the '90s and 40 since the start of the '80s, which means that this period now lasts just about as long as the time since then, and as time passes on, will continue to become more blended, with the next "fallacy" being the entire late 20th century period, including the late 1960s and 1970s with things like rock's overall popularity, the life of Baby Boomers, television before the Internet took over, postmodern art, and others that we may not make out at this time.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: SmartBo1 on 03/18/19 at 1:29 pm




you didnt grow up in the 80s since you were born in 1980, you have to be born in 1975-1977 to having grown up in the 80s
if you were born in 1980 your memories began on January 1th 1983, so how can you claim to having grown up in the 80s then since you cant even remember 1980-1982?
read what Nicole1977 has to say in this thread and read it really carefully http://www.inthe00s.com/archive/inthe90s/smf/1293764034.shtml,  she was born in 1977 so she was the ultimate 80s kid according to herself

Go attention seek somewhere else please.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: JackSepton on 03/18/19 at 2:06 pm


Go attention seek somewhere else please.



oh look we have another 1980 born "80s kid" ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: violet_shy on 03/18/19 at 4:02 pm



oh look we have another 1980 born "80s kid" ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


It doesn't matter being born in 80 that's still an 80s kid. I was 7 in 1987....it was the 80s and I was a kid. What do you call that? THAT'S AN 80S KID! I wasn't 6 or 7 in 1992 or 2002. I'm an 80s kid like it or not.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: nally on 03/18/19 at 4:03 pm


It doesn't matter being born in 80 that's still an 80s kid. I was 7 in 1987....it was the 80s and I was a kid. What do you call that? THAT'S AN 80S KID! I wasn't 6 or 7 in 1992 or 2002. I'm an 80s kid like it or not.
Same with me!

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mwalker1996 on 03/18/19 at 7:16 pm


It doesn't matter being born in 80 that's still an 80s kid. I was 7 in 1987....it was the 80s and I was a kid. What do you call that? THAT'S AN 80S KID! I wasn't 6 or 7 in 1992 or 2002. I'm an 80s kid like it or not.
I consider you an 80s kid. You were old enough to remember the regan era.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: violet_shy on 03/18/19 at 7:42 pm


I consider you an 80s kid. You were old enough to remember the regan era.


Ok now I feel really old  ;D

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: Howard on 03/19/19 at 7:22 am


I consider you an 80s kid. You were old enough to remember the Reagan era.

I remember that era too.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: 2001 on 03/19/19 at 11:17 am


It doesn't matter being born in 80 that's still an 80s kid. I was 7 in 1987....it was the 80s and I was a kid. What do you call that? THAT'S AN 80S KID! I wasn't 6 or 7 in 1992 or 2002. I'm an 80s kid like it or not.


Ignore him. He makes everything about decade kid debates. You could have a thread about Ancient Egypt and his only contribution to the thread will be "You have to be born 2567 BC to remember life before the Pyramids, people born late 2566 BC were too late"  ::)

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: violet_shy on 03/19/19 at 2:33 pm


Ignore him. He makes everything about decade kid debates. You could have a thread about Ancient Egypt and his only contribution to the thread will be "You have to be born 2567 BC to remember life before the Pyramids, people born late 2566 BC were too late"  ::)


Hahaha  ;D

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: bchris02 on 03/19/19 at 10:56 pm

People group the 50s and the 60s together even though the 50s were more socially aligned with the 40s than the 60s.  I think the real reason people do this is first of all, the cultural eighties lingered into the 90s for a good while.  I would say the true 90s feel didn't arrive until 1993.  Secondly, for older people the difference between the two decades may be less than people who grew up then think.  I would say the four biggest differences between the 80s and the 90s are as follows.

1) Music: Dominant genres in the 90s, after about 1993, were very different from what was popular in the 80s.
2) Entertainment: The 80s were very safe and basic.  The 90s were a lot more experimental and were a time to push the envelope.  This is one reason the religious right loved the 80s but hated the 90s.
3) Tech: The Internet wasn't for everyone in 1990.  It was slow and difficult to use and there wasn't a lot of content available.  In 1999, everyone was either online or knew somebody who was.  In the 80s the cassette ruled while in the 90s it was all about the CD.
4) Geopolitics: The 80s was still the Cold War.  The 90s was more similar to the current era.

However, older people may have been able to completely or almost completely avoid the 80s-90s transition.  80s-style music was still widely available and played in the 90s on "lite rock" radio stations.  There was also plenty of family-friendly television available in the 90s even though prime time network TV was becoming edgier.  Also, there still were quite a few stragglers, managing to avoid the Internet until the '00s.  Cars still came with cassette players as late as the early 2000s. Also, some people just don't follow politics, period.  For these people, they might not perceive that many differences between the two decades.  There were lots of similarities between them as well.

I would say two decades that people in the future will probably link together are the 00s and the 10s.  The 10s are evolved from the 00s but I wouldn't say they are radically different.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mwalker1996 on 03/23/19 at 4:51 pm


People group the 50s and the 60s together even though the 50s were more socially aligned with the 40s than the 60s.  I think the real reason people do this is, first of all, the cultural eighties lingered into the 90s for a good while.  I would say the true 90s feel didn't arrive until 1993.  Secondly, for older people, the difference between the two decades may be less than people who grew up then think.  I would say the four biggest differences between the 80s and the 90s are as follows.

1) Music: Dominant genres in the 90s, after about 1993, were very different from what was popular in the 80s.
2) Entertainment: The 80s were very safe and basic.  The 90s were a lot more experimental and were a time to push the envelope.  This is one reason the religious right loved the 80s but hated the 90s.
3) Tech: The Internet wasn't for everyone in 1990.  It was slow and difficult to use and there wasn't a lot of content available.  In 1999, everyone was either online or knew somebody who was.  In the 80s the cassette ruled while in the 90s it was all about the CD.
4) Geopolitics: The 80s was still the Cold War.  The 90s was more similar to the current era.

However, older people may have been able to completely or almost completely avoid the 80s-90s transition.  80s-style music was still widely available and played in the 90s on "lite rock" radio stations.  There was also plenty of family-friendly television available in the 90s even though prime time network TV was becoming edgier.  Also, there still were quite a few stragglers, managing to avoid the Internet until the '00s.  Cars still came with cassette players as late as the early 2000s. Also, some people just don't follow politics, period.  For these people, they might not perceive that many differences between the two decades.  There were lots of similarities between them as well.

I would say two decades that people in the future will probably link together are the 00s and the 10s.  The 10s are evolved from the 00s but I wouldn't say they are radically different.
As a 09s kid I see the 10s and 00s as very different but a person who's older may not see it. Just like how Rainbow was able to distinctly tell the difference between the mid 10s and late 10s music.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mc98 on 03/23/19 at 7:58 pm


As a 09s kid I see the 10s and 00s as very different but a person who's older may not see it. Just like how Rainbow was able to distinctly tell the difference between the mid 10s and late 10s music.


I relate to Rainbow because I was a teen in the early-mid 2010s. During my senior year in 2016-2017, things started to change when pop culture felt kinda dark.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: fgbn on 03/23/19 at 9:51 pm

the early 90s had many commonalities with the late 80s, personally i think of 91-93 as the going from the late 80s to the core 90s period
with every year becoming less 80s and more 90s like, considering change is gradual and doesnt happen overnight

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: annimal on 03/23/19 at 10:53 pm

I was born in 82.  I got the joy of  hearing Barbie Girl before I went deaf.  I cannot recall any music that stupid from the 80's at any time.  I don't think it's just my age, cartoons were not good in the 90's.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mwalker1996 on 03/24/19 at 8:59 am


I was born in 82.  I got the joy of  hearing Barbie Girl before I went deaf.  I cannot recall any music that stupid from the 80's at any time.  I don't think it's just my age, cartoons were not good in the 90's.
Oh wow I though you were born in 87. I know you feel like a veteran on this site.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: annimal on 03/24/19 at 10:34 am

just new people around here.  I just wonder why in the past and now nobody has ever really asked me any questions.  I don't often get comments from my comments either.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: NewMedalz on 04/02/19 at 1:43 am

The late '90s and early '80s are very different. The mid '90s and the mid '80s are moderately different. The early '90s and the late '80s aren't very different.

Not that complicated IMO.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: musicguy93 on 04/07/19 at 2:47 pm


ABC now groups them together on Wednesday nights, with The '80s-themed The Goldbergs being followed by the '90s-based spinoff Schooled. But it depends on the situation, as it works better in certain subjects.

Socially, the '90s are more like the '00s, but technologically more like the '80s. VCRs, modern tube TVs with features like stereo sound, closed captioning, and wireless remotes, CRT computer monitors with command prompts and floppy disks, cassettes and CDs (though obviously the later gradually became more popular), beige furniture, wooded kitchen cabinets, white and black-colored appliances, and landline telephones with answering machines come to mind when I think "80s and 90s tech" grouped together. The modern "PC movement" got its start in the early '90s, along with the Third Way movement, compared to the more conservative eighties. There was a lot more diversity in pop culture in the '90s as well.

Most of the "grouping" IMO comes from the 1987-1995 period, when things like TMNT, New Jack Swing, golden age of hip hop, the Disney Renaissance (including DuckTales and Roger Rabbit), Full House, Bon Jovi, golden age Nickelodeon, high-volume hair, adult contemporary balladeers, and "Pizza Hut"-type culture prevails. The last few years of the '90s of course are a bellwether to the '00s millenial culture and Internet revolution. But at the end, we're coming up on 20 years since the end of the '90s and 40 since the start of the '80s, which means that this period now lasts just about as long as the time since then, and as time passes on, will continue to become more blended, with the next "fallacy" being the entire late 20th century period, including the late 1960s and 1970s with things like rock's overall popularity, the life of Baby Boomers, television before the Internet took over, postmodern art, and others that we may not make out at this time.


Technologically speaking, it's kind of weird. The start of the 00s and end of the 00s were drastically different from each other. I'd say the early 00s were definitely more similar to the 90s. VHS tapes were still the primary format for films, CRT T.V.'s were wayyyy more commonplace than flat-screen T.V.s (you had to be loaded to own one back in the early 00s). People were also still using floppy disks, and to a lesser extent, cassette tapes (though by this point CDs were more common). To be honest, even in the mid-late 90s, CDs were already starting to supplant cassette tapes. The one area that was advancing pretty quickly in the early 00s were video games. In 2000, we were still primarily in the 5th generation of consoles. But by 2002ish, the 6th generation was in full force. That's probably the only exception.

To put it short, I agree that the 80s and earlier 90s are very similar, when it comes to technology. Not so much the mid-late 90s.

I definitely agree that the 90s were socially closer to the 00s than they were to the 80s. The Reagan and Clinton eras were as different as night and day.

To be honest, I've never thought to group 1987-1995 as one era. 1987/1988-1991, possibly also 1992, but definitely not 1993-1995. It just seems way too broad to me. It's true that TMNT was arguably at it's peak in the early 90s, especially with the first two live-action movies. And it's also true that the original series did air until 1996. However the third movie turned out to be a disaster both financially and critically, the episodes of the mid 90s (Red Sky era) were significantly less popular than the ones of the late 80s/early 90s. The mid 90s were all about Mighty Morphin Power Rangers. I'm honestly not to familiar for what constitutes the golden age of hip hop, to be honest, so I can't really say anything there. All I know is that around late 1992/1993ish, Gangsta Rap exploded into the mainstream.

I personally wouldn't include Ducktales and Who Framed Roger Rabbit as apart of the Disney Renaissance. I mean, I think they definitely helped the company become more successful after their Dark Age in the 70s and early-mid 80s. But I wouldn't say they signified the beginning of the Renaissance. Although, the term "Disney Renaissance" is pretty retroactive, and probably didn't exist until the 90s were well over. Though I would agree that the earlier part of the Renaissance (1989-1994) was far more successful than the latter part (1995-1999). I've honestly never heard the term "Pizza Hut Culture", so I'll take your word for it. I've also heard multiple definitions of the "Golden Age of Nickelodeon", so I guess I'll take your word on that too.

Full House may be the main reason why people group 1987-1995 together. But from my understanding, the earlier seasons, were not very popular. As for stuff like Bon Jovi, Adult-Contemporary music, and high-volume hair, they did still exist in the early-mid 90s. But they had all updated with the times. They really were not the same as they were in the 80s.

I agree that it's probably because the entire 90s are now 20+ years old now, that they get grouped with the 80s nowadays.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: 80sfan on 05/12/19 at 5:18 pm

I call 1987 to 1992 the Everything is boxy, big, and bulky, era.  :)

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: musicguy93 on 05/13/19 at 10:13 pm


The late '90s and early '80s are very different. The mid '90s and the mid '80s are moderately different. The early '90s and the late '80s aren't very different.

Not that complicated IMO.


The mid 90s and mid 80s are not just moderately different. They are worlds apart! For example, in the mid 80s, stuff like New wave, synthpop, and hair metal were extremely popular. In the mid 90s, it was all about alternative rock, late grunge/early post-grunge, gangsta rap, techno/trance music, etc. Obviously there are more genres within each era, but I'm just naming a few. Also the animation industry was still arguably in its dark age in the mid 80s. The second golden age of animation had its roots in the late 80s, and really took off in the mid 90s. I could go on, but yeah, mid 80s and mid 90s are completely different from each other.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mwalker1996 on 05/14/19 at 1:51 pm

No one really puts the 80s and 90s together. People acknowledge the difference between the two decades. The  90s and 00s get lumped in together a lot especially in the early 10s when it was cool to hate on the 00s

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: yelimsexa on 05/28/19 at 6:58 am

I forgot to point out that anything that has to do with "Generation X" will often do something similar, even if older Millennials like myself enjoyed a lot of the childhood trends.

https://www.tampabay.com/restaurants/bar-review-tampa-tavern-has-a-gen-x-rating-20190516/

In case the article disappears, this "Gen X Tavern" talks about items from the era ranging from CRT televisions, SNES, knickknacks, Mr. T and Care Bears tap handles, to a mural of school lockers decorated in stickers.

But like I said, it's part of accommodation one single generation. We've explained some of the differences, but remember that although the '50s/'60s were frequently grouped together when these decades are current, lately that seems to be gravitating more towards the '60s and '70s for the Baby Boomers, as they are coming to terms that except for a little rock 'n roll toward the end, the '50s weren't much different from the 1940s, especially the post-WWII portion of it. Pac-Man and Sonic Adventure may be nearly two decades apart, but both fall into the "classic video game" mold, as does Devo and Korn with "Gen X classic rock" or "Friday The 13th" and "The Matrix" in terms of films. As it is, it's just a sign that even 1999 is now old enough to be vintage, while at the older end, 1980 is still young enough to be "retro cool" as opposed to being "historically quaint" like the Baby Boomer era and back is. That said, I myself wasn't alive for the Baby Boomer era, but can easily distinguish the early, mid, and late '60s as well as the Nixon and post-Nixon '70s based on watching classic films, TV, music, and even magazines.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: NewMedalz on 05/28/19 at 4:53 pm


The mid 90s and mid 80s are not just moderately different. They are worlds apart! For example, in the mid 80s, stuff like New wave, synthpop, and hair metal were extremely popular. In the mid 90s, it was all about alternative rock, late grunge/early post-grunge, gangsta rap, techno/trance music, etc. Obviously there are more genres within each era, but I'm just naming a few. Also the animation industry was still arguably in its dark age in the mid 80s. The second golden age of animation had its roots in the late 80s, and really took off in the mid 90s. I could go on, but yeah, mid 80s and mid 90s are completely different from each other.


Eh, socially and technologically speaking I would rank the differences as moderate overall. A lot of the differences you've noted are more superficial in nature. And even then, assuming by 'mid' we're talking about the 3-6 years here, then by the time you get to 1993 vs. 1986 the differences aren't all that huge.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: rapplepop on 06/02/19 at 7:04 pm


Eh, socially and technologically speaking I would rank the differences as moderate overall. A lot of the differences you've noted are more superficial in nature. And even then, assuming by 'mid' we're talking about the 3-6 years here, then by the time you get to 1993 vs. 1986 the differences aren't all that huge.


I agree. I first watched Back to the Future in the mid 90s. 1985 was before I was born, but it still seemed modern to me at the time. 1985 and 1995 are definitely different but no more different than 1995 and 2005 or 2005 and 2015.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: rapplepop on 06/02/19 at 7:05 pm

I don't think people really group the 80s and 90s together though. I think the 80s are perceived as being a much more old fashioned decade. If anything people lump the 90s and 00s together for reasons such as the popularity of alternative rock and the emergence of the Internet and cell phones.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/03/19 at 11:38 am

I actually sort of view the '80s, '90s and early '00s as it's own sort of era, at least when it comes to stuff I can relate to. That probably sounds a bit controversial, but I do consider my growing up years to have quite a few similarities. That would be stuff like the golden age of video games, when platformers and RPGs were still dominant before shooters and online gaming took over, physical media being dominant, with everybody still doing to video stores to buy stuff on VHS and DVD, traditional TV still being a dominant form of media before online streaming made network programming out of style, hanging out at the mall still being a big deal, sitcoms and TV shows generally still being more cheesy and over the top, actually calling your buddies on the phone and not being able to talk over social media. There are obviously differences, of course, particularly when talking about pop culture, but if you were to look at the stuff that the average teen of the early '00s did, I would say that it would be much closer to an early '90s teen than an early '10s teen.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: mwalker1996 on 06/03/19 at 8:36 pm


I actually sort of view the '80s, '90s and early '00s as it's own sort of era, at least when it comes to stuff I can relate to. That probably sounds a bit controversial, but I do consider my growing up years to have quite a few similarities. That would be stuff like the golden age of video games, when platformers and RPGs were still dominant before shooters and online gaming took over, physical media being dominant, with everybody still doing to video stores to buy stuff on VHS and DVD, traditional TV still being a dominant form of media before online streaming made network programming out of style, hanging out at the mall still being a big deal, sitcoms and TV shows generally still being more cheesy and over the top, actually calling your buddies on the phone and not being able to talk over social media. There are obviously differences, of course, particularly when talking about pop culture, but if you were to look at the stuff that the average teen of the early '00s did, I would say that it would be much closer to an early '90s teen than an early '10s teen.
True, the mid 80s-early 00s seems to be the transtion from the 20th century to the 21st century with the rise of computers, video games, physical media, modern cable television, and when going to the mall was a big deal. By the mid 00s everything seem to shifted with the rise of social media, digital media replacing physical media, etc.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: rapplepop on 06/03/19 at 11:05 pm


I actually sort of view the '80s, '90s and early '00s as it's own sort of era, at least when it comes to stuff I can relate to. That probably sounds a bit controversial, but I do consider my growing up years to have quite a few similarities. That would be stuff like the golden age of video games, when platformers and RPGs were still dominant before shooters and online gaming took over, physical media being dominant, with everybody still doing to video stores to buy stuff on VHS and DVD, traditional TV still being a dominant form of media before online streaming made network programming out of style, hanging out at the mall still being a big deal, sitcoms and TV shows generally still being more cheesy and over the top, actually calling your buddies on the phone and not being able to talk over social media. There are obviously differences, of course, particularly when talking about pop culture, but if you were to look at the stuff that the average teen of the early '00s did, I would say that it would be much closer to an early '90s teen than an early '10s teen.


Yeah I agree. 1980 to say as late as 2007 had that "mall culture" going on, video stores, no or minimal social media (Myspace barely counts). The typical American suburban life wasn't hugely different in the mid 00s than it was compared to the 80s or 90s. It was mostly TV centric, even though the Internet was around for the latter part of that period.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: Dundee on 06/07/19 at 12:14 pm

The 90s and 00s get lumped in together a lot
Speaking of, yeah that's a very common thing that is done and I dunno why. They're very different decades and the similarities are vague at best.

Case in point, my uni is organizing a "nineties and nillies"-themed party this month (nillies is a dumb name to gave to the 2000s for some reason), and it's weird because you usually only do one decade as a theme at a time :(.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: wixness on 06/07/19 at 1:49 pm


I guess it's because they're last two decades of the previous century and therefore the most modern of the bunch and yet simultanously "retro nostalgic" since they're dated on their own right which in turn creates loads of cliches that are attributed to both.



Exactly this. I think there's a whole postmodernist attitude towards things that scorns the present like it were a disease. I do it to the 2010s, but I believe it's because of people's poor taste in music and with their fascination for retro and gender-conforming fashion. I find anything before the 2000s too dated for me - granted, I was born in the late 90s, but even then, nothing really appeals to me outside the 2000s.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: wixness on 06/07/19 at 2:06 pm


Speaking of, yeah that's a very common thing that is done and I dunno why. They're very different decades and the similarities are vague at best.

Case in point, my uni is organizing a "nineties and nillies"-themed party this month (nillies is a dumb name to gave to the 2000s for some reason), and it's weird because you usually only do one decade as a theme at a time :( .



I find this quite problematic, especially when people only bring up the "early 2000s".


I'm annoyed that people don't really want to consider the rest of the 2000s, when it was filled with pop punk and emotional and melodic sounding music regardless of the instruments they were played on and regardless of the lyrics, and when it was filled with more gender non-conforming fashion IMO when guys wore their hair long (or when androgyny was seen as a big deal).


I might explore reasons on another thread as to why the 2000s seems so universally loathed.

Subject: Re: Has it become a fallacy to group the 80s and 90s together?

Written By: Retrolover on 06/29/19 at 7:36 am

A fallacy? No, but it’s mainly Xennials that group the 80s and 90s together. Most Generation X men and all genders of Generation Y tend to group the 90s and 00s together. Xennials we’re enjoying what was left of 80s pop culture in the 90s to latch on to the culture being launched in the 90s.

Check for new replies or respond here...