» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Absolutely_Vile on 04/20/03 at 11:29 a.m.

I had started talking about this in the Alison Moyet thread and felt it deserved a thread all its own since things were going horribly off-topic. Basically the discussion was (and I know this is all hindsight) what might Depeche Mode be like if Vince Clarke were still in the band? Especially since Erasure sounds a lot like early Depeche Mode. Would they still be churning out rubbish like "Boys Say Go?" Would Martin only be relegated to writing the odd instrumental like "Big Muff?" (By the way, I do love the instrumentals they do have like PIMPF, etc.) Would they only have lasted a couple of years instead of the 23 they've been around for so far? Who is the better songwriter - Vince Clarke or Martin L. Gore?

Absolutely Vile

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Tv on 04/20/03 at 01:38 p.m.

Depeche Mode is one of the best bands ever to come out. Martin Gore is the man. Vince Clarke was good but they lasted so long how can you say Martin Gore is not the right man in the band? They evolved into the 90's very well. Dave Gahan almost destroyed the band with his drug problems. The band almost broke up in 1995. Gahan got help and in 1997 they put out some good singles like "Its No Good" and "Barrel of A Gun".

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Absolutely_Vile on 04/20/03 at 02:13 p.m.


Quoting:
Martin Gore is the man. Vince Clarke was good but they lasted so long how can you say Martin Gore is not the right man in the band?End Quote



erm...Where did I imply this?? He IS the right man in the band!! Vince Clarke leaving and Martin Gore taking over songwriting responsibilities was the best thing that ever happened to Depeche Mode!! (As well as the adding of Alan Wilder.) Martin is such a talented songwriter and has one of the most beautiful voices I have ever heard. I also must say I admire his style, charm, etc...:)

Quoting:They evolved into the 90's very well. Dave Gahan almost destroyed the band with his drug problems. The band almost broke up in 1995. Gahan got help and in 1997 they put out some good singles like "Its No Good" and "Barrel of A Gun".
End Quote



And the band lost Alan Wilder, which was quite a blow, but yes they've survived. I didn't much like the rockier edge they had with Songs Of Faith And Devotion, but they wanted to experiment with new sounds, and they have every right to do that. It's what keeps a band fresh and new instead of churning out the same stuff year after year. It probably gets a bit tiresome after a while. (But I wouldn't have minded though!)

If I somehow made you think that Martin wasn't the right man for the job, then I apologise. I totally don't think that. I personally think that Vince wasn't the right man, and that Martin becoming the chief songwriter for Depeche Mode was the greatest thing that happened for them. I have nothing but the highest admiration for the man.

Absolutely Vile

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Tv on 04/20/03 at 07:50 p.m.


Quoting:


erm...Where did I imply this?? He IS the right man in the band!! Vince Clarke leaving and Martin Gore taking over songwriting responsibilities was the best thing that ever happened to Depeche Mode!! (As well as the adding of Alan Wilder.) Martin is such a talented songwriter and has one of the most beautiful voices I have ever heard. I also must say I admire his style, charm, etc...:)


And the band lost Alan Wilder, which was quite a blow, but yes they've survived. I didn't much like the rockier edge they had with Songs Of Faith And Devotion, but they wanted to experiment with new sounds, and they have every right to do that. It's what keeps a band fresh and new instead of churning out the same stuff year after year. It probably gets a bit tiresome after a while. (But I wouldn't have minded though!)

If I somehow made you think that Martin wasn't the right man for the job, then I apologise. I totally don't think that. I personally think that Vince wasn't the right man, and that Martin becoming the chief songwriter for Depeche Mode was the greatest thing that happened for them. I have nothing but the highest admiration for the man.

Absolutely Vile
End Quote

First off on "The Songs of Faith and Devotion era" the band really wasn't focused on that tour from what I heard on VH1 "Behind The Music". They were out partying and everything else. The tour was a mess as was the band. That was a very rocky time.

Oh no no need to apologize I was just stating opinion that Gore was the right man for the job. Vince Clark did good a job with Erasure. "Chains of Love", and "Always", are good singles. I could have sworse it was Annie Lennox singing "Always". It sounded like a female to me. Anyway's Depeche Mode always changes and never does the same thing twice. Some people didn't like the single "Dream On" but I liked it because it wasn't the same stuff they were doing in the 80's and 90's. It had an acoutic feel to it. Finally, I don't know if they are going to tour again or what the deal is. That is one of my goals in my life is to see D'Mode play live. If I can find somebody to go with and to find somebody who likes that kind of music..which is a tall order I'll go. Most people like straight up rock music. Depeche Mode is not for everybody's taste.

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: X on 04/20/03 at 10:21 p.m.

I may not know who this Martin Gore is, but haven't we had enough of people with that last name? (And Cheney, too.)

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Absolutely_Vile on 04/20/03 at 11:29 p.m.


Quoting: Vince Clark did good a job with Erasure. "Chains of Love", and "Always", are good singles.End Quote



Unfortunately, I'm not sure who writes the songs for Erasure, whether it's Vince Clarke or Andy Bell. But if it's Vince, he's definitely gotten better over the years since his time with Depeche Mode. But their music still sounds like early Depeche Mode, which is what I thought he wanted to get away from when he left the band in 1981! My whole point in this thread was what Depeche Mode might have ended up like had Vince stayed in the band. Would they have stayed with the same fluffy pop sound that they had in the beginning, or would they have changed like they've been doing now? That is, if they hadn't broken up by now. Music careers can get stagnant after a while if you're doing the same thing over and over again. Are Erasure as popular as they used to be? No, and I don't think they're as popular as Depeche Mode is. (By the way, don't take the term "fluffy pop" as something negative. There's nothing wrong with Depeche Mode's earlier sound. Just Vince's songwriting was horrible back then. Martin Gore definitely saved them from possible obscurity.)

Quoting: Anyway's Depeche Mode always changes and never does the same thing twice. Some people didn't like the single "Dream On" but I liked it because it wasn't the same stuff they were doing in the 80's and 90's. It had an acoutic feel to it. End Quote



I like "Dream On" and some of their other later songs (especially, of course, the ones that Martin sings, like "Home" and "One Caress"). I didn't like stuff such as "I Feel You," "Barrel Of A Gun," "Condemnation," etc., but I'll forgive them. :) I do like that they've experimented and that they're mostly staying electronic. Their music has become deeper and more meaningful over the years, thanks to Martin's development as a songwriter. Martin is brilliant and definitely underrated.

Absolutely Vile

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: My_name_is_Kenny on 04/20/03 at 11:43 p.m.

If Vince Clarke stayed in the band, Depeche Mode might have actually been worth half a dogcrap.  :P  Chains of Love was light years better than the mopey dirges of the Mode.

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: L'Etranger on 04/21/03 at 01:17 a.m.

I think that if Vince Clarke had stuck around, DeMode would have split up because of artistic differences. I don't think any band is big enough to hold two artists of such high calibre. Look at early Roxy Music. Brian Eno had to leave the band and Bryan Ferry got total control of the band. Same with DeMode. I think Vince Clarke would have wanted to do all the Yazoo and Erasure songs, but Martin L. Gore would have quit the group come the third album and done his own projects...

I like Martin L. Gore's voice a lot better than David Gahan's, but David Gahan almost exclusively sings all of the band's songs. It works well live on stage since David does possess frontman charisma. Something Martin sorely lacks...

Btw, I still think David Sylvian and Bryan Ferry have the best vocals in the biz! Those two cannot make a mistake - ever.

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Absolutely_Vile on 04/21/03 at 02:17 a.m.


Quoting:
I think that if Vince Clarke had stuck around, DeMode would have split up because of artistic differences. I don't think any band is big enough to hold two artists of such high calibre. Look at early Roxy Music. Brian Eno had to leave the band and Bryan Ferry got total control of the band. Same with DeMode. I think Vince Clarke would have wanted to do all the Yazoo and Erasure songs, but Martin L. Gore would have quit the group come the third album and done his own projects...End Quote



Oh definitely. I don't think Martin would have gotten the opportunity to show his true genius had Vince stuck around. He would have gotten frustrated and left. And David and Andrew may have followed suit. They may have done a couple of albums then split up...and consequently become a band that was "here today, gone tomorrow" and forgotten about. A one-hit wonder. So many other bands have suffered the same fate, and it's unfortunate. Martin, thankfully, took over and turned Depeche Mode into something with more depth which people will remember for a long time to come should they decide to part ways in the future. But I don't see that happening anytime soon.

Quoting:I like Martin L. Gore's voice a lot better than David Gahan's, but David Gahan almost exclusively sings all of the band's songs. It works well live on stage since David does possess frontman charisma. Something Martin sorely lacks...End Quote



...Which is sad because it could hurt him with his solo career. He's doing a few live shows here and there with his new album coming out, but he does lack stage presence. Although, he does have his vocal talent and his...erm...unique style to compensate. I doubt his fans really care if he has stage presence or not though. They just want to hear him sing! But Martin's apparently a very shy person (when sober) and he just needs to come out of his shell and realise that people appreciate him for his talent and for who he is. Perhaps that will help him in the future when playing live with Depeche Mode or on his own.

Absolutely Vile

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Numnum on 07/12/03 at 02:29 p.m.

I think if Vince stayed with Depeche Mode they would now be on the Retro 80s tour with so many more 80s people now!!!

They wouldn't have been so successful and their biggest hit would have been just can't get enough!  :-[

Numnum

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Alice on 07/12/03 at 03:28 p.m.

I think Martin L Gore is better songwriter by a country mile.Since "Construction Time Again"(1983) album people began to notice Depeche Mode were not as other then current synthpop groups.He's matured a lot over the years.
If Vince Clarke stayed Depeche Mode would still sound very 80s.But I don't say he's not talented.I find him a real synth prodigy.But now at the beginning of the 21st century this is just not it.
I'm a long term Depeche Mode fan and have all their records in my collection.

Subject: Re: Vince Clarke vs. Martin L. Gore

Written By: Absolutely_Vile on 07/13/03 at 02:56 a.m.

At the risk of repeating myself, I'll say this:

When Vince was with Depeche Mode, they sounded like a prototype for Erasure. So, if Vince had stuck around, they would have turned into Erasure. The rest of the band would have gotten frustrated with the fluffy crap that Vince was writing, and they would have split up, or kicked him out. Then they would have inevitably ended up as has-beens reforming every now and again playing hotel bars and casinos and retro festivals.

Incidentally, what have Erasure done since the early 90's? They had a hit in 1994 with "Always," disappeared, and have come back with a cover album which appears to be going nowhere. Their cover of "Video Killed The Radio Star" is bloody awful!!! I haven't heard anything else from it, but the prospect of fluffing up a brilliant song like "Solsbury Hill" mortifies me. Why are they still around? And if Vince Clarke is such a genius, why can't he do anything different than what he's been doing for the past God-knows-how-many years? At least Martin Gore can experiment!!! Maybe Erasure could learn a thing or two from Depeche Mode and do some experimenting of their own with their sound, and maybe then they might have better staying power and success!

Absolutely Vile