The Pop Culture Information Society...
These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.
Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.
This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.
Check for new replies or respond here...
Subject: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/10/18 at 2:17 pm
I will NOT speak for the late 2010s. They are awful and will never bring me nostalgia whatsoever.
But the early 2010s were great. They really make me happy. In April 2010 I turned 8 and I had a huge party. I got a new game I can't remember the name of. I went to a bowling alley and I crushed the competition!! For Christmas 2010, I got a Wii AND a new Xbox Live subscription!
For 2011 I went to the beach and developed a crush on an anime girl named Tiff. She was a kirby character and my 9 year old self was taught what love is. :)
2012 might have been the best year of my life, only rivaled by 2007 or 2009. In April I was 10 and I got an iPod. It was the best.
My favorite shows were Regular Show, KND, Pokemon, Sonic X and Kirby. I had so many friends in school.
But after 2012 it got bad. 2013 was really bad. I lost friends, had to be homeschooled, I took awful medication that made my autism spike, and I was depressed. It was a nightmare.
And it's been this way for years. I hate the 2010s so much. On the subject of how everyone hates the late 2000s, maybe they were born ten years earlier than me and went through what i'm going through, just in the mid-late 2000s. I disagree personally. The video game industry is in what I would call a dark age with dissapointing games like Tony Hawk Pro Skater 5 in 2015 and Star Wars Battlefront in 2017 and the Xbox One and Wii U kinda failing. It wasn't this way in the early 2010s. There are masterpieces like GTA V and The Last of Us, but they are sparce. Microtransactions weren't dominant and ruining otherwise good games, Pay to win games were rare, YouTube gaming channels had variety, and there were just better games. Forza 4, Halo Reach, Black Ops 1 and 2, Minecraft (back in the early days when it was actually good), Battlefield 3, NFS Hot Pursuit (2010 game), and of course Super Mario Galaxy 2.
I may not have nostalgia for the rest of the decade, but the early 2010s I could see the 2000-2005 borns proud to have lived through the early part of the decade. That includes me. I'm glad to be a 2000s/early 2010s hybrid, because you get to experience both the 2000s and the good part of the 2010s in childhood. Overall, the early 10s were just carefree, and the only good part of the decade before things screwed up bad.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/10/18 at 3:39 pm
I agree, i favor the early 2010s more than the late part of this decade, to be honest i prefer the mid 2010s over the late 2010s. I have nostalgia for 2012-2014 but moslty 2010-2014, i got a pet bird for my 7th birthday in 2011, Christmas of 2012 was awesome, 2012-2013 school year will always be my favorite school year, i have alot of elementary school memories from 2010-2011 and i remember alot of nostalgic songs from those years, 2014 was also awesome i got Smash Bros for 3DS and a 2DS in December 2014 and had the best 10th birthday party that year also, met an awesome friend that year also. In 2012 i got a Wii for christmas of that year i had Super Mario Galaxy 2, i also got it again in 2013 after my mom pawned it.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: xris on 08/10/18 at 5:01 pm
Me too, I loved the 2010s. I didn't realize how good pop culture actually was back then, but I deffinitely listened to more pop music and got into more TV shows back then than ever before. I'd say that, the early 2010s (and also 2009) culture was the best era since the early 90s. The late 90s and early-mid 2000s were mostly full of dross culture save for a few gems. Only Latin American and Continential European culture was good in those days, but British and American ones were bad. The first wave of Turskish TV series started in 2010. They replaced Latin American telenovelas in popularity. The older ones from the 2000s and early 10s were better than the 2015+ ones, although now even Latin American watches them. I liked Community and Modern Family from the US ones. The second part of 2014 changed everything in pop to worse with All About That Bass.
For my life, in 2010 and 2011 I was living in a little town in the mountains where I went to college. Got my first smartphone in 2011. In 2012 I did some temp jobs where they played pop hits all day. I was listening to lots of pop music in those days. In 2013 I switched to Windows 7 at home finally after years on XP. I beta-tested Windows 8. The winter of 2013/14 was perfect (+5-10 C daily). It had very few snowy days and I found the rainy and foggy days romantic. I was on top of the world, the happiest I've ever been since my early childhood.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/10/18 at 7:49 pm
Me too, I loved the 2010s. I didn't realize how good pop culture actually was back then, but I deffinitely listened to more pop music and got into more TV shows back then than ever before. I'd say that, the early 2010s (and also 2009) culture was the best era since the early 90s. The late 90s and early-mid 2000s were mostly full of dross culture save for a few gems. Only Latin American and Continential European culture was good in those days, but British and American ones were bad. The first wave of Turskish TV series started in 2010. They replaced Latin American telenovelas in popularity. The older ones from the 2000s and early 10s were better than the 2015+ ones, although now even Latin American watches them. I liked Community and Modern Family from the US ones. The second part of 2014 changed everything in pop to worse with All About That Bass.
For my life, in 2010 and 2011 I was living in a little town in the mountains where I went to college. Got my first smartphone in 2011. In 2012 I did some temp jobs where they played pop hits all day. I was listening to lots of pop music in those days. In 2013 I switched to Windows 7 at home finally after years on XP. I beta-tested Windows 8. The winter of 2013/14 was perfect (+5-10 C daily). It had very few snowy days and I found the rainy and foggy days romantic. I was on top of the world, the happiest I've ever been since my early childhood.
In Eastern Canada/Northeast US/Great Lakes region, the early 2010s winters were so warm. It barely snowed. I remember in late 2009 it didn't snow until December! (usually first snow is in late October/early November). In 2012, summer almost appeared to start in March when there was a heatwave at the end of the month, it got up to 26°C at my location :o
The winters of the mid-late 2010s on the other hand have been really brutal (except 2016/2017). In February 2015, temperatures never got above freezing point for the entire month. :-\\
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/14/18 at 4:42 pm
Tbh glad Teen Pop made a comeback in the early 10s when I was myself a teenager so I had sh!t like this that was popular around the times I had myself heartaches to connect to lol
qUn1tzyTYeo
I call it Heart Breakstep
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/14/18 at 5:30 pm
Tbh glad Teen Pop made a comeback in the early 10s when I was myself a teenager so I had sh!t like this that was popular around the times I had myself heartaches to connect to lol
qUn1tzyTYeo
I call it Heart Breakstep
Loool this was my favourite driving song for a while ;D
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 08/14/18 at 8:02 pm
I will NOT speak for the late 2010s. They are awful and will never bring me nostalgia whatsoever.
Don't speak so soon lol. I thought the same about the late 2000s at one point.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/14/18 at 8:18 pm
Don't speak so soon lol. I thought the same about the late 2000s at one point.
True, i'm already know that i will have nostalgia for 2017 sometime in the future. But as of right now i'm kinda feeling the same way frodomar is feeling about the late 2010s.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Lizardmatum on 08/17/18 at 3:25 pm
I relate man.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: batfan2005 on 08/18/18 at 9:08 am
So far the late 2010's have been an improvement over the mid-10's even though that's not saying much. The mid 10's were awful, except 2015 (and maybe late 2014 and early '16). But the early 10's were better.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/18/18 at 9:18 am
So far the late 2010's have been an improvement over the mid-10's even though that's not saying much. The mid 10's were awful, except 2015 (and maybe late 2014 and early '16). But the early 10's were better.
The late 2010s has been decent IMO, i prefer the Mid 2010s imo.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/18/18 at 12:21 pm
I really don't like the mid-2010s. At all.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/29/18 at 4:59 pm
So far the late 2010's have been an improvement over the mid-10's even though that's not saying much. The mid 10's were awful, except 2015 (and maybe late 2014 and early '16). But the early 10's were better.
If anything I think they're even worse right now. 2014 was so boring and mediocre it's actually a bad year because of that.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/29/18 at 5:01 pm
So far the late 2010's have been an improvement over the mid-10's even though that's not saying much. The mid 10's were awful, except 2015 (and maybe late 2014 and early '16). But the early 10's were better.
I disagree. The late 2010s are terrible and even worse than the mid-2010s.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 5:42 am
"Call Me Maybe" is pop perfection and shouldn't altered in any single way
I do agree though that 2013 was more minimal in production values and in especially in the summer you had hits like "Blurred Lines", "We Can't Stop" and "Royals" which would have been total UFOs earlier in the decade, as well as probably the peak of interest in indie stuff.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/31/18 at 6:02 am
Everything Carly Rae Jepsen releases is magical.
Even after all these years, every time I listen to E-MO-TION is like https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: aja675 on 08/31/18 at 6:04 am
Everything Carly Rae Jepsen releases is magical.
Even after all these years, every time I listen to E-MO-TION is like https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
Crying waffle smilie. :P
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 6:10 am
Everything Carly Rae Jepsen releases is magical.
Even after all these years, every time I listen to E-MO-TION is like https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
RUN AWAY WITH ME
https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/31/18 at 6:25 am
RUN AWAY WITH ME
https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
In your black heart is where you'll find me. Waiting. https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 11:02 am
I used Audacity to edit Call Me Maybe. ;D I removed the most annoying bits of music/singing like "where you think you're going baby" and some screeching sounds. Basically I removed most of the choruses and the high-pirched lines like "try to chaaaaase me". It's much improved!
I extended the middle 8 a lot (the bad bad bad bad... part), so it's more like it can be renamed to "Missed You So Bad". :)
It's a great song once you remove those annoying things, much better than anything post-2014! It even had strings like those 70s pop/disco songs that used real instruments! One no longer hears strings on radio much nowadays. The nostalgia is great, it instantly takes me back to the summer of 2012. I think 2013 also had good music, but most of it was in the early part of the year. Most summer hits in 2013 were less catchy than those from 2010-2012 and kinda moody. Royals and Get Lucky etc. are fun songs but somehow they don't fuel my nostalgia as much.
Here's how my edited version goes and it's much better imo, it clocks at 2 minute 07 sec. and you can do it like that in Audacity :):
I threw a wish in the well
Don't ask me I'll never tell
I looked to you as it fell
And now you're in my way
I'd trade my soul for a wish
Pennies and dimes for a kiss
I wasn't looking for this.
(some verses removed, no chorus)
You took your time with the call
I took no time with the fall
You gave me nothing at all
But still you're in my way
I beg and borrow and steal
At first sight and it's real
I didn't know I would feel it
But it's in my way
(Reduced chorus + extended middle 8 ):
So so bad
Before you came into my life
I missed you so bad
And you should know that
I missed you so so bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
So so bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
So so bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
So so bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
So so bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
So so bad
Bad bad bad bad bad bad bad
(again mostly no chorus save for the last 3 lines):
It's hard to look right at you baby
But here's my number
So call me maybe.
I don't like Call Me Maybe.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/31/18 at 11:22 am
Everything Carly Rae Jepsen releases is magical.
Even after all these years, every time I listen to E-MO-TION is like https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
Its crazy how at one point, on these forums, that many users contributed the rise of Carly Rae Jespen as the 'dawn' of mid 2010s pop culture. Ohhh..... How times have changed ;D.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/31/18 at 12:23 pm
Its crazy how at one point, on these forums, that many users contributed the rise of Carly Rae Jespen as the 'dawn' of mid 2010s pop culture. Ohhh..... How times have changed ;D.
It didn't make any sense to Canadian me. Carly was huge in 2011. I remember everyone using "call me maybe" as a pickup line throughout 2011-2012 school year when I was a uni freshman. It's like the peak early 2010s song to me. ;D
But ha magnum opus E-MO-TION is mid-2010s pop perfection. 8)
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 12:50 pm
I feel like people born from 1997-2002 are in their own generation. Aren't old enough to be Y but can't relate to the cringey Jake Paulers (no offense to mature kids out there).
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 2:31 pm
MY GIRL CARLY GIVING MY HEART SUPPORT WITH HER MASTERPIECES :\'( :\'( :\'( :\'( :\'(
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/31/18 at 2:32 pm
I feel like people born from 1997-2002 are in their own generation. Aren't old enough to be Y but can't relate to the cringey Jake Paulers (no offense to mature kids out there).
There is a Jake Paul fan who was born in the late '90s on here isn't there?
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/31/18 at 2:34 pm
MY GIRL CARLY GIVING MY HEART SUPPORT WITH HER MASTERPIECES :\'( :\'( :\'( :\'( :\'(
Her impact! I heard from my doctor that listening to her songs daily is important for sexual virility. https://www.kanyetothe.com/forum/Smileys/default/HWaQd6Z.png
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 2:34 pm
I feel like people born from 1997-2002 are in their own generation. Aren't old enough to be Y but can't relate to the cringey Jake Paulers (no offense to mature kids out there).
I CAN'T RELATE TO LOVE DOES THAT MAKE ME MY OWN GENERATION
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 2:37 pm
There is a Jake Paul fan who was born in the late '90s on here isn't there?
I mean no one can relate to Jake Paul fanboys.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/31/18 at 3:04 pm
I feel like people born from 1997-2002 are in their own generation. Aren't old enough to be Y but can't relate to the cringey Jake Paulers (no offense to mature kids out there).
It's not like anybody born in 2002 isn't one.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 3:07 pm
It's not like anybody born in 2002 isn't one.
Most aren't though.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/31/18 at 3:11 pm
Most aren't though.
And not everybody born in 2003 and 2004 aren't either, you don't know there could be a bunch of Jake Paul fans born in 2002 also. And i don't see 1997-2002 as one generation imo.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 3:29 pm
And not everybody born in 2003 and 2004 aren't either, you don't know there could be a bunch of Jake Paul fans born in 2002 also. And i don't see 1997-2002 a one generation imo.
Well people like Durv, JoJo Siwa, Sophia Grace, MattyB, and Carson Johns were born in 2003 and are mostly 10s kids so I excluded 2003 babies even though it's possible that they mostly aren't Jake Paulers, they have a higher chance than 2002 babies probably, that are BARELY 00s kids.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/31/18 at 3:43 pm
Well people like Durv, JoJo Siwa, Sophia Grace, MattyB, and Carson Johns were born in 2003 and are mostly 10s kids so I excluded 2003 babies even though it's possible that they mostly aren't Jake Paulers, they have a higher chance than 2002 babies probably, that are BARELY 00s kids.
2003 borns can have a late 2000s underlap, mostly leaning to early 2010s.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 08/31/18 at 3:45 pm
Well people like Durv, JoJo Siwa, Sophia Grace, MattyB, and Carson Johns were born in 2003 and are mostly 10s kids so I excluded 2003 babies even though it's possible that they mostly aren't Jake Paulers, they have a higher chance than 2002 babies probably, that are BARELY 00s kids.
2002 and 2003 babies are 99% the same. Get over yourself bruh.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 3:52 pm
2002 and 2003 babies are 99% the same. Get over yourself bruh.
I don't know, from my experiences 2003 babies at my local school, I can't relate to them much at all.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 3:53 pm
ME I AM THE SAME WITH 2003 BORNS CUZ WERE BOTH HUMANS
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 3:53 pm
2003 BORNS ARE KING AMONG PEASANTS
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 08/31/18 at 3:55 pm
DONT MESS WITH MY 2003 BORNS PALS CUZ I WILL MAKE U NOT RELATE TO ANYTHING IF SO 8-P 8-P 8-P
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 3:59 pm
DONT MESS WITH MY 2003 BORNS PALS CUZ I WILL MAKE U NOT RELATE TO ANYTHING IF SO 8-P 8-P 8-P
I do know one born in 2003 that I like and can relate to.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: SmartBo1 on 08/31/18 at 4:04 pm
I don't know, from my experiences 2003 babies at my local school, I can't relate to them much at all.
You can't relate to people a year younger then you? ;D ;D ;D I have a couple friends born in 2003 that I relate to just fine.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 4:09 pm
2002 and 2003 babies are 99% the same. Get over yourself bruh.
Well if there's a 99% similarity, the 1% difference is that one is a 2000s kid and the other one isn't.
Not a night and day difference between someone born in 2002 and 2003 though. Someone born 12/31/02 and one born 1/1/03 only have one difference: one is born in 2002, one is born in 2003.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/31/18 at 5:50 pm
Well if there's a 99% similarity, the 1% difference is that one is a 2000s kid and the other one isn't.
Not a night and day difference between someone born in 2002 and 2003 though. Someone born 12/31/02 and one born 1/1/03 only have one difference: one is born in 2002, one is born in 2003.
You can relate to 2003 borns, stop being ageist.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 08/31/18 at 6:56 pm
It didn't make any sense to Canadian me. Carly was huge in 2011. I remember everyone using "call me maybe" as a pickup line throughout 2011-2012 school year when I was a uni freshman. It's like the peak early 2010s song to me. ;D
But ha magnum opus E-MO-TION is mid-2010s pop perfection. 8)
I agree. Her style of music wasn't even that revolutionary actually..... it really wasn't revolutionary :-X
It sounded like a typical early 2010s pop song. Actually, in all honesty when I first heard this song in high school I could've sworn it was Taylor Swift singing it, low & behold it was Jespen. Her vocals, beats, & style of music was very similar to that early 10s 'Princess pop' sh!t (sh!t that I guiltily liked :-[) common in Swift, Katy Perry, Kesha, etc.
Back then & now, I just don't see how her sound could've ushered in the mid 2010s. Now 'Thrift Shop' by Macklemore on the other hand 8).
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 8:00 pm
You can relate to 2003 borns, stop being ageist.
I'm not. Did you NOT see what I said while describing 2002 and 2003 babies? I said that there wasn't even a night and day difference between a 2002 and 2003 born. In fact I get along with some 2003 babies.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 08/31/18 at 8:45 pm
I'm not. Did you NOT see what I said while describing 2002 and 2003 babies? I said that there wasn't even a night and day difference between a 2002 and 2003 born. In fact I get along with some 2003 babies.
What about that post you made saying "2003-2012: Horrible humans" and that reddit post saying how you hate 10s kids? It doesn't even get more ageist than that, even people on reddit think your account was just made on bashing people born after 2002, now that's nice that you get along with 2003 borns but you really need to low down on the complaining about kids of today and how they're different from people born in your supposedly "1997-2002" generation.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 08/31/18 at 9:51 pm
What about that post you made saying "2003-2012: Horrible humans" and that reddit post saying how you hate 10s kids? It doesn't even get more ageist than that, even people on reddit think your account was just made on bashing people born after 2002, now that's nice that you get along with 2003 borns but you really need to low down on the complaining about kids of today and how they're different from people born in your supposedly "1997-2002" generation.
I was trolling the teenagers community. I don't think that.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 09/01/18 at 3:14 am
2002 and 2003 babies are 99% the same. Get over yourself bruh.
2002 babies & 2003 babies are the same and grew up the same way.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 09/01/18 at 3:32 am
I absolutely can't relate with people born a minute after me, I think we had very different childhoods. But I can relate to people born 11 years before me though.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: ofkx on 09/01/18 at 3:48 am
Its crazy how at one point, on these forums, that many users contributed the rise of Carly Rae Jespen as the 'dawn' of mid 2010s pop culture. Ohhh..... How times have changed ;D.
It hurts how early 2010s Call Me Maybe is ;D. Literally 0 in common with mid 2010s.
I don't know, from my experiences 2003 babies at my local school, I can't relate to them much at all.
As a 2002 born, I can perfectly relate to 2003 babies. Pretty weird of you to not be able relate to people a year younger than you, no offense.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 09/01/18 at 3:49 am
I agree. Her style of music wasn't even that revolutionary actually..... it really wasn't revolutionary :-X
It sounded like a typical early 2010s pop song. Actually, in all honesty when I first heard this song in high school I could've sworn it was Taylor Swift singing it, low & behold it was Jespen. Her vocals, beats, & style of music was very similar to that early 10s 'Princess pop' sh!t (sh!t that I guiltily liked :-[) common in Swift, Katy Perry, Kesha, etc.
Back then & now, I just don't see how her sound could've ushered in the mid 2010s. Now 'Thrift Shop' by Macklemore on the other hand 8).
I don't think it especially sounds like your typical early '10 song. It has a nice usage of rearranged disco strings and subtler buildups to the chorus, and it has a nice sugary simplicity which I think gets overwhelming in Katy and Taylor songs.
It actually could have easily been a Y2K teen pop song if you slower the bpm a bit and replace the cutesy, hipstery fashion in the clip with Y2K aesthetics :D.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: ofkx on 09/01/18 at 3:52 am
I don't think it especially sounds like your typical early '10 song. It has a nice usage of rearranged disco strings and subtler buildups to the chorus, and it has a nice sugary simplicity which I think gets overwhelming in Katy and Taylor songs.
It actually could have easily been a Y2K teen pop song if you just replace the cutesy, hipstery fashion in the clip with Y2K aesthetics :D.
Just out of curiosity, what do you consider to be a typical early 2010s song?
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 09/01/18 at 6:26 am
I absolutely can't relate with people born a minute after me, I think we had very different childhoods. But I can relate to people born 11 years before me though.
https://www.reactiongifs.us/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/absolutely_right_zoolander.gif
I don't think it especially sounds like your typical early '10 song. It has a nice usage of rearranged disco strings and subtler buildups to the chorus, and it has a nice sugary simplicity which I think gets overwhelming in Katy and Taylor songs.
It actually could have easily been a Y2K teen pop song if you slower the bpm a bit and replace the cutesy, hipstery fashion in the clip with Y2K aesthetics :D.
That's an interesting analysis. Yeah I'll admit that it did have more of a teenybopper vibe that reckons back to the Late 90s. However, I think the instrumentation that was utilized in the song sounds proto early 10s. It was a mixture of almost all genres.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: mc98 on 09/01/18 at 8:32 am
While late 2013 and early 2014 has growing mid-2010s stuff, that doesn't mean the early 2010s have completely died. Songs like "Timber", "The Fox", "Applause" and "The Monster" sounds so early 2010s to me. Plus, Call Me Maybe to me is the definitive early 2010s song.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 8:41 am
While late 2013 and early 2014 has growing mid-2010s stuff, that doesn't mean the early 2010s have completely died. Songs like "Timber", "The Fox", "Applause" and "The Monster" sounds so early 2010s to me. Plus, Call Me Maybe to me is the definitive early 2010s song.
2014 was also when ISIS became an issue and when the SJW vs. Alt-right drama started.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 8:43 am
While late 2013 and early 2014 has growing mid-2010s stuff, that doesn't mean the early 2010s have completely died. Songs like "Timber", "The Fox", "Applause" and "The Monster" sounds so early 2010s to me. Plus, Call Me Maybe to me is the definitive early 2010s song.
Those are all from mid-late 2013.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: mc98 on 09/01/18 at 8:45 am
I know. What I am saying is that there are some late 2013 songs that sound early 2010s. While numerically, late 2013 is mid-2010s but that doesn't mean early 2010s culture died out instantly in mid-late 2013.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 10:34 am
2003 BORNS ARE KING AMONG PEASANTS
I miss your old forum picture.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 09/01/18 at 10:43 am
2003 BORNS ARE KING AMONG PEASANTS
2003 isn't really a king among peasants at all. There isn't much of a difference between them and someone born in 2007 really.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 09/01/18 at 10:49 am
2003 isn't really a king among peasants at all. There isn't much of a difference between them and someone born in 2007 really.
Nah 2003 and 2007 borns are extremely different since their childhoods aren't exactly matching to the second. I don't think they're even part of the same species.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 09/01/18 at 10:57 am
I know. What I am saying is that there are some late 2013 songs that sound early 2010s. While numerically, late 2013 is mid-2010s but that doesn't mean early 2010s culture died out instantly in mid-late 2013.
The last hit song that sounds distinctly "early 2010s" would potentially be this one from 2014, which was maybe helped getting huge by the fact Ariana was a fresh new sensation back then.
L8eRzOYhLuw
It has booming trance pads like many early 10s hits had, as well as empowering lyrics which heavily used too back then (Not Afraid, Firework, Born This Way, Raise Your Glass, and so on).
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/01/18 at 1:53 pm
I've already said this before (but with 90's babies instead) early 2000's babies aren't that different from late 2000's / early 2010's babies. It has nothing to do with generations or this stupid "Y" or "Z" trait stuff. How are you going to relate to someone that is still in elementary school while you're more than halfway through high school probably already driving and thinking about college? Y'all will barely find any differences when you guys are much older. The same goes for late 90's babies and late 2000's babies.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: mc98 on 09/01/18 at 2:08 pm
The last hit song that sounds distinctly "early 2010s" would potentially be this one from 2014, which was maybe helped getting huge by the fact Ariana was a fresh new sensation back then.
L8eRzOYhLuw
It has booming trance pads like many early 10s hits had, as well as empowering lyrics which heavily used too back then (Not Afraid, Firework, Born This Way, Raise Your Glass, and so on).
Break Free does sound like an early 2010s song. I would say this song below sounds a little bit like the early 2010s.
bTXJQ5ql5Fw
This song was a hit in early 2015.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 09/01/18 at 2:21 pm
Nah 2003 and 2007 borns are extremely different since their childhoods aren't exactly matching to the second. I don't think they're even part of the same species.
If the famous 2003 babies like JoJo Siwa or Sophia Grace are of any indication 2003 and 2007 borns barely have much of a difference. I mean JoJo Siwa still acts like a kid, just like someone like Ruby Rube.
2003 babies are still 10s kids, just older 10s kids. Hell, 2007 babies could still have lived through being a kid in 2012, they were 5. 5 year olds are still kids. Still though, 2003-2007 babies all seem similar to each other. 2003 and 2004 babies are both 10s kids and in high school. 2005, 2006 and 2007 babies are all with each other in middle school (providing 2007 babies were born on or before 9/1/07, going by the cutoff in most states), and all people from 2003-2007 are 10s kids, just different types. I might be nitpicking about 2003 babies, but look at 2002 and 2003 babies, 16 and 15 year olds. There are many differences. A 16 year old can drive to work, get a job, and can have sex. 15 year olds cannot do these things. To be fair 2003 babies will be 16 in 2019, but still, that's the last year of the 2010s. In fact, someone born in November or December 2003 will be 15 for damn near all of 2019.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: SmartBo1 on 09/01/18 at 2:32 pm
If the famous 2003 babies like JoJo Siwa or Sophia Grace are of any indication 2003 and 2007 borns barely have much of a difference. I mean JoJo Siwa still acts like a kid, just like someone like Ruby Rube.
2003 babies are still 10s kids, just older 10s kids. Hell, 2007 babies could still have lived through being a kid in 2012, they were 5. 5 year olds are still kids. Still though, 2003-2007 babies all seem similar to each other. 2003 and 2004 babies are both 10s kids and in high school. 2005, 2006 and 2007 babies are all with each other in middle school (providing 2007 babies were born on or before 9/1/07, going by the cutoff in most states), and all people from 2003-2007 are 10s kids, just different types. I might be nitpicking about 2003 babies, but look at 2002 and 2003 babies, 16 and 15 year olds. There are many differences. A 16 year old can drive to work, get a job, and can have sex. 15 year olds cannot do these things. To be fair 2003 babies will be 16 in 2019, but still, that's the last year of the 2010s. In fact, someone born in November or December 2003 will be 15 for damn near all of 2019.
Dude just give it up already. You're gonna end up getting your own thread locked.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 2:36 pm
I pity the children/teens growing up in the mid-late 10s with bad music. :) But then again we 90's children/00s teens also grew up with mostly sucky music. While the 00s got better in the very last 2 years, the 10s were better imo early on. I agree that 2014 changed everything.
You know, let's just go by The Early 90's Guy's definition of the early 2010's, which was 2011 to 2014.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 2:40 pm
Pre-2014:
http://popcrush.com/files/2011/01/Katy-Perry-3002.jpg?w=980&q=75
Post-2014:
https://superfame.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/jacob-sartorius-cute.jpg
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 2:43 pm
Dude just give it up already. You're gonna end up getting your own thread locked.
I agree with you.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 09/01/18 at 3:05 pm
Dude just give it up already. You're gonna end up getting your own thread locked.
I will as soon as you people understand that 2002 and 2003 babies are different (right now at least).
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Longaotian00 on 09/01/18 at 4:33 pm
I will as soon as you people understand that 2002 and 2003 babies are different (right now at least).
NO. No one agrees that 2002 and 2003 babies are different because they ARE NOT DIFFERENT.. I'm surprised you haven't been banned. You're by far the worst member of the forum, even more so than that annoying John Titor chick, and thats saying something.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: unicornic on 09/01/18 at 4:43 pm
I've already said this before (but with 90's babies instead) early 2000's babies aren't that different from late 2000's / early 2010's babies. It has nothing to do with generations or this stupid "Y" or "Z" trait stuff. How are you going to relate to someone that is still in elementary school while you're more than halfway through high school probably already driving and thinking about college? Y'all will barely find any differences when you guys are much older. The same goes for late 90's babies and late 2000's babies.
https://media1.giphy.com/media/GE5GKLJYSHRss/giphy.gif
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 5:07 pm
If the famous 2003 babies like JoJo Siwa or Sophia Grace are of any indication 2003 and 2007 borns barely have much of a difference. I mean JoJo Siwa still acts like a kid, just like someone like Ruby Rube.
2003 babies are still 10s kids, just older 10s kids. Hell, 2007 babies could still have lived through being a kid in 2012, they were 5. 5 year olds are still kids. Still though, 2003-2007 babies all seem similar to each other. 2003 and 2004 babies are both 10s kids and in high school. 2005, 2006 and 2007 babies are all with each other in middle school (providing 2007 babies were born on or before 9/1/07, going by the cutoff in most states), and all people from 2003-2007 are 10s kids, just different types. I might be nitpicking about 2003 babies, but look at 2002 and 2003 babies, 16 and 15 year olds. There are many differences. A 16 year old can drive to work, get a job, and can have sex. 15 year olds cannot do these things. To be fair 2003 babies will be 16 in 2019, but still, that's the last year of the 2010s. In fact, someone born in November or December 2003 will be 15 for damn near all of 2019.
Ruby Rube was born in January of 2006.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/01/18 at 5:11 pm
I will as soon as you people understand that 2002 and 2003 babies are different (right now at least).
The only difference between someone born in 2002 and someone born in 2003 is a one year age difference.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/01/18 at 5:14 pm
The only difference between someone born in 2002 and someone born in 2003 is a one year age difference.
The only difference if anything is that a 2002 born will be able to vote two years from now whereas someone born in 2003 can't.
Other than that, they are essentially the same.
Frodomar is basically like Cooldudez.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: mwalker1996 on 09/01/18 at 5:29 pm
I've already said this before (but with 90's babies instead) early 2000's babies aren't that different from late 2000's / early 2010's babies. It has nothing to do with generations or this stupid "Y" or "Z" trait stuff. How are you going to relate to someone that is still in elementary school while you're more than halfway through high school probably already driving and thinking about college? Y'all will barely find any differences when you guys are much older. The same goes for late 90's babies and late 2000's babies.
Thank you Rainbow. It's not about generation or decade kid stuff it's about how you were raised. I mean sure your birth year can play a part in your upbringing but that doesn't mean all 90s kids or 2000s kids grew up the same. I know tons of 2010s kids who didn't grow up tech-savy. I know plenty of teens who don't know what Discord is, but someone like me (who's supposed to be out of touch with the teen culture at this point in my life) knows about Discord. I remember last year in college I had a classmate born in 2000 who was homeschooled, he never'd done a powerpoint before so I showed him how to make one. The point is don't get so hung up on age. I have tons of friends born in the 2000s that I have more in common with then people my age.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 09/01/18 at 5:31 pm
Remember the early 00s Android emojis?
https://emojipedia.org/google/android-4.4/
Me when I see the "2002 vs 2003 borns discussion" still going on: https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/320/google/6/expressionless-face_1f611.png
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/01/18 at 6:09 pm
Me when I see the "2002 vs 2003 borns discussion" still going on: https://emojipedia-us.s3.dualstack.us-west-1.amazonaws.com/thumbs/320/google/6/expressionless-face_1f611.png
;D ;D ;D
He's probably just a troll. Don't feed him anymore. ;D
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 09/01/18 at 6:30 pm
Remember the early 00s Android emojis?
https://emojipedia.org/google/android-4.4/
I thought the early 10s ones were the Androids.
https://phandroid.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Screenshot_2012-07-01-15-22-09-259x4001.png
TBH I still used kaomojis in the early 2010s à la ヽ(>∀<☆)ノ (I had an app that made it easy to copy and paste them :D)
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/01/18 at 6:47 pm
;D ;D ;D
He's probably just a troll. Don't feed him anymore. ;D
He is lmfao, look at his freaking reddit page.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/01/18 at 11:11 pm
The only difference if anything is that a 2002 born will be able to vote two years from now whereas someone born in 2003 can't.
Other than that, they are essentially the same.
Frodomar is basically like Cooldudez.
Frodomar just doesn't wanna relate with somebody one year younger than him, he just wants to fit with the older generation especially his 1997-2002 "generation". Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: HazelBlue99 on 09/02/18 at 2:29 am
I will as soon as you people understand that 2002 and 2003 babies are different (right now at least).
If there's any difference at all between people born in 2002 and 2003, it would only be that someone born in 2002 may have a better recollection of the 2000s. That's it. Other than that, there is no difference at all between someone born in 2002 and another person born in 2003.
Also, you need to keep in mind that your perception of someone doesn't define everyone else of that same age. Just because you don't like JoJo Siwa or Sophia Grace, doesn't mean that every other person born in 2003 acts in the same manner.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: KatanaChick on 09/02/18 at 3:40 am
I will NOT speak for the late 2010s. They are awful and will never bring me nostalgia whatsoever.
But the early 2010s were great. They really make me happy. In April 2010 I turned 8 and I had a huge party. I got a new game I can't remember the name of. I went to a bowling alley and I crushed the competition!! For Christmas 2010, I got a Wii AND a new Xbox Live subscription!
You peaked at age 8?! ;D :o
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 09/02/18 at 9:51 am
You peaked at age 8?! ;D :o
I peaked at 7.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/18 at 10:00 am
Frodomar just doesn't wanna relate with somebody one year younger than him, he just wants to fit with the older generation especially his 1997-2002 "generation". Pretty pathetic if you ask me.
That's more like my generation if you ask me.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Frodomar2002 on 09/02/18 at 11:42 am
That's more like my generation if you ask me.
You are a late 00s kid like me. We are in the same generation
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/02/18 at 12:00 pm
You are a late 00s kid like me. We are in the same generation
If he's a late 2000's kid then you'd be an early 2010's kid.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 09/02/18 at 12:24 pm
You are a late 00s kid like me. We are in the same generation
1999 borns are different from 2002 borns (right now at least). One is in college and can vote and the other is in high school and won't be able to vote for a few more years. A 1999 born and 2002 born can't relate, they're different generations (right now).
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Rainbowz on 09/02/18 at 12:28 pm
1999 borns are different from 2002 borns (right now at least). One is in college and can vote and the other is in high school and won't be able to vote for a few more years. A 1999 born and 2002 born can't relate, they're different generations (right now).
I can relate to 1999 borns perfectly fine, but you're definitely right. Age does play a role and I feel like that's why a lot of late 90's babies distance themselves from mid-2000's babies since mid-2000's babies either just started high school or are still in middle school, while late 90's babies are in college and the oldest is 21 and can legally drink in the U.S.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 09/02/18 at 12:35 pm
I can relate to 1999 borns perfectly fine, but you're definitely right. Age does play a role and I feel like that's why a lot of late 90's babies distance themselves from mid-2000's babies since mid-2000's babies either just started high school or are still in middle school, while late 90's babies are in college and the oldest is 21 and can legally drink in the U.S.
Lol I was being sarcastic and using that guy's logic against him. He claims he can't relate to 2003 borns (although there is only a 1 year difference) because as a 2002 born, he can participate in more mature activities ;D. Yet he wants to be in the same cohort with 1999 borns who are 3 years older than him and can vote, go to college, or work full time jobs. So according to his logic, 1999 borns can't relate to him either but he finds himself trying to be in the same category with them. He's in delusion city if you ask me lol.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/18 at 12:40 pm
Lol I was being sarcastic and using that guy's logic against him. He claims he can't relate to 2003 borns (although there is only a 1 year difference) because as a 2002 born, he can participate in more mature activities ;D. Yet he wants to be in the same cohort with 1999 borns who are 3 years older than him and can vote, go to college, or work full time jobs. So according to his logic, 1999 borns can't relate to him either but he finds himself trying to be in the same category with them. He's in delusion city if you ask me lol.
Lol, on Reddit, he says that he can relate to a 1988 born but not a 2003 born.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Milk on 09/02/18 at 12:42 pm
As someone who was born in 1999 I can't relate to 2002 borns at all lol what is this guy saying
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 12:43 pm
Lol, on Reddit, he says that he can relate to a 1988 born but not a 2003 born.
That's more delusional, no 1988 born would even relate to a 16 year old like him. Most 1988 borns are paying bills, while he is still in highschool.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 12:43 pm
As someone who was born in 1999 I can't relate to 2002 borns at all lol what is this guy saying
Yep. Lol.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/18 at 12:48 pm
That's more delusional, no 1988 born would even relate to a 16 year old like him. Most 1988 borns are paying bills, while he is still in highschool.
Many 1988 borns own houses and even have children.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/18 at 12:51 pm
Frodomar2002 on Reddit:
"My friend named RickyCooper2006 was born in 1988, but he's scared to."
Frodomar2002, also on Reddit:
"I am not saying every 13-15 year old is an *******. I'm saying MOST are. MOST. Not all. Or at least from my experiences."
"And also JoJo Siwa was born in May 2003, so she is definitely a 10s kid and probably has her own Siwa fanbase consisting of 5-15 year olds"
"As my studies have shown, being born after 2002 could make you more bratty and spoiled, especially the core 10s kids (2005-2007)"
"You act so much like a 10s kid it hurts. I know someone born December 5 2002 and another born January 9 2003 and they're completely different people. That's why Dec 31 02 is the cutoff."
"If they're 14 they can't even talk about how great the 2000s were lol"
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 09/02/18 at 12:53 pm
Pretty sure Early10s Fan & F2002 come from the same cloth.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 12:56 pm
Pretty sure Early10s Fan & F2002 come from the same cloth.
Wait, they could be the same account :o ??? , other than that frodomar even lied that he was born in 1999 on reddit, i'm like wow this dude is really desperate.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/18 at 12:59 pm
Compare Frodomar to someone like Varg Vikernes (a neo-Nazi from Norway who burnt down churches and killed someone in the early 90's) and you'll find out that both of them have very similar ways of thinking.
Varg Vikernes believes that white people that are pagans are the only type of people who deserve to live.
Similarly, Frodomar2002 believes that people born before 2003 are the only ones who could talk about the 2000's.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 1:00 pm
Compare Frodomar to someone like Varg Vikernes and their mentality is VERY SIMILAR.
Varg Vikernes believes that white people that are pagans are the only type of people who deserve to live.
Similarly, Frodomar2002 believes that people born before 2003 are the only ones who could talk about the 2000's.
Frodomar is just an ageist, who doesn't like it when a person born after 2002 is breathing and living.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Tyrannosaurus Rex on 09/02/18 at 1:03 pm
Frodomar is just an ageist, who doesn't like it when a person born after 2002 is breathing and living.
Still, Frodomar and the Varg person I was talking about have extremely similar ways of thinking.
They live on hate, and the only stuff they can take pride of are things that were beyond their control (race, age, gender, etc). For Varg, it would be the fact that he is white, whereas for Frodomar, it would be the fact that he was born in 2002.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 1:04 pm
Still, Frodomar and the Varg person I was talking about have extremely similar ways of thinking.
They live on hate, and the only stuff they can take pride of are things that were beyond their control (race, age, gender, etc). For Varg, it would be the fact that he is white, whereas for Frodomar, it would be the fact that he was born in 2002.
As much as i hate racists, i hate ageist people also, like why does this frodomar guy even care about a 2007 or a 2009 born??
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 09/02/18 at 1:22 pm
What's wrong with you? ;D I've been posting here since 2008 at least. Back then I used guest acconts as it was possible.
I see people like to silence those prefering the early 10s. You will never succeed in deleting 2008-2013 from history.
Even if they lose their relevance everyone will remember the blast of greatness those years were. It was a new Renaissance for pop culture and music really.
You mind backing your claim of me trying to silence you with evidence?
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: piecesof93 on 09/02/18 at 1:23 pm
Still, Frodomar and the Varg person I was talking about have extremely similar ways of thinking.
They live on hate, and the only stuff they can take pride of are things that were beyond their control (race, age, gender, etc). For Varg, it would be the fact that he is white, whereas for Frodomar, it would be the fact that he was born in 2002.
nah F2002 is just a troll. He doesn't actually believes what he's saying.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 1:24 pm
You mind backing your claim of me trying to silence you with evidence?
If he's really posing on that account as an 1988 born, then he really has some serious issues.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: 2001 on 09/02/18 at 1:25 pm
I don't know any polite or politically correct way to say this, but I remember Frodomar2002 saying he was on the autism spectrum. I would go easy on him and not be too harsh, even though a lot of the arbitrary and ridiculous rules he places on who he can and cannot relate to make zero sense to us. :-X
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Wobo on 09/02/18 at 1:25 pm
I don't know any polite or politically correct way to say this, but I remember Frodomar2002 saying he was on the autism spectrum. I would go easy on him and not be too harsh, even though a lot of the arbitrary and ridiculous rules he places on who he can and cannot relate to make zero sense to us. :-X
Maybe his autism has to something to do with ageism?
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: Dundee on 09/02/18 at 1:59 pm
Be like me and just skip posts of people that aren't worth reading, and make fun of stuff once in a while :D
Ps: I've read a certain someone's Reddit by curiosity since it's talked about on here, and yeah, this whole 2000s vs 2010s kids stuff and the whole toxic attitude that goes with it is just getting to pathetic levels of retarded. What's with this constant need of putting people down for self-satisfaction in general? Can't we for once do a constructive excercise in nostalgia without the snobbish elitism that goes with. Like Ugh, I just can't stand this stuff.
Subject: Re: Early 2010s were great.
Written By: SeaCaptainMan97 on 09/02/18 at 3:09 pm
NSFW;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjBEQWA4wrE
Check for new replies or respond here...
Copyright 1995-2020, by Charles R. Grosvenor Jr.