» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society
Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Custom Search
This is a topic from the Current Politics and Religious Topics forum on inthe00s.
Subject: New York Times prints editoral with redactions intact
Written By: ChuckyG on 12/22/06 at 9:15 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/22/opinion/22leverett.html
The CIA cleared the editoral and said it contained no confidental information, yet the Bush Whitheouse begged to differ.
There's supposed to be a list of sources for the redacted information at the end of the information, because, surprise! It's all publically available elsewhere. The White House just doesn't want people to know.
Subject: Re: New York Times prints editoral with redactions intact
Written By: ChuckyG on 12/22/06 at 9:26 am
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/22/opinion/22precede.html?ex=1324443600&en=edb5b9af37bbf97d&ei=5090&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss
here's the sources, with an explanation of why they had to do it
Subject: Re: New York Times prints editoral with redactions intact
Written By: MaxwellSmart on 12/22/06 at 9:42 am
In the entrance to the C.I.A.
Subject: Re: New York Times prints editoral with redactions intact
Written By: CatwomanofV on 12/24/06 at 3:29 pm
Here is another article about it.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061222/ap_on_go_pr_wh/iran_classified_1
Just as we suspected-it was done for political reasons, NOT security reasons, which IMO is a voilation of the First Admendment.
Cat