The Pop Culture Information Society...
These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.
Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.
This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.
Check for new replies or respond here...
Subject: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/17/06 at 3:21 pm
I'd say that 1996-1997 was culturally the nadir of the '90s...despite some very good stuff like Beck, it was a much duller year than 1995-1996.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/17/06 at 8:53 pm
1997 was not a dull year...it was musically the best year of the 90s!
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 1993 on 05/17/06 at 9:56 pm
1996-1997 were just bridge years between the still old school early 90's and the beginnings of the modern, plugged in techno world we live in today. In terms of technological advancements those were huge years...but in terms of pop culture, music, sports, they were very dull years. We also had a very boring, forgettable presidential election.
That's not to say they were bad years, the economy was good...but they weren't thrilling.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/17/06 at 9:59 pm
This may sound dumb, but I'm not sure what a "Nadir" is... ???
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Donnie Darko on 05/18/06 at 12:13 am
1996
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 3:04 am
This may sound dumb, but I'm not sure what a "Nadir" is... ???
It's a fancy word for 'peak' or 'height'.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 5:56 am
It's a fancy word for 'peak' or 'height'.
No, it means bottom. "Apex" means top.
I think it was 1996 going into early 1997. Or maybe late 1996. 1997-1998 was a very good year, but in 1996 we just had the Macarena. An overwhelming number of what was around into the middle of '96 was released in '95, which was a very good year.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 6:20 am
No, it means bottom. "Apex" means top.
I think it was 1996 going into early 1997. Or maybe late 1996. 1997-1998 was a very good year, but in 1996 we just had the Macarena. An overwhelming number of what was around into the middle of '96 was released in '95, which was a very good year.
Oh yeah, peak...opposite of 'zenith' or 'apex'
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 12:19 pm
It's hard to determine the peak of '90s culture, because it was so varied. 1994-1995 or so definitely came close, and really the whole period from summer '93 to summer '95 was quite '90s.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 05/18/06 at 1:48 pm
No, it means bottom. "Apex" means top.
I think it was 1996 going into early 1997. Or maybe late 1996. 1997-1998 was a very good year, but in 1996 we just had the Macarena. An overwhelming number of what was around into the middle of '96 was released in '95, which was a very good year.
I agree. Late 1996-Early 1997 was probably the absolute worst of the 90's. Actually i'm surprised no one said 1990.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 2:53 pm
I agree. Late 1996-Early 1997 was probably the absolute worst of the 90's. Actually i'm surprised no one said 1990.
Early 1996's culture was essentially carried over 1995 stuff (1995-1996 was a great year), but the rest of the year was very boring, particularly the fall, that being the reason why the Macarena became so popular. "Unbreak My Heart" was another big hit that year, one of the major '90s monster hits. The rest of what there was to '96-'97 was "Wannabe" (Spice Girls), "No Diggity" (Blackstreet), "Tha Crossroads", Madonna's "Evita" stuff, Beck, the Foo Fighters, and Marilyn Manson. Then the '90s started improving again around the middle of 1997, I think.
And 1990 was very bad. Of course, I think 2006-2007 will probably be the nadir of the '00s.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 3:14 pm
I agree. Late 1996-Early 1997 was probably the absolute worst of the 90's. Actually i'm surprised no one said 1990.
You all have got to be kidding me?? ???
Late 96 / Early 97 was a Great Time (Especially for Music Overall)
The worst of the '90s by far is Late 98 / Early 99
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 05/18/06 at 3:21 pm
You all have got to be kidding me?? ???
Late 96 / Early 97 was a Great Time (Especially for Music Overall)
The worst of the '90s by far is Late 98 / Early 99
I dont't nessesarly think that late '96-early '97 is that bad I just think that it's the worst peroid of music in the '90s other than 1990. Although I will admit that 1998-1999 wasn't exactly a great time for music either.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 3:41 pm
You all have got to be kidding me?? ???
Late 96 / Early 97 was a Great Time (Especially for Music Overall)
The worst of the '90s by far is Late 98 / Early 99
Explain to me what made it so great. '98/'99 was pretty bad too, but I think it was better than '96/'97 or '90/'91.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 4:28 pm
Explain to me what made it so great. '98/'99 was pretty bad too, but I think it was better than '96/'97 or '90/'91.
Obviously then it's Personal Preference. You prefer 98/99 because that was the Peak of your Childhood in the '90s, while 96/97 was mine
Everything was great for me "personally" in Late 96/Early 97. I was in 4th Grade and it was great at the time. The Music wasn't Bad at all like you claim. I actually remember it well and listened to the Radio alot at that time
I would like you to tell me what's so bad about it? How could you even remember it anyway?
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Donnie Darko on 05/18/06 at 4:37 pm
Obviously then it's Personal Preference. You prefer 98/99 because that was the Peak of your Childhood in the '90s, while 96/97 was mine
Everything was great for me "personally" in Late 96/Early 97. I was in 4th Grade and it was great at the time. The Music wasn't Bad at all like you claim. I actually remember it well and listened to the Radio alot at that time
I would like you to tell me what's so bad about it? How could you even remember it anyway?
He'd know it to some extent. Maybe not the pop culture (I didn't follow music until 1999), but he'd know the general atmospher (I'd know, I'm just a few months older than him). 1990ers are children of the '90s too :)
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 4:48 pm
He'd know it to some extent. Maybe not the pop culture (I didn't follow music until 1999), but he'd know the general atmospher (I'd know, I'm just a few months older than him). 1990ers are children of the '90s too :)
Jeeze Louise. Sure he might know it, but he sure as Hell doesn't know it more than me. Duh! That's the Point!
Do people even think before they type anymore??
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Donnie Darko on 05/18/06 at 4:49 pm
Jeeze Louise. Sure he might know it, but he sure as Hell doesn't know it more than me. Duh! That's the Point!
Do people even think before they type anymore??
To be fair, if he can't know 1996, you can't know 1990, 1991, or 1992.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 4:53 pm
To be fair, if he can't know 1996, you can't know 1990, 1991, or 1992.
That seems fair to me, because it's pretty much true. I sure as Hell wasn't listening to popular music in 90, 91, or 92 and I didn't have a feel at all for the atmosphere of everything or the pop-culture
I'm sure it would piss you all off too if someone Born in 1994 were acting as if they knew 1999 just as much as you did in terms of Pop-Culture and Music and what-not from supposed personal experience
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 5:04 pm
Another think i'd like to add
You have to look at it from my view. Obviously you were not listening to Popular Music in Late 96 / Early 97. So you go by just looking at the charts and seeing these songs and coming to a conclusion that it sucks. You have to realize that at the time, these songs were actually pretty good. They were Fresh and New. They might be old and played out today, but at the time, they were great and so was the entire feel of life
And just like you guys feel about the Late '90s when you were around 9 and 10 is the same way I felt around the Mid '90s. Everything was great
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Donnie Darko on 05/18/06 at 5:07 pm
Another think i'd like to add
You have to look at it from my view. Obviously you were not listening to Popular Music in Late 96 / Early 97. So you go by just looking at the charts and seeing these songs and coming to a conclusion that it sucks. You have to realize that at the time, these songs were actually pretty good. They were Fresh and New. They might be old and played out today, but at the time, they were great and so was the entire feel of life
And just like you guys feel about the Late '90s when you were around 9 and 10 is the same way I felt around the Mid '90s. Everything was great
Fair enough :)
You'd say I was genuinely "there" in the late '90s, right?
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 5:13 pm
Fair enough :)
You'd say I was genuinely "there" in the late '90s, right?
I'm not sure what you mean
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Marty McFly on 05/18/06 at 5:22 pm
To be fair, if he can't know 1996, you can't know 1990, 1991, or 1992.
And I can't know 1987 and 1988, which is very not true. ;)
Like I've said, I think once someone reaches age 6 or 7, they have an almost perfect memory of things. Even back to 3 in a reduced extent.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 5:24 pm
Looks like everybody is still arguing about the same old crap, lol.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 5:26 pm
And I can't know 1987 and 1988, which is very not true. ;)
Like I've said, I think once someone reaches age 6 or 7, they have an almost perfect memory of things. Even back to 3 in a reduced extent.
Yeah you can remember things as early as 3 or so.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 5:27 pm
And I can't know 1987 and 1988, which is very not true. ;)
Like I've said, I think once someone reaches age 6 or 7, they have an almost perfect memory of things. Even back to 3 in a reduced extent.
I doubt that. Plus, someone 10 Years Old would have a better memory and understanding of the time than a 6 year old would. Plus, we were talking mainly about the Music, and no 6 year olds are listening to Popular Music on a daily basis.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Donnie Darko on 05/18/06 at 5:29 pm
I doubt that. Plus, someone 10 Years Old would have a better memory and understanding of the time than a 6 year old would. Plus, we were talking mainly about the Music, and no 6 year olds are listening to Popular Music on a daily basis.
Just because you weren't there as a teen, doesn't mean you weren't there at all.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 5:30 pm
I doubt that. Plus, someone 10 Years Old would have a better memory and understanding of the time than a 6 year old would. Plus, we were talking mainly about the Music, and no 6 year olds are listening to Popular Music on a daily basis.
Most aren't but I bet there are some that do. Nobody's saying you don't have a better memory than the 1990ers, and someone born in 1982 would have a better memory than us probably, but the '90ers can remember some things from the late '90s as well.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 5:31 pm
Just because you weren't there as a teen, doesn't mean you weren't there at all.
Yea that's true, it all depends on individual experience.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Marty McFly on 05/18/06 at 5:39 pm
I doubt that. Plus, someone 10 Years Old would have a better memory and understanding of the time than a 6 year old would. Plus, we were talking mainly about the Music, and no 6 year olds are listening to Popular Music on a daily basis.
No offense dude, but you're wrong on that one too. I'm actually an '81er (although, schoolwise an '82er ;) ) and I was introduced to many many songs as a kid in 1986, 1988, etc. because my parents commonly listented to music at home and in the car, etc. Same with other "adults" I knew.
By the age of 6, I liked alot of stuff, so don't lump everyone into one boat. Was I out getting l*id at a Bon Jovi concert in 1987 or driving my dad's car? Of course not, but that doesn't mean I can't remember it.
Same with a 1990er in 1996. Take it easy. :)
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 5:40 pm
Bottom Line, No 6 Year Old listens to Popular Music on a daily basis, and if by some slim chance they did, they didn't appreciate it as much as someone a little older to understand it
Where is Trimac when you need him... ::)
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Donnie Darko on 05/18/06 at 5:41 pm
Bottom Line, No 6 Year Old listens to Popular Music on a daily basis, and if by some slim chance they did, they didn't appreciate it as much as someone a little older to understand it
Where is Trimac when you need him... ::)
I admit I don't know 1996 as well as 2001 or 2005, but I was around then. I wasn't around in the early '90s, but I had a minimal mid '90s presence.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Marty McFly on 05/18/06 at 5:41 pm
Bottom Line, No 6 Year Old listens to Popular Music on a daily basis, and if by some slim chance they did, they didn't appreciate it as much as someone a little older to understand it
Where is Trimac when you need him... ::)
You mean you didn't. There's a difference between you (and, for that matter, people you knew) than everyone. How many 6 year olds exist in the world? Millions and millions. And just like any adult or teen, they are all different too. Just because they're children doesn't mean they're dormant and stupid and have no tastes, etc.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 5:43 pm
You mean you didn't. There's a difference between you (and, for that matter, people you knew) than everyone. How many 6 year olds exist in the world? Millions and millions. And just like any adult or teen, they are all different too. Just because they're children doesn't mean they're dormant and stupid and have no tastes, etc.
I agree Marty, you can't make assumptions about every 6 year old based on your experience.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Marty McFly on 05/18/06 at 5:48 pm
I'll give him one thing. I have more "personal world" experience of, say 1994+ than I do even with 1989 or 1991. By the time I was 12, I started to go places on my own at least in a reduced extent (i.e. if my mom went to the mall, I'd go to the music store of the arcade on my own 'till she was done). I watched more TV and hung out with people from school more too, but that doesn't mean I abandoned stuff I'd liked several years earlier in 1987.
Hell, I even have fragmented memories of the "Hall and Oates esque" early '80s.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 5:51 pm
I'll give him one thing. I have more "personal world" experience of, say 1994+ than I do even with 1989 or 1991. By the time I was 12, I started to go places on my own at least in a reduced extent (i.e. if my mom went to the mall, I'd go to the music store of the arcade on my own 'till she was done). I watched more TV and hung out with people from school more too, but that doesn't mean I abandoned stuff I'd liked several years earlier in 1987.
Hell, I even have fragmented memories of the "Hall and Oates esque" early '80s.
Well of course, I know say 2000 + way more than I do 1996, but that doesn't mean you can't like/remember anything from your younger years.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Marty McFly on 05/18/06 at 6:03 pm
^Absolutely. ;) In fact, that's almost more special just because it's the first stuff you ever liked, so in a way, you'll be comparing everything else to that. But what someone liked at age 5, 7, etc is 100% "fresh".
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 6:30 pm
Also, to prove my point that 98/99 was the Worst Time for Music, I took a Computer Screenshot of my XM/Napster Program (Which has the full Billboard Charts dating back to the 60s)
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6112/989910du.jpg (Click on the link to see the picture)
And please stop it with the smiley faces with the "Haha, Yeah we told him!" attitude. Trying to make it seem as if i'm the bad guy here or something.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 6:32 pm
Also, to prove my point that 98/99 was the Worst Time for Music, I took a Computer Screenshot of my XM/Napster Program (Which has the full Billboard Charts dating back to the 60s)
http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6112/989910du.jpg (Click on the link to see the picture)
And please stop it with the smiley faces with the "Haha, Yeah we told him!" attitude. Trying to make it seem as if i'm the bad guy here or something.
Yeah I have Napster too. I actually liked a lot of late '90s pop so I didn't mind the music then, though the music wasn't as good as the mid '90s.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 6:45 pm
I was just looking through the entire Billboard Hot 100 of the '90s on the Napster thing, and the "Best" period for Music that I found was the Spring of 1992
http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/7389/19926cz.jpg (Click the link to see the pic)
Songs like "To Be With You", "Jump", "Bohemian Rhapsody", "Remember The Time", "Baby Got Back", "Tears In Heaven", "My Lovin'", "Under The Bridge", "Make It Happen", "In The Closet", "I Can't Dance" and ....."I'm Too Sexy" ( ;D)
All of which are songs that I like. Pretty Impressive Lineup :o
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 6:46 pm
You seem to have an inferiority complex, 5*19*86. You know, you keep repeating "I'm 20! I was 10 and not 6 in 1996!" And yet you refuse to tell me what was so great about 1996-1997. You act like every child is some blind mole-rat. Like, if you're such a big 20 year old, why do you feel the need to assert your superiority over a 16-year old on a freaking message board? If you're 20, than act like you're 20, and not some 13 year old complaining 10 year olds like stuff that he likes and act like they know more about it.
Ever heard of a CAR RADIO, by the way? I would say the first year I actively knew some songs ("Unbreak My Heart", "Macarena", "Tha Diggity") was 1996-1997, but I knew what sort of stuff and what I liked on the radio before then.
And you just keep saying "Oh, well you were 6", instead of realizing I did research...I mean, if we were dealing with a real '90s teen we would both look like little Gen Y brats. Like, you're not that much older than me. Get over it. I know you need something to inflate your ego...but don't do it around me.
And, if you want to stop being called a bad guy, than stop acting like an ass, seriously. It's not appealing. And I've been waiting to tell you off for awhile.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 7:02 pm
You seem to have an inferiority complex, 5*19*86. You know, you keep repeating "I'm 20! I was 10 and not 6 in 1996!" And yet you refuse to tell me what was so great about 1996-1997. You act like every child is some blind mole-rat. Like, if you're such a big 20 year old, why do you feel the need to assert your superiority over a 16-year old on a freaking message board? If you're 20, than act like you're 20, and not some 13 year old complaining 10 year olds like stuff that he likes and act like they know more about it.
Ever heard of a CAR RADIO, by the way? I would say the first year I actively knew some songs ("Unbreak My Heart", "Macarena", "Tha Diggity") was 1996-1997, but I knew what sort of stuff and what I liked on the radio before then.
And you just keep saying "Oh, well you were 6", instead of realizing I did research...I mean, if we were dealing with a real '90s teen we would both look like little Gen Y brats. Like, you're not that much older than me. Get over it. I know you need something to inflate your ego...but don't do it around me.
And, if you want to stop being called a bad guy, than stop acting like an ass, seriously. It's not appealing. And I've been waiting to tell you off for awhile.
Actually, you're one of those typical Arrogant Gen Y'ers. You want to convince yourself that you know the '90s as much as possible, but you don't and it bugs you. You can probably only remember 1998 and 1999 the most, but you continue to be a snobby brat by claiming to know things perfectly since you were like 3 or 4, which is complete crap. It's just a way for you to convince yourself and everyone else that you remember a larger portion of the '90s than you actually should
I don't buy into your crap. And i've been waiting to tell you off for a while also
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 7:12 pm
Actually, you're one of those typical Arrogant Gen Y'ers. You want to convince yourself that you know the '90s as much as possible, but you don't and it bugs you. You can probably only remember 1998 and 1999 the most, but you continue to be a snobby brat by claiming to know things perfectly since you were like 3 or 4, which is complete crap. It's just a way for you to convince yourself and everyone else that you remember a larger portion of the '90s than you actually should
I don't buy into your crap. And i've been waiting to tell you off for a while also
Well, I don't claim to remember all of the '90s. I claim to have researched that. I claim to remember the late '90s. I remember the "feel" of the mid-'90s, i.e. what the world was like. And stop saying what I should and shouldn't remember.
Stop putting words in my mouth, you sad moron. It's like you need to be elevated above somebody. You were 7.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 7:17 pm
And why do you even care so much? I only care so much because you've made me do so.
You act like you expect people to put up with you being a massive jerk. You're constantly attacking people to elevate your ego. Don't you have ANY social skills to know people won't put up with that, however much you think you're right? Apparently not, you 20-year old 13-year old who needs to feel like he knows something, at least. You really like getting in fights, don't you? You're a pathetic person, and leave me alone.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 7:21 pm
Keep waiting because I'm fairly certain neither velvetoneo, myself nor anyone else who reads this thread wants to read about how you can't stand yet ANOTHER member of this site.
Why does every damn thread you post in have to turn into a fight? Can't you ever disagree with someone without turning it into a war of personal attacks. Everyone needs to just grow up.
I agree it's time to stop arguing about this stupid meaningless crap.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Marty McFly on 05/18/06 at 7:25 pm
Actually, you're one of those typical Arrogant Gen Y'ers. You want to convince yourself that you know the '90s as much as possible, but you don't and it bugs you. You can probably only remember 1998 and 1999 the most, but you continue to be a snobby brat by claiming to know things perfectly since you were like 3 or 4, which is complete crap. It's just a way for you to convince yourself and everyone else that you remember a larger portion of the '90s than you actually should
I don't buy into your crap. And i've been waiting to tell you off for a while also
You shouldn't assume things about people. We're all different. I'm not saying there aren't certain common factors in certain groups sometimes, but don't assume every 6 year old is one way, or every 15 year old or every 30 year old thinks/feels/the same way. This isn't the Stepford Wives. ;)
If you were to say, "I didn't listen to popular music when I was 6", I could respect that. But to use your own logic that one has to "be there" - you haven't "been there" to see Velvetoneo's (or mine, or anyone else's) life play out, so how would you know what he liked at the age of 6, etc?
P.S. I know alot from the '70s and earlier '80s even if I wasn't born yet or barely was. I heard alot of, say 1979 songs on the radio in 1985, or watched '80s videos on VH1 in 1992, etc. ;) I watched alot of TV shows/documentaries on the '80s, etc. as well, so I was very very familar with the "feel".
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 8:03 pm
Yeah, there's a difference between a "feel", since we live in an age constantly immersed with pop culture, and knowing the minutiae of pop culture like a teenager does. I heard alot of say 1988 songs on the radio in 1995, for example, and I knew alot of the '90s from being into '90s culture (grunge, grrl stuff), around '99.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 8:51 pm
Man you should stop making assumptions about what people 'should' or 'should not' remember. I mean, I still find it hard to believe someone born in 1990 could remember the 'feel' of an era in the mid-1990s(when I really only knew about 1994, at age 8), but if velvetoneo is adamant he does remember, then we just have to assume that's what he remembers. Sure, it could be part nostalgic, but there's nothing really wrong with that, is there? Let's just agree that we 1986ers can still remember farther back (nothing makes up for 4 years), and leave it at that, ok?
I remember the "feel" of the early '90s, and I was very young, you have to understand what we mean by feel, I mean I remember certain aspects of the enviroment and the sound of some of the music I heard playing in the mall. I don't think velvetoneo is claiming to have an exact memory of the mid '90s, just a general feel/idea what the time was like.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 8:53 pm
I remember the "feel" of the early '90s, and I was very young, you have to understand what we mean by feel, I mean I remember certain aspects of the enviroment and the sound of some of the music I heard playing in the mall. I don't think velvetoneo is claiming to have an exact memory of the mid '90s, just a general feel/idea what the time was like.
I'm sure if I had paid attention I could had remembered as far back as 1993 pretty well, but since I was never really interested in such things til' I was about 12, I can only really remember accurately from the late 90s. But having said that I believe when one reads alot/immerses themselves in a past era they probably think they remember than they actually do.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:00 pm
I'm sure if I had paid attention I could had remembered as far back as 1993 pretty well, but since I was never really interested in such things til' I was about 12, I can only really remember accurately from the late 90s. But having said that I believe when one reads alot/immerses themselves in a past era they probably think they remember than they actually do.
Well I did too trimac, I didn't pay much attention until 1999 probably, but there are still somethings that you can't get around remembering even if you didn't pay much attention because they were so popular. Like the spice girls, I didn't pay much attention to music until 1999 or 2000, but the spice girls were talked about everywhere in 1997 that of course I remember them. Same with that Un-Break my heart song, it was everywhere and I also remember it. I was aware of Boyz II Men, Smashing Pumpkins, Weezer, RHCP, REM, of course by aware I generally mean I simply knew of their existence but didn't care much about them though I actually did listen to some REM then because I wanted the CD my older cousin got. I was also aware of that Achy Breaky Heart song in the early '90s, because it was simply so popular that I somehow became aware of it. But the last thing you said is also true, there are things that I definitely remember, but then there are things that I possibly may remember but I'm not 100 % sure on it.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:01 pm
This is exactly the f'n point i'm trying to make IF ANY OF YOU WOULD PAY ANY DAMN ATTENTION!
No one has a Clear Memory of everyday stuff from when they were 5 or 6, because they weren't paying attention. They didn't know they would be "Nostalgic" 10 years down the road, they didn't even know what Nostalgia was. Which is why a 6 year old doesn't recollect stuff the same way a 10 or 11 year old would or anyone else older. The point I've been trying to make this entire thread is that him at 6 years old probably was not listening or caring about popular music the same way I was, yet he sits here and criticizes it anyway. That's pretty arrogant for a 6 year old to criticize that music when 12 year olds were enjoying it ::)
I'm not totally taking his POV, let's get that straight...
Being there and listening to the music isn't the same thing, I agree as much as anyone on that point. But he obviously does know quite a bit about that era, and someone with a particular sharp memory may remember stuff from 5-6. However, of course he will be too young to really accurately analyse and compare what he remembers, since it will be remembered through a 5 year olds eyes, ears.etc. I make no bones about saying I have a better picture of the early 90s than virtually anyone born in 1990.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:05 pm
This is exactly the f'n point i'm trying to make IF ANY OF YOU WOULD PAY ANY DAMN ATTENTION!
No one has a Clear Memory of everyday stuff from when they were 5 or 6, because they weren't paying attention. They didn't know they would be "Nostalgic" 10 years down the road, they didn't even know what Nostalgia was. Which is why a 6 year old doesn't recollect stuff the same way a 10 or 11 year old would or anyone else older. The point I've been trying to make this entire thread is that him at 6 years old probably was not listening or caring about popular music the same way I was, yet he sits here and criticizes it anyway. That's pretty arrogant for a 6 year old to criticize that music when 12 year olds were enjoying it ::)
You are partially right, that a 6 year old of course does not remember things as good as a 10 year old, but that doesn't mean that the 6 year old doesn't remember anything. At 6 or 7 you do have the ability to remember things clearly if you were one that happened to pay attentioned and there are some out there that did.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:05 pm
Well I did too trimac, I didn't pay much attention until 1999 probably, but there are still somethings that you can't get around remembering even if you didn't pay much attention because they were so popular. Like the spice girls, I didn't pay much attention to music until 1999 or 2000, but the spice girls were talked about everywhere in 1997 that of course I remember them. Same with that Un-Break my heart song, it was everywhere and I also remember it. I was aware of Boyz II Men, Smashing Pumpkins, Weezer, RHCP, REM, of course by aware I generally mean I simply knew of their existence but didn't care much about them though I actually did listen to some REM then because I wanted the CD my older cousin got. I was also aware of that Achy Breaky Heart song in the early '90s, because it was simply so popular that I somehow became aware of it. But the last thing you said is also true, there are things that I definitely remember, but then there are things that I possibly may remember but I'm not 100 % sure on it.
Yeah, what I remember in the early 90s usually related to being a kid. Since few of my peers really listened to music regularly (alot less than today, at least) what I remember was mainly on the radio...I just find it amazing how velvetoneo can accurately describes the 'fabrics', the clothing styles.etc as early as 1995 from 'personal experience'. One just assumes he has a really accurate, photographic memory? I sort of remember 90s clothing, but most 9yo kids dont pay attention to things like that.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 9:10 pm
Yeah, what I remember in the early 90s usually related to being a kid. Since few of my peers really listened to music regularly (alot less than today, at least) what I remember was mainly on the radio...I just find it amazing how velvetoneo can accurately describes the 'fabrics', the clothing styles.etc as early as 1995 from 'personal experience'. One just assumes he has a really accurate, photographic memory? I sort of remember 90s clothing, but most 9yo kids dont pay attention to things like that.
Look, he's just trying to fit in. I'm trying to sound as nice as possible about it, but seriously, there is no possible way he remembers stuff like that from experience in the Early or Mid '90s. I don't care what any of you say, it's not NORMAL
He just wants an identity in remembering the '90s. As do the rest of us. I'm sure me and you sometimes try to act as if we know a little more than we actually do, but atleast we do know a good portion of the '90s and remember it, more so the Mid/Late '90s. Trust me though, neither of us remember the Early '90s in a "perfect" sense. Just occasional things that seem like they were 100 years ago
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:12 pm
Yeah, what I remember in the early 90s usually related to being a kid. Since few of my peers really listened to music regularly (alot less than today, at least) what I remember was mainly on the radio...I just find it amazing how velvetoneo can accurately describes the 'fabrics', the clothing styles.etc as early as 1995 from 'personal experience'. One just assumes he has a really accurate, photographic memory? I sort of remember 90s clothing, but most 9yo kids dont pay attention to things like that.
Well I definitely remember the colors of the early '90s, because they stick out so much but no I don't remember too many specifics from the early '90s just some facts about the enviroment. To be honest I don't even follow or care about fashion that much nowadays. I don't know how veletoneo remembers as much as he does, but he's pretty intelligent and I'm not going to sit here calling him a liar.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:14 pm
Look, he's just trying to fit in. I'm trying to sound as nice as possible about it, but seriously, there is no possible way he remembers stuff like that from experience in the Early or Mid '90s. I don't care what any of you say, it's not NORMAL
He just wants an identity in remembering the '90s. As do the rest of us. I'm sure me and you sometimes try to act as if we know a little more than we actually do, but atleast we do know a good portion of the '90s and remember it, more so the Mid/Late '90s. Trust me though, neither of us remember the Early '90s in a "perfect" sense. Just occasional things that seem like they were 100 years ago
That's how I remember the early '90s as well, some things but nothing too significant mostly personal stuff but that's still important to me. He definitely does not have a perfect memory of the mid '90s, but I don't think he claimed to, he just said he remember the enviroment somewhat which is pretty much how I remember the early '90s.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:14 pm
Look, he's just trying to fit in. I'm trying to sound as nice as possible about it, but seriously, there is no possible way he remembers stuff like that from experience in the Early or Mid '90s. I don't care what any of you say, it's not NORMAL
He just wants an identity in remembering the '90s. As do the rest of us. I'm sure me and you sometimes try to act as if we know a little more than we actually do, but atleast we do know a good portion of the '90s and remember it, more so the Mid/Late '90s. Trust me though, neither of us remember the Early '90s in a "perfect" sense. Just occasional things that seem like they were 100 years ago
I think you'll find Donnie Darko/velvetoneo quite unique in their appreciation of the 90s compared to most 1990ers, who don't even know who 'Hole' is, and only know Grunge from Nirvana and Pearl Jam. I can't really get into his head, so I don't really know. There's no way to prove it, so I'll guess I just have to take his word on that one.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 9:17 pm
Well I definitely remember the colors of the early '90s, because they stick out so much but no I don't remember too many specifics from the early '90s just some facts about the enviroment. To be honest I don't even follow or care about fashion that much nowadays. I don't know how veletoneo remembers as much as he does, but he's pretty intelligent and I'm not going to sit here calling him a liar.
That's fine, but I will continue to do so. You gotta have a devil's advocate somewhere. Not everyone is going to do the same thing
Maybe i'm selfish in going by my own experience and how I don't remember things clearly until I was around 10 and a half or 11, but still I don't see how anyone else could be so much different. I'm pretty sure it's the Human Cycle not to remember things clearly until you're around 9/10/11 years old. And that's what i'm sticking with here...
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 9:21 pm
I think you'll find Donnie Darko/velvetoneo quite unique in their appreciation of the 90s compared to most 1990ers, who don't even know who 'Hole' is, and only know Grunge from Nirvana and Pearl Jam. I can't really get into his head, so I don't really know. There's no way to prove it, so I'll guess I just have to take his word on that one.
That's because they are "Nostalgic". Something that most people that young have not really come across yet. So of course they will know their stuff of the Early '90s from research and stuff, just like you and me. But that doesn't mean they were walking around at 6 years old with their Sony Walkman listening to Top 40 Music and remembering it well. Which is the point i'm still on here
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:22 pm
That's fine, but I will continue to do so. You gotta have a devil's advocate somewhere. Not everyone is going to do the same thing
Maybe i'm selfish in going by my own experience and how I don't remember things clearly until I was around 10 and a half or 11, but still I don't see how anyone else could be so much different. I'm pretty sure it's the Human Cycle not to remember things clearly until you're around 9/10/11 years old. And that's what i'm sticking with here...
It's certainly the 'typical' age, but what's the say velvetoneo was atypical in having a particularly good memory? Some autistic sauvants, for example, can paint a scene they saw like a year ago to the finest detail. Now I'm not saying velvet's an autistic sauvant (lol), but I agree the 'typical' age of remembering is 8-9-10, but one has to acknowledge some people may having particularly good powers of recollection.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:23 pm
That's because they are "Nostalgic". Something that most people that young have not really come across yet. So of course they will know their stuff of the Early '90s from research and stuff, just like you and me. But that doesn't mean they were walking around at 6 years old with their Sony Walkman listening to Top 40 Music and remembering it well. Which is the point i'm still on here
What 6 year old even had a walkman? :D I sure wish I'd got into pop music back then, but casettes were so expensive, and CD's even more so. I didn't have the slightest interest in music AT ALL until about 1999...
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:24 pm
That's because they are "Nostalgic". Something that most people that young have not really come across yet. So of course they will know their stuff of the Early '90s from research and stuff, just like you and me. But that doesn't mean they were walking around at 6 years old with their Sony Walkman listening to Top 40 Music and remembering it well. Which is the point i'm still on here
6 is still old enough to have a memory of something if they paid attention, 3 or 4 would be too young to have a good memory, but 6 or 7 is old enough to know some popular songs if they happened to be one that paid attention.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:28 pm
6 is still old enough to have a memory of something if they paid attention, 3 or 4 would be too young to have a good memory, but 6 or 7 is old enough to know some popular songs if they happened to be one that paid attention.
Yeah, I think the earliest songs I remember are from age 5-6, probably some Beatles' songs. Apart from the songs we sung in school, which I remember vividly from Year 1-2...
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:29 pm
What 6 year old even had a walkman? :D I sure wish I'd got into pop music back then, but casettes were so expensive, and CD's even more so. I didn't have the slightest interest in music AT ALL until about 1999...
I got mine at 7 1/2, but I never used it much then because I was too busy just being a kid. I so wish I paid more attention that I did, because I remember so many other things outside of music.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 9:33 pm
By feel, I mean:
-The feel of a general street, i.e. cars, storefronts, decor, etc.
-Clothing.
-What sort of music I heard on the radio (Whitney Houston-esque soft rock and '90s dance-pop, when I was with my babysitter.)
The first specific song I remember being everywhere is most definitely the Macarena, from the summer of '96.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:36 pm
By feel, I mean:
-The feel of a general street, i.e. cars, storefronts, decor, etc.
-Clothing.
-What sort of music I heard on the radio (Whitney Houston-esque soft rock and '90s dance-pop, when I was with my babysitter.)
The first specific song I remember being everywhere is most definitely the Macarena, from the summer of '96.
This is what I was telling them, you're not claiming to remember that much specific just the general feel. I definitely can see you remembering Macarena, I mean how could you have avoided it in 1996.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:36 pm
By feel, I mean:
-The feel of a general street, i.e. cars, storefronts, decor, etc.
-Clothing.
-What sort of music I heard on the radio (Whitney Houston-esque soft rock and '90s dance-pop, when I was with my babysitter.)
The first specific song I remember being everywhere is most definitely the Macarena, from the summer of '96.
Yeah, it's amazing you were only 6 in 1996, when I felt like I was a 'big kid.' Btw, when did you feel you could 'look down' at the smaller kids? (well, I was always one the shortest, so I probably never had that priveledge, lol)
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 9:40 pm
6 is still old enough to have a memory of something if they paid attention, 3 or 4 would be too young to have a good memory, but 6 or 7 is old enough to know some popular songs if they happened to be one that paid attention.
But that's the point. NO ONE at that age was paying attention. It's just a normal human thing. Children are Careless
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:41 pm
But that's the point. NO ONE at that age was paying attention. It's just a normal human thing. Children are Careless
When did you start remembering songs on the radio, 5*19*86?
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 9:44 pm
Yeah, it's amazing you were only 6 in 1996, when I felt like I was a 'big kid.' Btw, when did you feel you could 'look down' at the smaller kids? (well, I was always one the shortest, so I probably never had that priveledge, lol)
For example, I knew the "hat to the back" thing was cool then, because the big kids (i.e. somebody probably born in 1984) and the teenagers on TV wore it that way. Did I know specific names of most musical artists, or any other than what my parents listened to until maybe '96-'97 at the earliest? No. But I knew what sort of music was played in malls, for instance. I think I recall remembering who Mariah Carey was in 1st grade (of course, she was huge in 96-97.)
I was like the shortest kid also... ;).
One thing we can definitely agree on is that we all were pretty young for most of the '90s. However, I think you make so many assumptions about 1990ers...like a "typical 1990er" knows who Hole and Soundgarden are. We're not that ignorant and we're not that much younger than a 1986er. A 1978er would scoff on you for being snooty about '90s remembrance.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 9:46 pm
But that's the point. NO ONE at that age was paying attention. It's just a normal human thing. Children are Careless
I do remember hearing some stuff playing on other people's radios or on mall speakers from when I was 5 or 6, however it's nothing specific really until about 1996 with Macarena, then Un Break My Heart, then Wannabe in 1997. So about 9 is when I really started remember a few specific songs. the only specific song I remember from the early '90s is Achy Breaky Heart.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:46 pm
For example, I knew the "hat to the back" thing was cool then, because the big kids (i.e. somebody probably born in 1984) and the teenagers on TV wore it that way. Did I know specific names of most musical artists, or any other than what my parents listened to until maybe '96-'97 at the earliest? No. But I knew what sort of music was played in malls, for instance. I think I recall remembering who Mariah Carey was in 1st grade (of course, she was huge in 96-97.)
I was like the shortest kid also... ;).
One thing we can definitely agree on is that we all were pretty young for most of the '90s. However, I think you make so many assumptions about 1990ers...like a "typical 1990er" knows who Hole and Soundgarden are. We're not that ignorant and we're not that much younger than a 1986er. A 1978er would scoff on you for being snooty about '90s remembrance.
Yeah, someone born in 1982 would have a much better memory of the 90s than me. But I think you had to have been at least 14-15 in 1990 to appreciate the entire decade from an age old enough to appreciate what was going on. I'm not saying I remember the ENTIRE 90s well. Probably on remember the period post-96 REALLY well, and as early as 91 in a vague sort of way.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 9:48 pm
When did you start remembering songs on the radio, 5*19*86?
It definitely began around Mid/Late 1996 when I was 10.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 9:49 pm
Yeah, someone born in 1982 would have a much better memory of the 90s than me. But I think you had to have been at least 14-15 in 1990 to appreciate the entire decade from an age old enough to appreciate what was going on. I'm not saying I remember the ENTIRE 90s well. Probably on remember the period post-96 REALLY well, and as early as 91 in a vague sort of way.
Also, pop culture in the late '90s, even from about 96-97, was VERY targeted towards kids. I know alot of people about your age who say they only remember being part of the '90s pop culturally from the Macarena and up, while most people my age would say the Macarena and up. The Spice Girls changed everything, I think. What's weird is that my parents remember alot of stuff from the early '60s.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:50 pm
It definitely began around Mid/Late 1996 when I was 10.
The first band I really remember being on TV, in magazines was Oasis, sometime in 1995. They were huge, even I knew 'Wonderwall' as early as '96.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 9:52 pm
The first band I really remember being on TV, in magazines was Oasis, sometime in 1995. They were huge, even I knew 'Wonderwall' as early as '96.
There was definitely that change with kid-focus in culture. Like some periods are more kid-oriented than others...the mid-'60s were with Beatlemania, the first part of the '70s with the Osmonds and the Jackson 5 were, the late '80s period with Menudo and such were, and the late '90s were-EXTREMELY.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:52 pm
Also, pop culture in the late '90s, even from about 96-97, was VERY targeted towards kids. I know alot of people about your age who say they only remember being part of the '90s pop culturally from the Macarena and up, while most people my age would say the Macarena and up. The Spice Girls changed everything, I think. What's weird is that my parents remember alot of stuff from the early '60s.
Yes, that's true. The fact pop-culture was tangented towards kids may be an equalizing factor between us. Kids also began taking to video games.etc earlier towards the late 90s (whe more ppl had them) , so even 2D video games aren't exclusively early-mid Gen Y. If you did a poll, I'd say at least 60% of 86ers played SNES as a kid, and perhaps 30% of 90ers. Whereas in 2000, most kids over 8-9 would've played video games.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 9:56 pm
Yes, that's true. The fact pop-culture was tangented towards kids may be an equalizing factor between us. Kids also began taking to video games.etc earlier towards the late 90s (whe more ppl had them) , so even 2D video games aren't exclusively early-mid Gen Y. If you did a poll, I'd say at least 60% of 86ers played SNES as a kid, and perhaps 30% of 90ers. Whereas in 2000, most kids over 8-9 would've played video games.
I also think the whole Spice Girls equalizing factor unifies the 1986-1990 group. If you were part of the Spice Girls fad in a big way, you're part of that peak Y group. And that would approximately be somebody from 1st to 5th grade around 1996-1997.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: 5.19.86 on 05/18/06 at 9:58 pm
I remember me and my Best Friend constantly arguing in 1997 over which Spice Girl was the Hottest. He always said "Sporty Spice" and I always said "Posh Spice"
I still think it's "Posh"
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 9:59 pm
I also think the whole Spice Girls equalizing factor unifies the 1986-1990 group. If you were part of the Spice Girls fad in a big way, you're part of that peak Y group. And that would approximately be somebody from 1st to 5th grade around 1996-1997.
Space Girls peaked about 1997. Yes, I remember they were huge among my age group. AQUA was also huge. I do remember my cousins who were born in 1988 or 1990 were really big fans of Aqua, and the late 90s Euro-pop/ Vengaboys dancey sort of music.lol.
It's a pity our age group wasn't as much a fan of grunge back in the early 90s
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 10:00 pm
Space Girls peaked about 1997. Yes, I remember they were huge among my age group. AQUA was also huge. I do remember my cousins who were born in 1988 or 1990 were really big fans of Aqua, and the late 90s Euro-pop/ Vengaboys dancey sort of music.lol.
It's a pity our age group wasn't as much a fan of grunge back in the early 90s
well we were like 4-6 years old, grunge isn't really something that appeals to 5 year olds.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: velvetoneo on 05/18/06 at 10:02 pm
Space Girls peaked about 1997. Yes, I remember they were huge among my age group. AQUA was also huge. I do remember my cousins who were born in 1988 or 1990 were really big fans of Aqua, and the late 90s Euro-pop/ Vengaboys dancey sort of music.lol.
It's a pity our age group wasn't as much a fan of grunge back in the early 90s
The number of songs I remember definitely explodes around 1997-1998, when I started buying compilation tapes with stuff like "Sex and Candy" and "Barbie Girl" on them, and I got introduced to Radiohead through one of them.
The early-mid '90s were absolutely un-kid targeted, though. All music was for the 10+ sorts.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 10:02 pm
well we were like 4-6 years old, grunge isn't really something that appeals to 5 year olds.
Yeah, did anyone notice the 90s charts (apart from the late 90s) were very TEEN/Adult orientated compared to today? Perhaps that's the main reason, teens have better taste than tweeny-boppers!
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 10:03 pm
Yeah, did anyone notice the 90s charts (apart from the late 90s) were very TEEN/Adult orientated compared to today? Perhaps that's the main reason, teens have better taste than tweeny-boppers!
yeah that's true, today's charts are very much controlled almost solely by young people.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 10:09 pm
yeah that's true, today's charts are very much controlled almost solely by young people.
I actually think the core audience is actually getting older, with prog rock/A/C, Adult-orientated music. In 99 the peak audience was 12-17, in 06 its closer to 14-24.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 10:10 pm
I actually think the core audience is actually getting older, with prog rock/A/C, Adult-orientated music. In 99 the peak audience was 12-17, in 06 its closer to 14-24.
Yeah it has probably gotten older since the 1999-2001 era.
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: Trimac20 on 05/18/06 at 10:11 pm
Yeah it has probably gotten older since the 1999-2001 era.
Which is of course a good thing. ;)
Subject: Re: Nadir of the '90s
Written By: bbigd04 on 05/18/06 at 10:14 pm
Which is of course a good thing. ;)
That's true, in some ways music has improved since then but hip-hop I think continues to get worse and worse as the decade goes on, I think it reached rock bottom with D4L hitting no. 1 in early 2006, compared to '90s hip-hop today's is total garbage.
Check for new replies or respond here...
Copyright 1995-2020, by Charles R. Grosvenor Jr.