The Pop Culture Information Society...

These are the messages that have been posted on inthe00s over the past few years.

Check out the messageboard archive index for a complete list of topic areas.

This archive is periodically refreshed with the latest messages from the current messageboard.

The 2000's 2017 Archive: (December) (November) (October) (September) (August) (July) (June) (May) (April) (March) (February) (January)

This is a topic from the The 2000's forum on inthe00s.

Check for new replies or respond here...

Subject: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Zelek3 on 06/05/17 at 9:47 pm

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7c/Movie_poster_looney_tunes_back_in_action.JPG

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/05/17 at 9:50 pm

I don't see any news of a Space Jam 2 happening ???. Also, Looney Tunes: Back in Action wasn't a sequel to Space Jam (but I think that you're facetious).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: #Infinity on 06/05/17 at 9:51 pm

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Zelek3 on 06/05/17 at 9:53 pm

I don't see any news of a Space Jam 2 happening ???.

They announced it in summer 2015.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/05/17 at 9:54 pm

They announced it in summer 2015.

Nothing's been confirmed....just speculation.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/05/17 at 9:57 pm

Because Looney Tunes: Back in Action was not only a huge box office bomb, it lacked the novelty of featuring an NBA star and did not have a soundtrack with several hit singles in addition to some delicious novelties. Space Jam is a relic of the 90s. Back in Action is the obscure sequel that everybody forgot about.

Even though I agree with you....I still like Looney Tunes: BIA. LT: BIA wasn't great (Space Jam wasn't either) but it was decent and fun. Or maybe it's because I was only 4? :-[

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: SpyroKev on 06/05/17 at 10:01 pm

Because Looney Tunes: Back in Action was not only a huge box office bomb, it lacked the novelty of featuring an NBA star and did not have a soundtrack with several hit singles in addition to some delicious novelties. Space Jam is a relic of the 90s. Back in Action is the obscure sequel that everybody forgot about.

I have to agree with this. Back In Action is fun when you watch it but the Monstars from Space Jam alone are incredibly well designed and memorable.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/05/17 at 10:08 pm

I have to agree with this. Back In Action is fun when you watch it but the Monstars from Space Jam alone are incredibly well designed and memorable.

Space Jam is definitely better than Back in Action. However, Space Jam is not some masterpiece like how many '90s kids think it is. It's an average film but it's fun and nostalgia filled.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/05/17 at 10:22 pm

Where was I when this came out? I don't remember watching this at all.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/05/17 at 10:26 pm

Where was I when this came out? I don't remember watching this at all.

Looney Tunes: Back in Action which came out in November 2003. Futurepoke you were 10 years old.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/06/17 at 1:30 pm

If a Space Jam sequel had actually been released, it would've flopped. That's probably why it was never released in September 2015. Plus, Looney Tunes is a dying franchise, believe it or not.

I imagine in order for a sequel to work, it would have to feature a celebrity like, I don't know, Justin Bieber? (LOL JK) And it would need another memorable soundtrack.

Basketball ain't what it used to be since Michael Jordan left, although one would argue that they could use Shaq, Derek Rose, or LeBron James, but still.

Sequels usually aren't better than the first, with the exception of classics like Star Wars, Batman, Toy Story, Shrek...

Those are my reasons why a Space Jam sequel would flop.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: SpyroKev on 06/06/17 at 1:42 pm

Space Jam is definitely better than Back in Action. However, Space Jam is not some masterpiece like how many '90s kids think it is. It's an average film but it's fun and nostalgia filled.

Space Jam definitely has that soul and history to it.
If a Space Jam sequel had actually been released, it would've flopped. That's probably why it was never released in September 2015. Plus, Looney Tunes is a dying franchise, believe it or not.

I imagine in order for a sequel to work, it would have to feature a celebrity like, I don't know, Justin Bieber? (LOL JK) And it would need another memorable soundtrack.

Basketball ain't what it used to be since Michael Jordan left, although one would argue that they could use Shaq, Derek Rose, or LeBron James, but still.

Sequels usually aren't better than the first, with the exception of classics like Star Wars, Batman, Toy Story, Shrek...

Those are my reasons why a Space Jam sequel would flop.

This is some good points. Looney Tunes is a dying franchise and I wish it wasn't like this. Aside from Bugs, Lola, Daffy and Porky, I see the rest as already forgotten.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/06/17 at 1:56 pm

If a Space Jam sequel had actually been released, it would've flopped. That's probably why it was never released in September 2015. Plus, Looney Tunes is a dying franchise, believe it or not.

I imagine in order for a sequel to work, it would have to feature a celebrity like, I don't know, Justin Bieber? (LOL JK) And it would need another memorable soundtrack.

Basketball ain't what it used to be since Michael Jordan left, although one would argue that they could use Shaq, Derek Rose, or LeBron James, but still.

Sequels usually aren't better than the first, with the exception of classics like Star Wars, Batman, Toy Story, Shrek...

Those are my reasons why a Space Jam sequel would flop.

How is it dying? ???

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: annimal on 06/06/17 at 2:00 pm

Where was I when this came out? I don't remember watching this at all.

I must have missed it too. Oh it's lunch time ( looks at Slowpoke with a grin)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/06/17 at 2:03 pm

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/06/17 at 3:16 pm

Why would anybody think LT: Back In Action is a sequel to Space Jam? Wasn't that simply its own film?

Because Looney Tunes: Back in Action was not only a huge box office bomb, it lacked the novelty of featuring an NBA star and did not have a soundtrack with several hit singles in addition to some delicious novelties. Space Jam is a relic of the 90s. Back in Action is the obscure sequel that everybody forgot about.

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

F A K E N E W S!!!!!!

LT: Back in Action was certainly better, especially towards how it had a great plot towards all of the Looney Tunes characters. Space Jam was overrated garbitch!! :P :P :P :P :P :P

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/06/17 at 5:03 pm

I must have missed it too. Oh it's lunch time ( looks at Slowpoke with a grin)

Don't eat my tail!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/06/17 at 7:03 pm

Yeah, Space Jam sucked pretty bad. Even as a lover of all things '90s, I can't deny that. Loved it as a kid, though.

I loved Space Jam as a kid as well. However, now I just have nostalgia for it but I also recognise that it wasn't a great film as I thought it was.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/06/17 at 7:04 pm

Plus, Looney Tunes is a dying franchise, believe it or not.

I highly disagree with this statement.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Looney Toon on 06/06/17 at 7:37 pm

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/06/17 at 7:44 pm

Space Jam was pretty terrible. Even the creator of Looney Tunes didn't even like the movie. I found Back in Action better since it was closer to what Looney Tunes was supposed to be. Although overall I think that both movies weren't all that great in the end. Only Live Action/Cartoon hybrid I liked was Who Framed Roger Rabbit.

Yeah, I pretty much agree with everything you said (except it wasn't the creator of the Looney Tunes who hated it...it was long time Looney Tunes director, Chuck Jones).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Looney Toon on 06/06/17 at 8:01 pm

Yeah, I pretty much agree with everything you said (except it wasn't the creator of the Looney Tunes who hated it...it was long time Looney Tunes director, Chuck Jones).

Whoops! Forgot that Looney Tunes doesn't a single person credited with running the series. There was Tex Avery, Bob Clampett, Chuck Jones, Robert McKimson etc.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/06/17 at 8:10 pm

Whoops! Forgot that Looney Tunes doesn't a single person credited with running the series. There was Tex Avery, Bob Clampett, Chuck Jones, Robert McKimson etc.

Yep.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/07/17 at 7:23 am

I highly disagree with this statement.

I think they're still popular.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Lizardmatum on 06/07/17 at 9:12 am

I preferred Back in Action as a kid and still do. Although I haven't watched either in years.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: #Infinity on 06/07/17 at 9:29 am

Why would anybody think LT: Back In Action is a sequel to Space Jam? Wasn't that simply its own film?

Technically, yes, it is a sequel, hence the title Back in Action.

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

F A K E N E W S!!!!!!

You can tell the highest-ranking man in America that the film didn't even make as much as its budget.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: SpyroKev on 06/07/17 at 10:19 am

I found Back in Action better since it was closer to what Looney Tunes was supposed to be.

I like how in BIA, Marvin The Martian was badassly manipulated. That movie gave his character debt on pair with Bugs and Daffy.
Technically, yes, it is a sequel, hence the title Back in Action.

I don't consider BIA a sequel. The plot of the movie had a completely different focus. Michael Jordan made a cameo but it could be just a shot out thing.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/07/17 at 11:06 am

Technically, yes, it is a sequel, hence the title Back in Action.

Well, I don't think that the Back in Action title refers to Space Jam. I think it just means that the Looney Tunes were back....in theaters and back in a live action/animation hybrid film.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/07/17 at 11:12 am

Technically, yes, it is a sequel, hence the title Back in Action.

But it never really referred to Space Jam, nor Michael Jordan, nor anything related to the NBA. It was basically a Looney Tunes live action/cartoon hybrid that Warner Bros. made for entertainment. Plus, there were other Looney Tunes movies released before Space Jam, so how could BIA be a sequel alone?

Unless you were joking and the whole statement was rather rhetorical.

You can tell the highest-ranking man in America that the film didn't even make as much as its budget.

It doesn't really matter if it was a box-office bomb. It's still a cult classic to many people.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/07/17 at 12:21 pm

Let me further explain why the Looney Tunes is a dying franchise to those who don't understand:

Looney Tunes merchandise hasn't been popular since the 90's, Warner Bros. stores shut down in the 00's, less people are watching television, the modern Looney Tunes cartoon on CN (forgot the name) stopped making new episodes due to low ratings, and most importantly, younger generations are less interested in oldies like the Looney Tunes and Tom & Jerry than older generations.

Times have changed. The Looney Tunes are inevitably becoming irrelevant. All good things must come to an end at some point. (That doesn't mean a number of people don't watch the Looney Tunes on YouTube for nostalgia.)

It's a dying franchise. By the next decade, the majority of little kids will be introduced to the Looney Tunes through YouTube, or an old VHS tape by their parents or schoolteacher. But will future generations really be all that interested in the Looney Tunes? Probably not. I rest my case.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/07/17 at 12:47 pm

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/07/17 at 12:59 pm

The Looney Tunes will NEVER die.
LOL All I'm saying is the Looney Tunes is becoming unpopular and is struggling to stay relevant with today's youth. That's what I mean by "Dying franchise".

On a side note, I find it ironic how someone from 1999 is defending the Looney Tunes. Most kids your age are obsessed with Steven Universe.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: SpyroKev on 06/07/17 at 1:10 pm

The Looney Tunes will NEVER die.

They won't die, man. There's just too many other new popular series within the same genre that clouds them.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/07/17 at 1:13 pm

LOL All I'm saying is the Looney Tunes is becoming unpopular and is struggling to stay relevant with today's youth. That's what I mean by "Dying franchise".

On a side note, I find it ironic how someone from 1999 is defending the Looney Tunes. Most kids your age are obsessed with Steven Universe.

I was basically born the same year as TheReignMan and I don't even enjoy Steven Universe. Most of its fanbase is actually riddled with early 2000s babies. But as somebody who enjoyed Hanna-Barbara cartoons more than Looney Tunes as a kid, that seems debatable.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/07/17 at 1:17 pm

I was basically born the same year as TheReignMan and I don't even enjoy Steven Universe. Most of its fanbase is actually riddled with early 2000s babies. But as somebody who enjoyed Hanna-Barbara cartoons more than Looney Tunes as a kid, that seems debatable.
'99 babies are in the same group as early 00's babies...

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/07/17 at 1:24 pm

'99 babies are in the same group as early 00's babies...

Well, with 2000 and early-mid 2001 babies. But with late 2001-2003 babies, in my opinion.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/07/17 at 2:19 pm

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/07/17 at 3:42 pm

On a side note, I find it ironic how someone from 1999 is defending the Looney Tunes. Most kids your age are obsessed with Steven Universe.

What's ironic about it? ???. You was born in 1996...and yet you think you're different from me, that's weird. Most of my friends do not obsess over Steven Universe. Also, people my age aren't kids for your information.

Side note: What's up with some of you 1995-1996 borns thinking that y'all are 10 years older than us 1999 borns? >:(

'99 babies are in the same group as early 00's babies...

That's mostly incorrect.

Anyways, here is video based on this topic:
mRnYPpymzrE

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Zelek3 on 06/07/17 at 7:30 pm

Side note: What's up with some of you 1995-1996 borns thinking that y'all are 10 years older than us 1999 borns? >:(
That's mostly incorrect.

Yeah, it does seem to be kind of peculiar, this trend of people born in the mid 90s making fun of people born in the late 90s for being "spoiled kids these days" or acting like they're 20 years older than them, despite not being THAT much older than them.

Like, there's this trend on Leddit and other normie sites, where people born in 97-99 are singled out for not being 90s kids, yet people born in 94-96 somehow... are 90s kids? Me, born 1995, I don't really think of myself as a 90s kid at all. Yet these folks seem to be implying that I am.

http://i.imgur.com/bd1MLQF.png

http://i.imgur.com/Lvqfeda.png

Seems like it's one of the things that will forever confuse/annoy me about mainstream Internet, along with their circlejerks over Bernie Sanders, Ron Paul, bacon, weed, atheism, bashing "le cheeto drumpf" at every turn, The Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, Bill Nye, Harambe, fidget spinners, and claiming to "f*king love science" despite only having a base philistine knowledge of science.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/07/17 at 7:36 pm

What's ironic about it? ???. You was born in 1996...and yet you think you're different from me, that's weird. Most of my friends do not obsess over Steven Universe. Also, people my age aren't kids for your information.

Side note: What's up with some of you 1995-1996 borns thinking that y'all are 10 years older than us 1999 borns? >:(
That's mostly incorrect.

Anyways, here is video based on this topic:
mRnYPpymzrE
It's ironic because you're younger than me defending the Looney Tunes, when an older person would typically defend a super old franchise, and try to convince the younger person that it's still 'cool'. ;D

Also, anyone under 18 is technically a kid. I like to think that I'm different from '99 borns 'cause I can actually remember 1999 and the entirety of the Early 00's. 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/07/17 at 8:02 pm

Yeah, it does seem to be kind of peculiar, this trend of people born in the mid 90s making fun of people born in the late 90s for being "spoiled kids these days" or acting like they're 20 years older than them, despite not being THAT much older than them.

Like, there's this trend on Leddit and other normie sites, where people born in 97-99 are singled out for not being 90s kids, yet people born in 94-96 somehow... are 90s kids? Me, born 1995, I don't really think of myself as a 90s kid at all. Yet these folks seem to be implying that I am.

http://i.imgur.com/bd1MLQF.png

http://i.imgur.com/Lvqfeda.png

Seems like it's one of the things that will forever confuse/annoy me about mainstream Internet, along with their circlejerks over Bernie Sanders, Ron Paul, bacon, weed, atheism, bashing "le cheeto drumpf" at every turn, The Avengers, Guardians of the Galaxy, Bill Nye, Harambe, fidget spinners, and claiming to "f*king love science" despite only having a base philistine knowledge of science.

Yeah, I agree with pretty much everything you said.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/07/17 at 8:07 pm

It's ironic because you're younger than me defending the Looney Tunes, when an older person would typically defend a super old franchise, and try to convince the younger person that it's still 'cool'. ;D

Also, anyone under 18 is technically a kid. I like to think that I'm different from '99 borns 'cause I can actually remember 1999 and the entirety of the Early 00's. 8)

The Looney Tunes is not your average super old cartoons. There were 2 new Looney Tunes cartoons in the 2000s (Baby Looney Tunes and Loonatics Unleashed), a Looney Tunes live action/animated hybrid film (Looney Tunes: Back in Action), and reruns of the original were still being aired.....so of course a person like me born in 1999 would defend it 8).

Us 1999 borns are turning 18...also you're just 21 years and technically you don't be come a full adult until 25 ::). Anyways, remembering 1999 as a 3 year old still doesn't mean you're that different from me.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/07/17 at 8:49 pm

"The Looney Tunes is not your average super old cartoons. There were 2 new Looney Tunes cartoons in the 2000s (Baby Looney Tunes and Loonatics Unleashed), a Looney Tunes live action/animated hybrid film (Looney Tunes: Back in Action), and reruns of the original were still being aired.....so of course a person like me born in 1999 would defend it 8)."

All those shows you listed were eventually cancelled, including the recent one from the 2010's, and LBIA didn't do as well as Space Jam.

"Us 1999 borns are turning 18...also you're just 21 years and technically you don't be come a full adult until 25 ::). Anyways, remembering 1999 as a 3 year old still doesn't mean you're that different from me."

Being born in a time where I can remember 1999 and the entirety of the Early 00's is pretty darn special. If it wasn't, then so many Late 90's borns wouldn't care about how much of the 90's and the Early 00's they can remember. They would gladly trade places with a '96-er than not remember at least a sliver of the 90's and 9/11 at all.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/07/17 at 9:08 pm

It's ironic because you're younger than me defending the Looney Tunes, when an older person would typically defend a super old franchise, and try to convince the younger person that it's still 'cool'. ;D

I don't eventually think the Looney Tunes is cool now. It was cool seeing it in the 1930s-1980s, but really got out of hand by the mid 90s. It's surprising that you find it to be cool because you were born in 1996, yet you were only a baby when Space Jam was released. That's like me saying to early 2000s babies that Korn (a nu-metal band) isn't cool to listen to, unless you were born before 2000. It's entirely stupid.

Also, anyone under 18 is technically a kid. I like to think that I'm different from '99 borns 'cause I can actually remember 1999 and the entirety of the Early 00's. 8)

This has to be a joke. How are you proud of remembering 1999, when you were only 3 years old at the time? What stuff did you do back then which made you different than 1999 babies?

All those shows you listed were eventually cancelled, including the recent one from the 2010's, and LBIA didn't do as well as Space Jam.

That doesn't mean Space Jam is as cool as LBIA. Ever heard of cult classics? LBIA is one of them.

Being born in a time where I can remember 1999 and the entirety of the Early 00's is pretty darn special. If it wasn't, then so many Late 90's borns wouldn't care about how much of the 90's and the Early 00's they can remember. They would gladly trade places with a '96-er than not remember at least a sliver of the 90's and 9/11 at all.

You were only in Kindergarten during 9/11. It's not like you could easily understand what exactly happened during the attacks, especially since you were still transitioning from preschool or whatever. Also it doesn't really make you special into remembering the early 2000s, since theoretically that's when America (at least after 9/11) started to be more obsessed with terrorism.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/07/17 at 11:49 pm

All those shows you listed were eventually cancelled, including the recent one from the 2010's, and LBIA didn't do as well as Space Jam.
Who cares about if they were cancelled? Also, I never mentioned The Looney Tunes Show ("the recent one from the 2010's"...so don't talk about it). Once again, who cares about if Back in Action wasn't as successful as Space Jam? The point is that a 1999 born can care about The Looney Tunes for those 4 reasons I mentioned. What's your problem seriously? ???

Being born in a time where I can remember 1999 and the entirety of the Early 00's is pretty darn special. If it wasn't, then so many Late 90's borns wouldn't care about how much of the 90's and the Early 00's they can remember. They would gladly trade places with a '96-er than not remember at least a sliver of the 90's and 9/11 at all.

Oh god, here we go. Let me guess...being born in '96 makes you a '90s kid and all people born after 1998 are dumb, stupid '00s kids who never got to have a good childhood ::).

Stop being an ageist. You also sound ridiculous with your " would gladly trade places with a '96-er than not remember at least a sliver of the 90's and 9/11 at all" claim. It's just sad when a person born just 3 years older than you acts as if they are 15 years older than you and had a completely different childhood 8-P.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/08/17 at 5:33 am

I'm staying out of this "the huge difference between 20/21 and 18 year olds" discussion but I just want to say I love Space Jam and I think it unfairly gets a bad rap. I don't know what people expect from it, what's the gold standard of the genre here?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 6:43 am

I'm staying out of this "the huge difference between 20/21 and 18 year olds" discussion but I just want to say I love Space Jam and I think it unfairly gets a bad rap. I don't know what people expect from it, what's the gold standard of the genre here?

Space Jam gets a bad rap? Where? Space Jam gets a good to great rap from the majority of kids who watched it growing up. Its considered to be a masterpiece by many of them. Space Jam definitely doesn't get a bad rap. However, the thing that I and a few others were pointing out is that the film was just a massive cash grab and was average at best....but also fun and nostalgia filled.

Also, the gold standard for live action/animated hybrid films is 1988's Who Framed Roger Rabbit.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/08/17 at 7:03 am

What's ironic about it? ???. You was born in 1996...and yet you think you're different from me, that's weird. Most of my friends do not obsess over Steven Universe. Also, people my age aren't kids for your information.

Side note: What's up with some of you 1995-1996 borns thinking that y'all are 10 years older than us 1999 borns? >:(
That's mostly incorrect.

Anyways, here is video based on this topic:
mRnYPpymzrE

I'm not surprised that these kids don't know who those characters are.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/08/17 at 10:27 am

I don't eventually think the Looney Tunes is cool now. It was cool seeing it in the 1930s-1980s, but really got out of hand by the mid 90s. It's surprising that you find it to be cool because you were born in 1996, yet you were only a baby when Space Jam was released. http://That's like me saying to early 2000s babies that Korn (a nu-metal band) isn't cool to listen to, unless you were born before 2000. It's entirely stupid.

This has to be a joke. How are you proud of remembering 1999, when you were only 3 years old at the time? What stuff did you do back then which made you different than 1999 babies?

That doesn't mean Space Jam is as cool as LBIA. Ever heard of cult classics? LBIA is one of them.

You were only in Kindergarten during 9/11. It's not like you could easily understand what exactly happened during the attacks, especially since you were still transitioning from preschool or whatever. Also it doesn't really make you special into remembering the early 2000s, since theoretically that's when America (at least after 9/11) started to be more obsessed with terrorism.

Well, I sure hope you think so because KoRn isn't cool no matter what age you are.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/08/17 at 10:39 am

Well, I sure hope you think so because KoRn isn't cool no matter what age you are.

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/000/551/854/06f.jpg

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: #Infinity on 06/08/17 at 10:47 am

I don't care if there's a sequel or not, nothing entertains me anymore.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mqg96 on 06/08/17 at 1:49 pm

What made Space Jam and Back In Action fun for me were both movies having Looney Tunes characters in it. No matter how good or bad the cartoon or movie was, as a little kid ANYTHING Looney Tunes related caught my immediate attention. No surprise with my avatars. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 06/08/17 at 2:25 pm

Honestly didn't really like Back in Action that much. Always was more of a Space Jam kid 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 2:47 pm

"I don't eventually think the Looney Tunes is cool now. It was cool seeing it in the 1930s-1980s, but really got out of hand by the mid 90s. It's surprising that you find it to be cool because you were born in 1996, yet you were only a baby when Space Jam was released. That's like me saying to early 2000s babies that Korn (a nu-metal band) isn't cool to listen to, unless you were born before 2000. It's entirely stupid."

You're the one being stupid. I never said that I thought the Looney Tunes is cool. Again, I just found it ironic that someone who's younger than me is interested in a super old franchise and trying to convince an older person why it's still cool, when most '99-ers would rather watch Steven Universe. Jeez Louise, you kids don't understand irony. I could care less about the Looney Tunes. I haven't even watched a marathon of the classic show in years.

"This has to be a joke. How are you proud of remembering 1999, when you were only 3 years old at the time? What stuff did you do back then which made you different than 1999 babies?"

Look, you don't know me. I have an extremely sharp memory and that's what makes me different. In fact, even ReignMan99 himself was impressed with my sharp memory and intellect. I'll have to link you the post where I talked about all the things I can remember from 1999 to 2003 -- The music, the TV shows, the sights, the fashion, and the day of 9/11.

"That doesn't mean Space Jam is as cool as LBIA. Ever heard of cult classics? LBIA is one of them."

That is your opinion, not a fact. Space Jam still did better than LBIA, plus the movie Space Jam had the Space Jam song.

"You were only in Kindergarten during 9/11. It's not like you could easily understand what exactly happened during the attacks, especially since you were still transitioning from preschool or whatever. Also it doesn't really make you special into remembering the early 2000s, since theoretically that's when America (at least after 9/11) started to be more obsessed with terrorism."

So what? I have an astoundingly sharp memory. I'll have to link you the post so you can see what I'm talking about. Again, it IS special because many kids from the Late 90's and younger WISH they could at least remember even a sliver of the 90's, the entirety of the Early 00's, and the day of 9/11. The Early 00's was a good time and there was more to it than terrorism, obviously. Even older people can attest to this. You like things from the Early 00's yourself, which means that you also agree that the Early 00's was a good time.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/08/17 at 3:05 pm

Maybe because the sequel was terrible, and people want to see another major NBA player star in a film with LT characters. As BIA, I don't remember watching that at all most likely because I was out of the range regarding children shows/movies despite that I continued watching over over the years.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 3:07 pm

"Who cares about if they were cancelled? Also, I never mentioned The Looney Tunes Show ("the recent one from the 2010's"...so don't talk about it)."

There you go defending the Looney Tunes again. The fact that those shows were cancelled only proves that it's a dying franchise. They are struggling to stay relevant with today's youth, and that's why I brought up "The Looney Tunes show", which was targeted towards today's youth (Millenials and Gen Z) and didn't last very long.

"Once again, who cares about if Back in Action wasn't as successful as Space Jam? The point is that a 1999 born can care about The Looney Tunes for those 4 reasons I mentioned. What's your problem seriously? ???"

Bro, WHY are you defending the Looney Tunes and LBIA so hard? I'm just speaking facts, and you're disregarding them.

"Oh god, here we go. Let me guess...being born in '96 makes you a '90s kid and all people born after 1998 are dumb, stupid '00s kids who never got to have a good childhood ::)."

I take pride in having more experience with the golden years than those who are younger than me can. After all, most of us are on this website to reminisce over their favorite decade(s). You should take pride in the year you were born in too, unless you favor the present over the past.

"Stop being an ageist. You also sound ridiculous with your " would gladly trade places with a '96-er than not remember at least a sliver of the 90's and 9/11 at all" claim. It's just sad when a person born just 3 years older than you acts as if they are 15 years older than you and had a completely different childhood 8-P."

Many people your age and younger are 90's kid wannabes. They wish they could've seen and experienced the 90's for themselves. Don't YOU? I mean, the vast majority of users on this website are nostalgic people. Unless you're a futurist and you don't care about how cool the 90's and Early 00's was? Stop pretending like you don't wish you were older.

Technically, I did have a different childhood than you because of all the things I can remember that you can't. Have you forgotten that you were impressed by my sharp memory? http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=42764.2835

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/08/17 at 3:15 pm

Stop being an ageist. You also sound ridiculous with your " would gladly trade places with a '96-er than not remember at least a sliver of the 90's and 9/11 at all" claim. It's just sad when a person born just 3 years older than you acts as if they are 15 years older than you and had a completely different childhood 8-P.
The 80s and early 90s folks are the worst when it comes to ageism. Look how many of them even state that they are much closer to 70s folks than mid-90s+. They all act they are 10-15 years older than they really are. I personally don't see any of my friends or family do it, but the commenters on Youtube do this all the time! It's a good thing I'm not one of them because that's not a good habit to have.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 4:35 pm

The 80s and early 90s folks are the worst when it comes to ageism. Look how many of them even state that they are much closer to 70s folks than mid-90s+. They all act they are 10-15 years older than they really are. I personally don't see any of my friends or family do it, but the commenters on Youtube do this all the time! It's a good thing I'm not one of them because that's not a good habit to have.

I absolutely agree.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 4:39 pm

I like how FunkSoulBrother96 acts as if he was born in 1976 instead of 1996. You're not special because you can remember 1999 as a 3 year old. Why don't you use your knowledge of fashion and trends and stop being an ageist?

I have some friends and cousins born in 1996 and I know a few other 1996 borns on this site and the differences in our childhoods is very, very minimal. FunkSoulBrother96....please stop ✋ or else I will end my conservation with you.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Looney Toon on 06/08/17 at 5:25 pm

The 80s and early 90s folks are the worst when it comes to ageism. Look how many of them even state that they are much closer to 70s folks than mid-90s+. They all act they are 10-15 years older than they really are. I personally don't see any of my friends or family do it, but the commenters on Youtube do this all the time! It's a good thing I'm not one of them because that's not a good habit to have.

A 1991er saying he/she is closer to someone from the 1970s?
uuL6cJPz3Nk
::) Idiots need to get over themselves. I'm much closer to any 1990s born than a 1970s born. I like ageism just due to how easy it is to counter and make fun of. About 90% of ageist comments someone may have can easily be proven wrong since most ageist comments are based on bias and not logic.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 5:29 pm

::) Idiots need to get over themselves. I'm much closer to any 1990s born than a 1970s born. I like ageism just due to how easy it is to counter and make fun of. About 90% of ageist comments someone may have can easily be proven wrong since most ageist comments are based on bias and not logic.

I agree with you wholeheartedly...100%.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mqg96 on 06/08/17 at 5:48 pm

"I don't eventually think the Looney Tunes is cool now. It was cool seeing it in the 1930s-1980s, but really got out of hand by the mid 90s. It's surprising that you find it to be cool because you were born in 1996, yet you were only a baby when Space Jam was released. That's like me saying to early 2000s babies that Korn (a nu-metal band) isn't cool to listen to, unless you were born before 2000. It's entirely stupid."

"This has to be a joke. How are you proud of remembering 1999, when you were only 3 years old at the time? What stuff did you do back then which made you different than 1999 babies?"

"That doesn't mean Space Jam is as cool as LBIA. Ever heard of cult classics? LBIA is one of them."

"You were only in Kindergarten during 9/11. It's not like you could easily understand what exactly happened during the attacks, especially since you were still transitioning from preschool or whatever. Also it doesn't really make you special into remembering the early 2000s, since theoretically that's when America (at least after 9/11) started to be more obsessed with terrorism."

Who the f**king hell spewed out this nonsense BS? Whoever said this.... Looney Tunes has been passed down for generations, and it was VERY cool to see Looney Tunes in the 90's & early 00's when it was on Saturday Morning blocks, Nickelodeon, or Cartoon Network. Looney Tunes merchandise was still very popular throughout the 90's to early 00's as well, so I don't know what the hell you're talking about (not you FunkSoulBrother)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 6:14 pm

I like how FunkSoulBrother96 acts as if he was born in 1976 instead of 1996. You're not special because you can remember 1999 as a 3 year old. Why don't you use your knowledge of fashion and trends and stop being an ageist?

I have some friends and cousins born in 1996 and I know a few other 1996 borns on this site and the differences in our childhoods is very, very minimal. FunkSoulBrother96....please stop ✋ or else I will end my conservation with you.
You're being ageist too because you think that my memory of 1999 is irrelevant just because I was 3. I may have been born in 1996, but my sharp memory makes me different from the rest. How many times do I have to tell you this? You recently told me I know too much for someone just a few years older: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=42764.2835

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 6:28 pm

You're being ageist too because you think that my memory of 1999 is irrelevant just because I was 3. I may have been born in 1996, but my sharp memory makes me different from the rest. How many times do I have to tell you this? You recently told me I know too much for someone just a few years older: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=42764.2835

No, I'm not being ageist because you feel like you're special because you can remember 1999 as a 3 year old. I'm telling you that you're not...because that's a fact. Also, you admit to being an ageist (which is sad).

Like I said: "Why don't you use your knowledge of fashion and trends and stop being an ageist?"

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 06/08/17 at 7:06 pm

I like how FunkSoulBrother96 acts as if he was born in 1976 instead of 1996. You're not special because you can remember 1999 as a 3 year old. Why don't you use your knowledge of fashion and trends and stop being an ageist?

I have some friends and cousins born in 1996 and I know a few other 1996 borns on this site and the differences in our childhoods is very, very minimal. FunkSoulBrother96....please stop ✋ or else I will end my conservation with you.

Don't worry this guy doesn't represent most 1996 babies.

Who the f**king hell spewed out this nonsense BS? Whoever said this.... Looney Tunes has been passed down for generations, and it was VERY cool to see Looney Tunes in the 90's & early 00's when it was on Saturday Morning blocks, Nickelodeon, or Cartoon Network. Looney Tunes merchandise was still very popular throughout the 90's to early 00's as well, so I don't know what the hell you're talking about (not you FunkSoulBrother)

Yeah I find it weird how someone would come to that conclusion. They may not be as popular now, but they were still pretty prominent in the 1990's and 2000's with reruns still being shown regularly on Cartoon Network and (to a lesser extent) Nickelodeon. Heck you had countless Looney Tunes spinoffs during those years like Tiny Toon Adventures (1990-1995), Animaniacs (1993-1998), Sylvester & Tweety Mysteries (1995-2001), and Baby Looney Tunes (2001-2006).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 7:14 pm

No, I'm not being ageist because you feel like you're special because you can remember 1999 as a 3 year old. I'm telling you that you're not...because that's a fact. Also, you admit to being an ageist (which is sad).

Like I said: "Why don't you use your knowledge of fashion and trends and stop being an ageist?"
I can remember more of the past, which means I'm better than younger people (like you) who remember less.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 7:16 pm

Don't worry this guy doesn't represent most 1996 babies.
I never said that I represent most 1996 babies. I'm different, and better than the rest of them because of my memory.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 7:16 pm

Don't worry this guy doesn't represent most 1996 babies.
Oh don't worry I know. He's just ridiculous.

Yeah I find it weird how someone would come to that conclusion. They may not be as popular now, but they were still pretty prominent in the 1990's and 2000's with reruns still being shown regularly on Cartoon Network and (to a lesser extent) Nickelodeon. Heck you had countless Looney Tunes spinoffs during those years like Tiny Toon Adventures (1990-1995), Animaniacs (1993-1998), Sylvester & Tweety Mysteries (1995-2001), and Baby Looney Tunes (2001-2006).

Exactly!.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 7:19 pm

I can remember more of the past, which means I'm better than younger people (like you) who remember less.

I never said that I represent most 1996 babies. I'm different, and better than the rest of them because of my memory.

You're actually quiet pathetic if you think that. Your ageism is disgusting and I just can't continue to converse with someone who thinks that they are superior to me just because they are older than me (especially just a measly 3 years). Bleh, no more will I be conversing with you 8-P.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 7:20 pm

Oh don't worry I know. He's just ridiculous.
Exactly!.
Ridiculous, huh? My, how the tables have turned... You went from compliments to insults...

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 7:23 pm

"Disgusting", huh? I'll bet deep down you wish you were older. You're probably just jealous. I am superior to you, for I am your elder. You must respect your elders. Early '96 borns have more wisdom and experience than you. ;) 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 7:25 pm

Anyways, Space Jam 2 will come out when Half Life 3 comes out.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 7:26 pm

Anyways, Space Jam 2 will come out when Half Life 3 comes out.
lel

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/08/17 at 7:38 pm

Anyone see that movie with Shaq in it? He can't act! :P

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/08/17 at 7:49 pm

I never said that I represent most 1996 babies. I'm different, and better than the rest of them because of my memory.

You were still in the crib playing with the mobile and learning to count up to 10. C'mon! ;D

3 years difference is nothing. Remembering 1999 isn't even that special, it wasn't that different from the early 2000s.

Anyways, Space Jam 2 will come out when Half Life 3 comes out.

Wasn't Space Jam 2 already announced?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/08/17 at 8:10 pm

I never said that I represent most 1996 babies. I'm different, and better than the rest of them because of my memory.

So? Mqg96 was born in early 1996 (February to be exact) and he doesn't spew that bullcrap on the Internet, even outside of InThe00s. The fact that you think you're better than 1996-1999 babies is really pathetic, since you were only a toddler during the late 90s. There are actual 90s kids born between 1986-1991 who could remember the late 90s/early 2000s better than you. Not to mention that you were 8-10 during the mid 2000s. So not only are you a mid 2000s kid, but you can also share experiences with 1997-1999 babies.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 8:13 pm

Anyone see that movie with Shaq in it? He can't act! :P

Unfortunately :-X

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/380502545272-0-1/s-l1000.jpg
Released July 17, 1996

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 8:16 pm

Wasn't Space Jam 2 already announced?

Supposedly but nothing really definitive yet. Also, who is going to star? LeBron? Steph Curry? Kevin Durant? Blake Griffin? :-\\

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/08/17 at 8:18 pm

Unfortunately :-X

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/380502545272-0-1/s-l1000.jpg
Released July 17, 1996

It's a good thing it was a box office bomb though. That movie became really outdated after 1996.

Supposedly but nothing really definitive yet. Also, who is going to star? LeBron? Steph Curry? Kevin Durant? Blake Griffin? :-\\

I bet it would star Lebron, since he's basically the 2010s Michael Jordan.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 8:23 pm

It's a good thing it was a box office bomb though. That movie became really outdated after 1996.
I agree.

I bet it would star Lebron, since he's basically the 2010s Michael Jordan.

I guess but a lot of people don't want that to happen ;D (then again a lot of people don't want a Space Jam 2 to happen anyways...which I sort of agree with).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/08/17 at 8:30 pm

I guess but a lot of people don't want that to happen ;D (then again a lot of people don't want a Space Jam 2 to happen anyways...which I sort of agree with).

I don't think Space Jam 2 would ever get successfully produced. It's probably going to get cancelled within weeks.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/08/17 at 8:31 pm

Unfortunately :-X

http://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/380502545272-0-1/s-l1000.jpg
Released July 17, 1996

They were going for the whole Aladdin look! :(

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 8:34 pm

They were going for the whole Aladdin look! :(

Yep....:-X

https://media.baselineresearch.com/images/261070/261070_full.jpg

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 8:50 pm

You were still in the crib playing with the mobile and learning to count up to 10. C'mon! ;D

3 years difference is nothing. Remembering 1999 isn't even that special, it wasn't that different from the early 2000s.

Wasn't Space Jam 2 already announced?
Actually, no I wasn't in a crib back then. It doesn't matter that I was 3. Big whoop. What matters is that I have more memory, wisdom and experience. 8-P

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 8:54 pm

So? Mqg96 was born in early 1996 (February to be exact) and he doesn't spew that bullcrap on the Internet, even outside of InThe00s. The fact that you think you're better than 1996-1999 babies is really pathetic, since you were only a toddler during the late 90s. There are actual 90s kids born between 1986-1991 who could remember the late 90s/early 2000s better than you. Not to mention that you were 8-10 during the mid 2000s. So not are you a mid 2000s kid, but you can also share experiences with 1997-1999 babies.
Like I said, you don't know me and I do actually remember 1999 & The Early 00's. Either click on the link I provided or take my word for it. Being older and having more wisdom technically makes me better than those who are younger than me. See, ageism is when people like you disregard one's memory because they were 'too young.' My memories are not invalid: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=42764.2835

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Zelek3 on 06/08/17 at 8:56 pm

Guys, calm down, let's not tear each other apart over something so petty.

Let's get back to the subject of the topic, which is Space Jam and its sequel(s).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/08/17 at 8:59 pm

Guys, calm down, let's not tear each other apart over something so petty.

Let's get back to the subject of the topic, which is Space Jam and its sequel(s).

I tried to do that :(.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/08/17 at 9:00 pm

I tried to do that :(.
Remember to respect your elders, young one. ;) 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/08/17 at 10:18 pm

Ageism is when people like you disregard one's memory because they were 'too young.'
I've seen a lot of ageism not from folks in your age range, but those who are in the span of the late 80s and the first half of the 90s.

A 1991er saying he/she is closer to someone from the 1970s?
uuL6cJPz3Nk
::) Idiots need to get over themselves. I'm much closer to any 1990s born than a 1970s born. I like ageism just due to how easy it is to counter and make fun of. About 90% of ageist comments someone may have can easily be proven wrong since most ageist comments are based on bias and not logic.
Well not exactly for the top one, but I have seen them make statements that they are much closer to 1985-87 folks than 1995-97 people. OTT, I agree. Ageism is nothing more than being an elitist.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/09/17 at 6:55 am

Remember to respect your elders, young one. ;) 8)

You are three years older than us. You could be old enough to be some 1999 baby's big brother, but that doesn't mean you're THAT old compared to late 90s babies.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 06/09/17 at 7:22 am

Remember to respect your elders, young one. ;) 8)

We're not that much younger than you. I have a maths tutor who was (presumably) born in 1996 and I would consider him to be apart of my age group.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/09/17 at 8:23 am

There's some serious trolling going on in this thread.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 10:03 am

If I ever have a conversation with 1997 or 1998 born person and they say that they didn't have a very, very similar childhood to me (virtually the same) and they act superior to 1999 borns.....I will give up hope on life and RAGE QUIT! >:(

Is being born in 1999 some sort of curse that everyone except 2000 borns don't want to be associated with us?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: HazelBlue99 on 06/09/17 at 10:17 am

If I ever have a conversation with 1997 or 1998 born person and they say that they didn't have a very, very similar childhood to me (virtually the same) and they act superior to 1999 borns.....I will give up hope on life and RAGE QUIT! >:(

Is being born in 1999 some sort of curse that everyone except 2000 borns don't want to be associated with us?

We've always received the short end of the stick, for some reason. I can remember reading lots of comments back around 2011 and 2012 of people criticising 1999 babies as being "little brats" and addicted to smartphones and social media. I think it's just the fact we were born at the end of the 90s, which of course, is a decade that many people are nostalgic for.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/09/17 at 10:25 am

Well, I can remember 1989 like it was yesterday so I'm more awesomer than all you guys put together.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 10:29 am

We've always received the short end of the stick, for some reason. I can remember reading lots of comments back around 2011 and 2012 of people criticising 1999 babies as being "little brats" and addicted to smartphones and social media. I think it's just the fact we were born at the end of the 90s, which of course, is a decade that many people are nostalgic for.

Yeah, I know. Out of all the people born in the 1990s, us 1999 borns are treated as the odd child..just because we're the youngest.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 10:31 am

Well, I can remember 1989 like it was yesterday so I'm more awesomer than all you guys put together.

ALL HAIL MY OVERLORD mach!ne_he@d! 8)

Anyways, I can remember all the way back until 2001....that means I'm more awesome and superior to people born 2001 - present....right? :(

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/09/17 at 10:44 am

ALL HAIL MY OVERLORD mach!ne_he@d! 8)

Anyways, I can remember all the way back until 2001....that means I'm more awesome and superior to people born 2001 - present....right? :(

Of course. How awesome you are is entirely based on when you were born. Because you can remember 2001 you're way more awesome than a 2001 born kid, just like a 2001er is way more awesome than a 2004er because they can remember that year. Now, I'm pretty freaking awesome because I was born in the '80s, but even I can't hold a candle to people born in the '70s. Those born during the '60s and earlier are like Gods.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/09/17 at 11:03 am

I remember 1985 clearly enough. I dare all of you to beat that! 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/09/17 at 11:10 am

I remember 1985 clearly enough. I dare all of you to beat that! 8)

Wasn't there a guy on here bragging about remembering 1999? Funny how he vanished when the '80s babies showed up.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/09/17 at 11:15 am

Wasn't there a guy on here bragging about remembering 1999? Funny how he vanished when the '80s babies showed up.

LOL I know right? Our superiority has been noted. ::)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 11:18 am

Wasn't there a guy on here bragging about remembering 1999? Funny how he vanished when the '80s babies showed up.

That would be FunkSoulBrother96.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/09/17 at 11:21 am

There's some serious trolling going on in this thread.
I don't think that user is trolling. I think he is being serious.

LOL I know right? Our superiority has been noted. ::)

Wasn't there a guy on here bragging about remembering 1999? Funny how he vanished when the '80s babies showed up.
Yeah, there was. He'll be back though.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/09/17 at 11:27 am

I don't think that user is trolling. I think he is being serious.

He was so cheeky; most likely just being a troll.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/09/17 at 11:34 am

He was so cheeky; most likely just being a troll.
If he was being cheeky, then why didn't he use many emoticons?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/09/17 at 11:35 am

If he was being cheeky, then why didn't he use many emoticons?

You don't have to use emoticons to be cheeky, dude.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/09/17 at 11:41 am

You don't have to use emoticons to be cheeky, dude.
It doesn't sound like he was being sarcastic though. He seemed proud of it.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/09/17 at 12:34 pm

If I ever have a conversation with 1997 or 1998 born person and they say that they didn't have a very, very similar childhood to me (virtually the same) and they act superior to 1999 borns.....I will give up hope on life and RAGE QUIT! >:(

Is being born in 1999 some sort of curse that everyone except 2000 borns don't want to be associated with us?

Nah. I know some 1998 babies that were eventually my friends. I think it's just that FunkSoulBrother is an ageist douchebag who thinks that being old is cooler. Even though he basically went to elementary school with 1999 babies at the same time (when he was in 3rd-5th grade).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/09/17 at 12:52 pm

You don't have to use emoticons to be cheeky, dude.

You would know eh.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 12:55 pm

Nah. I know some 1998 babies that were eventually my friends. I think it's just that FunkSoulBrother is an ageist douchebag who thinks that being old is cooler. Even though he basically went to elementary school with 1999 babies at the same time (when he was in 3rd-5th grade).
You're the real douchebag for disregarding my memories just because I was 'too young' by your standards. So all those other users like Machine Head AREN'T elitist, ageist, douchebags too? They think they're better than 90's babies. Also, I was born in April 1996. So no, I didn't go to elementary school with 1999 babies. It wasn't until my Senior year of High School when I finally went to school with kids from late '98 and early '99.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/09/17 at 1:04 pm

You're the real douchebag for disregarding my memories just because I was 'too young' by your standards. So all those other users like Machine Head AREN'T elitist, ageist, douchebags too? They think they're better than 90's babies. Also, I was born in April 1996. So no, I didn't go to elementary school with 1999 babies. It wasn't until my Senior year of High School when I finally went to school with kids from late '98 and early '99.

Dude, like, chill. 21 year olds and 18 year olds are the same age group. It's not a big difference.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 1:10 pm

Let's get this back to Space Jam 2.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/09/17 at 2:56 pm

You would know eh.

Wanna fight? >:(

You're the real douchebag for disregarding my memories just because I was 'too young' by your standards. So all those other users like Machine Head AREN'T elitist, ageist, douchebags too? They think they're better than 90's babies. Also, I was born in April 1996. So no, I didn't go to elementary school with 1999 babies. It wasn't until my Senior year of High School when I finally went to school with kids from late '98 and early '99.

Laying down the facts don't make you an elitist. Machine Head has the correct opinion in this situation.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 3:00 pm

Dude, like, chill. 21 year olds and 18 year olds are the same age group. It's not a big difference.
I'm a Mid 90's baby. We are not in the same group due to differences in memory, experience and wisdom.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 3:01 pm

Wanna fight? >:(

Laying down the facts don't make you an elitist. Machine Head has the correct opinion in this situation.
Oh and I don't?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/09/17 at 4:25 pm

Anyone see that movie with Shaq in it? He can't act! :P

He can't even act in commercials. ::)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/09/17 at 4:27 pm

I remember 1985 clearly enough. I dare all of you to beat that! 8)

I was 11 years old in 1985.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/09/17 at 4:31 pm

I was 11 years old in 1985.

You win the thread. None of us can match that level of awesomeness.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: ZeldaFan20 on 06/09/17 at 5:29 pm

You're the real douchebag for disregarding my memories just because I was 'too young' by your standards. So all those other users like Machine Head AREN'T elitist, ageist, douchebags too? They think they're better than 90's babies. Also, I was born in April 1996. So no, I didn't go to elementary school with 1999 babies. It wasn't until my Senior year of High School when I finally went to school with kids from late '98 and early '99.

Bro chill the f*ck out. You're disrespecting the 95-96' legacy (me, Zelek, Eric, & Marquis)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: #Infinity on 06/09/17 at 6:43 pm

Not that any of it matters, at least none of you are me.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Looney Toon on 06/09/17 at 6:47 pm

This thread got strange. Anyways as for Space Jam 2 I'm not sure if it'll really happen. These live action/animated hybrid movies (Cool World, Roger Rabbit, Back in Action, Space Jam etc) never really get sequels which is a shame since the ideas of them are cool. But I guess we can just chalk all this up to just being the fad at the time thanks to Roger Rabbit's success. Although literally every movie after Roger Rabbit was disappointing overall due to design choices or just bad writing.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 6:52 pm

This thread got strange. Anyways as for Space Jam 2 I'm not sure if it'll really happen. These live action/animated hybrid movies (Cool World, Roger Rabbit, Back in Action, Space Jam etc) never really get sequels which is a shame since the ideas of them are cool. But I guess we can just chalk all this up to just being the fad at the time thanks to Roger Rabbit's success. Although literally every movie after Roger Rabbit was disappointing overall due to design choices or just bad writing.

Yeah, that is true.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/09/17 at 7:48 pm

You're the real douchebag for disregarding my memories just because I was 'too young' by your standards. So all those other users like Machine Head AREN'T elitist, ageist, douchebags too? They think they're better than 90's babies.

That's not what I said at all. I'm saying that you aren't superior compared to 1999 babies, considering they could also remember the early 2000s as well. Hell, even as a 1999 baby, I could remember 2002 and 2003. It's not as important as my other childhood memories, but it was still a big step into what I saw as a toddler. The only thing is that they were vague, so I couldn't really tell that much about them. Still, I don't know what you actually did during 1999. At least for what I did back in 2002 and 2003, I played happily outside and with my toys. I sometimes even went to the playground with my parents.

Also, I was born in April 1996. So no, I didn't go to elementary school with 1999 babies. It wasn't until my Senior year of High School when I finally went to school with kids from late '98 and early '99.

I'm sorry, but weren't you in 3rd grade when 1999 babies were in Kindergarten? Some of them probably saw you walking in the hallway in your elementary school.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 8:14 pm

That's not what I said at all. I'm saying that you aren't superior compared to 1999 babies, considering they could also remember the early 2000s as well. Hell, even as a 1999 baby, I could remember 2002 and 2003. It's not as important as my other childhood memories, but it was still a big step into what I saw as a toddler. The only thing is that they were vague, so I couldn't really tell that much about them. Still, I don't know what you actually did during 1999. At least for what I did back in 2002 and 2003, I played happily outside and with my toys. I sometimes even went to the playground with my parents.

I'm sorry, but weren't you in 3rd grade when 1999 babies were in Kindergarten? Some of them probably saw you walking in the hallway in your elementary school.

You tell him bro 8).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 9:09 pm

That's not what I said at all. I'm saying that you aren't superior compared to 1999 babies, considering they could also remember the early 2000s as well. Hell, even as a 1999 baby, I could remember 2002 and 2003. It's not as important as my other childhood memories, but it was still a big step into what I saw as a toddler. The only thing is that they were vague, so I couldn't really tell that much about them. Still, I don't know what you actually did during 1999. At least for what I did back in 2002 and 2003, I played happily outside and with my toys. I sometimes even went to the playground with my parents.

I'm sorry, but weren't you in 3rd grade when 1999 babies were in Kindergarten? Some of them probably saw you walking in the hallway in your elementary school.
I remember the way people dressed from 1999 - 2001. You can't. I remember all the shows I watched from 1999 - 2001, like Pokemon, Dragon Ball Z, etc.. You can't. I remember New Years of 2000. You can't. I can still remember the day of 9/11, being picked up from School and watching the towers burning on TV and my mom talking on the phone with her friend from DC. You can't remember this special event in American history. Therefore, my memory and experience is technically superior to yours. Mid 90's borns and Late 90's borns are NOT the same. Now buzz off, schoolboy.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 9:10 pm

You tell him bro 8).
I'm still older than you, bro. How da ya like THEM apples? 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/09/17 at 9:48 pm

1996? You should be able to remember 1999, but barely. 2000, definitely!

Your attitude is a bit twisted, though. :D :D :D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/09/17 at 10:01 pm

FunkSoulBrother96 is an ignorant, harebrained troll. IGNORE HIM (just my suggestion).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 10:33 pm

1996? You should be able to remember 1999, but barely. 2000, definitely!

Your attitude is a bit twisted, though. :D :D :D
I'm one of a kind. I remember 1999 like it was yesterday.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/09/17 at 10:35 pm

FunkSoulBrother96 is an ignorant, harebrained troll. IGNORE HIM (just my suggestion).
I'm not a troll. TheReignMan99 here, is an ignorant thick-headed KID who remembers less, and is inferior to me.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 6:29 am

Oh and I don't?

No. All kids born in the 90's are all the same, aren't real people and are inferior to those of us born in the 60's-80's like me, Machine Head and Howard.

I was 11 years old in 1985.

Howard is clearly the superior one here. Kids born in 1996 trying to play off some superior trip? Please. Who let the babies into the adults club? ::)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 10:12 am

No. All kids born in the 90's are all the same, aren't real people and are inferior to those of us born in the 60's-80's like me, Machine Head and Howard.

Howard is clearly the superior one here. Kids born in 1996 trying to play off some superior trip? Please. Who let the babies into the adults club? ::)

Thank you. Are people actually bragging about being able to remember 1999? Man, I can still remember 1989 like it was yesterday. Honestly, I can still remember sitting on the floor with my Teddy Ruxpin watching the Berlin Wall come down. Even at age 2 I knew this was going to be a momentous moment. Also, I can still remember New Year's Day 1990, and when Smells Like Teen Spirit came out. On the day I saw the SLTS video for the first time on MTV at age 4, I turned to my newborn brother and predicted that this would change pop culture for years to come.

No 1996er can even come close to that level of awesomeness.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 10:57 am

Thank you. Are people actually bragging about being able to remember 1999? Man, I can still remember 1989 like it was yesterday. Honestly, I can still remember sitting on the floor with my Teddy Ruxpin watching the Berlin Wall come down. Even at age 2 I knew this was going to be a momentous moment. Also, I can still remember New Year's Day 1990, and when Smells Like Teen Spirit came out. On the day I saw the SLTS video for the first time on MTV at age 4, I turned to my newborn brother and predicted that this would change pop culture for years to come.

No 1996er can even come close to that level of awesomeness.

You're absolutely correct ;D.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mqg96 on 06/10/17 at 11:09 am

I remember the way people dressed from 1999 - 2001. You can't. I remember all the shows I watched from 1999 - 2001, like Pokemon, Dragon Ball Z, etc..

You know 1999 born's could have remembered watching Pokemon and DBZ from 2003-2005 on Cartoon Network, if in your case you remember watching the shows from 1999-2001.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mqg96 on 06/10/17 at 11:15 am

Bro chill the f*ck out. You're disrespecting the 95-96' legacy (me, Zelek, Eric, & Marquis)

This guy has got to be a fake/joke account. This guy's avatar is a rehash of Zelek's avatar combined with Guy Fieri, just to make him seem like a more intimidating conservative. Could this secretly be a resurrected cool123 (remember him guys?) out for blood on everybody?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 11:36 am

Thank you. Are people actually bragging about being able to remember 1999? Man, I can still remember 1989 like it was yesterday. Honestly, I can still remember sitting on the floor with my Teddy Ruxpin watching the Berlin Wall come down. Even at age 2 I knew this was going to be a momentous moment. Also, I can still remember New Year's Day 1990, and when Smells Like Teen Spirit came out. On the day I saw the SLTS video for the first time on MTV at age 4, I turned to my newborn brother and predicted that this would change pop culture for years to come.

No 1996er can even come close to that level of awesomeness.

You're correct as usual. Our club (The Secret Society of Fellows Born Before 1990) is very elite and sacred. These young little 1996 babies think they have anything on those of us who saw Smells Like Teen Spirit on MTV or held Teddy Ruxpin dolls in our hands!? Ha! Hilarious.

This guy has got to be a fake/joke account. This guy's avatar is a rehash of Zelek's avatar combined with Guy Fieri, just to make him seem like a more intimidating conservative. Could this secretly be a resurrected cool123 (remember him guys?) out for blood on everybody?

Hard to say but there is also another user who I think is cool123 using an alt. Not sure if funk brother is him or another banned user.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Looney Toon on 06/10/17 at 11:55 am

Well this thread got ruined. Ageism and silly banter thrown back and forth. Who the hell cares on what you remember in comparison to others anyways? The whole charm of being human is that you'll have your own experiences in a different time in a different place. Remembering different time periods is something that was supposed to be one of the unique and fascinating things about humanity. But now everyone is just using it to make themselves seem superior to others.

"Durr Hurr I remember . You younger folk will NEVER be able to experience what I had."

Like seriously why does anyone give a damn? I tend to make posts on what I recall from my past experiences, but I never make any jabs or comments on how people younger than me missed out or try to make myself feel special because of what I had. What you remember doesn't make you special in itself. We all remember different things which is what makes us all special. People need to get over themselves.

For a while I got sick of older people bragging about the "cool" stuff that they had when they were younger and always say nonsense like "Life was simpler back then". News flash older time periods ALWAYS LOOK SIMPLER! 1980s life looks simpler compared to the 2000s. 2000s life looks simpler compared to the present day or the upcoming 2020s. The 2020s will look simple when compared to the 2050s. Life being simpler "Back in your day" is literally a "no sh*t, Captain Obvious" kind of thing as this is what is supposed to happen as time progresses. If life stay the same as it was in the 1980s or 1990s then humanity literally fails due to lack of progression and adapting. And I can't stand younger people who get brainwashed by these generation elitists and try to say things like "I'm 15 and I hate everything past 2000" whatever. They look stupid saying this as it means they basically hated their own childhood and the things they grew up with.

Nostalgia and this ageist elitism needs to die or get toned down.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 11:57 am

Well this thread got ruined. Ageism and silly banter thrown back and forth. Who the hell cares on what you remember in comparison to others anyways? The whole charm of being human is that you'll have your own experiences in a different time in a different place. Remember different time periods is something that was supposed to be one of the unique and fascinating things about humanity. But now everyone is just using it to make themselves seem superior to others.

"Durr Hurr I remember . You younger folk will NEVER be able to experience what I had."

Like seriously why does anyone give a damn? I tend to make posts on what I recall from my past experiences, but I never make any jabs or comments on how people younger than me missed out or try to make myself feel special because of what I had. What you remember doesn't make you special in itself. We all remember different things which is what makes us all special. People need to get over themselves.

You're absolutely on the money!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 12:14 pm

I remember the way people dressed from 1999 - 2001.

If that's the case, then what did they wear between 1999 to 2001?

I remember all the shows I watched from 1999 - 2001, like Pokemon, Dragon Ball Z, etc..

I bet most of the shows you watched were from PBS Kids and Nick Jr, which would be similar to what I watched back in 2002-mid 2004. That doesn't really make you "superior", if most of the shows you watched were the same shows that most 1999 babies watched.

I remember New Years of 2000.

So? What did you actually do during Y2K? It's not like being a three year old during a New Year's Eve is actually worth remembering. I bet you didn't even stay up at midnight.

I can still remember the day of 9/11, being picked up from School and watching the towers burning on TV and my mom talking on the phone with her friend from DC. You can't remember this special event in American history.

So? I was only a year and a half old when the event happened. It's not like infants can actually remember something tragic, let alone 9/11. At least from what my mom recalled, I was basically inside their house and playing with my toys while they watched the event.

Therefore, my memory and experience is technically superior to yours. Mid 90's borns and Late 90's borns are NOT the same. Now buzz off, schoolboy.

If this is how you say that 1996 babies are superior to late 90s babies, then that's incredibly pathetic for you. Just because you were 3-5 during 1999-2001, that doesn't mean you are entirely different than 1999 babies, nor superior to them. It's really dumb to think that in the first place, since they legitimately had the same childhood memories as you.

Not to mention that there are SOME 1999 babies who did remember 9/11. There's even one user here born in 1999 (SharksFan99) who did remember the attacks at the age of 2. So saying that 1999 babies are "inferior" according to your early childhood memories is ageist.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:02 pm

"If that's the case, then what did they wear between 1999 to 2001?"

A lot of the same stuff people wore throughout the Early - Mid 00's:

Men:

Hair: Spikey hair, frosted tips, Caesar cuts, bowl cuts, cornrows, fades, emo sidesweep...

Head items: Bandanas, du-rags, New Era fitted caps, Starter caps (Bulls Championship '98)...

Upper body: Blank shirts, 'tall tees', sport jerseys, polos, U.S. Polo As an. shirts, Starter jackets, black leather jackets, jean jackets...

Lower body: Camouflage cargos, beige or black cargos, capris, baggy jeans...

Shoes: White Nike Sweet Classics, black New Balance, strap sandals with white socks...

Accessories: Black waistpack, ear studs, one earring to the left...

Professional: Black blazer, light blue dress shirt, black necktie with geometric patterns, black Dockers dress pants, black K Swiss shoes...

-

Women:

Mostly blonde or natural, ponytail, headband, hoop earrings, jean jackets, blank baby tees, capris, low rise jeans, white Nike Sweet Classics, strap sandals, sleeveless mini with white stockings and sandals and a bag, waistpacks...

-

"I bet most of the shows you watched were from PBS Kids and Nick Jr, which would be similar to what I watched back in 2002-mid 2004. That doesn't really make you "superior", if most of the shows you watched were the same shows that most 1999 babies watched."

I only watched PBS Kids and Nick Jr before school. Then sometimes after school I'd watch DBZ and Yu Yu Hakusho on Toonami, then end the night with Pokemon or Tom and Jerry, or "Kids Say The Darndest Things".

"So? What did you actually do during Y2K? It's not like being a three year old during a New Year's Eve is actually worth remembering. I bet you didn't even stay up at midnight."

I watched the fireworks on TV while building Legos with my cousin. We did stay up past midnight that day.

"So? I was only a year and a half old when the event happened. It's not like infants can actually remember something tragic, let alone 9/11. At least from what my mom recalled, I was basically inside their house and playing with my toys while they watched the event."

I do remember the day of 9/11. I wasn't an infant. I was a 5 year old in Kindergarten. Read my post about remembering 9/11 here: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=42764.2835

You know what? Screw it. You're probably too dumb to click on the link since I already posted it more than once, so I'll just copy and paste the whole story:

9/11:

I remember my Kindergarten teacher was crying that day and I couldn't understand why. She didn't tell the students what was going on that day.

The loudspeaker played patriotic songs while we all goofed off. Then all the parents came to take their kids home.

When I got home my mom was talking on the house-phone with a friend from DC, and my mom was like "What kind of idiots would do this?"

When I looked at the TV to see what was happening, I imagined the man from the Red Baron pizza box and his twin brother did an airshow and accidentally crashed, but parachuted out to safety. lol

I didn't learn about 9/11 and how bad it was until 6th grade when my teacher brought in the VHS tape about the Naudet brothers.

My Dad actually applied for a job at 7 WTC around August 2001 just for kicks, but he didn't get it because other people had applied earlier than him. It was across the street from the Twin Towers. He said he wouldn't want to work in NYC anyway, or even visit, because it's too crowded there.

Only an officer from 7 WTC died saving lives at the Twins across the street.

Speaking of victims, I know a woman who knew the hero of Flight 93. She was supposed to be on that plane, but missed her flight.

-

"If this is how you say that 1996 babies are superior to late 90s babies, then that's incredibly pathetic for you. Just because you were 3-5 during 1999-2001, that doesn't mean you are entirely different than 1999 babies, nor superior to them. It's really dumb to think that in the first place, since they legitimately had the same childhood memories as you.

Not to mention that there are SOME 1999 babies who did remember 9/11. There's even one user here born in 1999 (SharksFan99) who did remember the attacks at the age of 2. So saying that 1999 babies are "inferior" according to your early childhood memories is ageist."

Ah, but YOU don't remember 9/11, and SharksFan99 doesn't remember that day as well as I can. I wasn't a infant, baby or toddler either. I was a 5 year old in Kindergarten. 5 year olds aren't stupid. Therefore, our memories vary.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 1:28 pm

That is wrong. Nobody had an "emo sidesweep" until 2003.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:36 pm

That is wrong. Nobody had an "emo sidesweep" until 2003.
You're kinda right, but it was around since 1999: http://worldofwonder.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/tumblr_mv1xkpXsl31qeassko1_1280.jpg

Although I do remember witnessing plenty of Asian dudes with the emo sidesweep after 2000.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 1:37 pm

FunkSoulBrother is a big FRAUD and PHONY!.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:41 pm

FunkSoulBrother is a big FRAUD and PHONY!.
How...? ??? What do you want, my real photos?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 1:48 pm

FunkSoulBrother96, the only reason I'm talking to you is because I'm a person who doesn't hold hard feelings. Just stop with the shenanigans...you're not superior to anyone and that's it. However, if you want to continue in your la la land then by all means go ahead.

Never in my life would I see someone think their so superior just because of the year of their birth (which none of us chose...just silly nonsense).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:50 pm

FunkSoulBrother96, the only reason I'm talking to you is because I'm a person who doesn't hold hard feelings. Just stop with the shenanigans...you're not superior to anyone and that's it. However, if you want to continue in your la la land then by all means go ahead.

Never in my life would I see someone think their so superior just because of the year of their birth (which none of us chose...just silly nonsense).
Well JordkanK and Machine Head think they're superior to 90's babies. Yet you don't seem to have a problem with their elitism...

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 1:52 pm

Well JordkanK and Machine Head think they're superior to 90's babies. Yet you don't seem to have a problem with their elitism...

JordanK1982 and mach!ne_he@d are joking. You're not joking...you're serious. That's the difference.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 1:52 pm

I'm a Mid 90's baby. We are not in the same group due to differences in memory, experience and wisdom.

You're 21 years old... What "wisdom" could you possibly have to share?

Mid '90s and late '90s are right next to each other. You're only a few months older than people born in the late '90s. It's not a big difference.

And you were only 2 years old for a good chunk of '99. Sorry if none of this is believable. You seem to be one of those internet people that make a big deal out of being a "90s kid" and being superior to 2000s kid, when all you really remember about 1999 is getting potty trained and hiding your pacifier under the sofa. None of this counts as remembering the '90s. Sorry but you're not fooling anyone, and all this petty defensive just reveals your insecurities. Grow up.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 1:54 pm

You're 21 years old... What "wisdom" could you possibly have to share?

Mid '90s and late '90s are right next to each other. You're only a few months older than people born in the late '90s. It's not a big difference.

And you were only 2 years old for a good chunk of '99. Sorry if none of this is believable. You seem to be one of those internet people that make a big deal out of being a "90s kid" and being superior to 2000s kid, when all you really remember about 1999 is getting potty trained and hiding your pacifier under the sofa. None of this counts as remembering the '90s. Sorry but you're not fooling anyone, and all this petty defensive just reveals your insecurities. Grow up.

THANK YOU!.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:54 pm

JordanK1982 and mach!ne_he@d are joking. You're not joking...you're serious. That's the difference.
They're not joking. They really think they're better than us. I don't blame 'em.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 1:56 pm

They're not joking. They really think they're better than us. I don't blame 'em.

Continue the trolling....life is going to be a pain if you don't grow up quick.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:58 pm

You're 21 years old... What "wisdom" could you possibly have to share?

Mid '90s and late '90s are right next to each other. You're only a few months older than people born in the late '90s. It's not a big difference.

And you were only 2 years old for a good chunk of '99. Sorry if none of this is believable. You seem to be one of those internet people that make a big deal out of being a "90s kid" and being superior to 2000s kid, when all you really remember about 1999 is getting potty trained and hiding your pacifier under the sofa. None of this counts as remembering the '90s. Sorry but you're not fooling anyone, and all this petty defensive just reveals your insecurities. Grow up.
I'm slightly older than you. April 1996. That means I have more knowledge than those who are younger than me. So what if I was 3? I remember more than just kid stuff. My memories from 1999 are NOT invalid. So buzz off.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 1:59 pm

Continue the trolling....life is going to be a pain if you don't grow up quick.
Please, you're not even a legal adult yet.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:01 pm

I'm slightly older than you. April 1996. That means I have more knowledge than those who are younger than me. So what if I was 3? I remember more than just kid stuff. My memories from 1999 are NOT invalid. So buzz off.

Slowpoke is 3 years older than you...he was born in February 1993...so you buzz off.

Please, you're not even a legal adult yet.

Please, you may be a legal adult but you don't have the brain of one...you're still a 3 year old kid stuck in 1999. GROW UP!.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:04 pm

Slowpoke is 3 years older than you...he was born in February 1993...so you buzz off.
Please, you may be a legal adult but you don't have the brain of one...you're still a 3 year old kid stuck in 1999. GROW UP!.
I'm already grown, idiot. All I'm saying is that my memories aren't invalid just because I was a little boy. DEAL WITH IT.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:08 pm

You're kinda right, but it was around since 1999: http://worldofwonder.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/tumblr_mv1xkpXsl31qeassko1_1280.jpg

Although I do remember witnessing plenty of Asian dudes with the emo sidesweep after 2000.

I was involved in that scene; I've been going to emo shows since 1996 and they had that haircut back then, too. It's not a sidesweep, that's just shaggy long messy hair.

2003-2009 Emo fringes were neater and generally straightened:
http://www.prettydesigns.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Cool-Layered-Emo-Hairstyles-for-Emo-Guys.jpg

The point of the 1994-2002 emo look was similar to grunge hair, make it as messy and greasy as possible to show you "don't care."

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:08 pm

I'm already grown, idiot. All I'm saying is that my memories aren't invalid just because I was a little boy. DEAL WITH IT.

The only idiot here is you. You're only grown in the sense of your age but not your mind...you're just a sad little boy stuck in 1999 as a toddler. No one is saying your memories of 1999 are invalid...we're saying to stop being a massive a**hole because you're not superior to 1999 borns or anyone else. GROW UP!.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:13 pm

I'm glad you finally learned how to use the quote button.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:15 pm

I'm glad you finally learned how to use the quote button.

;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:16 pm

The only idiot here is you. You're only grown in the sense of your age but not your mind...you're just a sad little boy stuck in 1999 as a toddler. No one is saying your memories of 1999 are invalid...we're saying to stop being a massive a**hole because you're not superior to 1999 borns or anyone else. GROW UP!.
80's babies think they're superior to 90's babies, and they ARE in fact superior to 90's babies. So since we're playing the superior game, I'm superior to you for having more memory and experience. DEAL WITH IT! WE ARE NOT THE SAME. GET IT THROUGH YOUR THICK HEAD.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:18 pm

Oh, I get it! This is Zelek's alt account!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:19 pm

Oh, I get it! This is Zelek's alt account!
No.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 2:19 pm

All of this '90s baby on '90s baby violence has just got to stop. Can't we all just get along?

Besides, you guys are never gonna be as awesome as me, Jordan and Howard anyway, so why keep fighting about it?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 2:20 pm

Oh, I get it! This is Zelek's alt account!

That's what I was suspecting ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:20 pm

All of this '90s baby on '90s baby violence has just got to stop. Can't we all just get along?

Besides, you guys are never gonna be as awesome as me, Jordan and Howard anyway, so why keep fighting about it?
SEE?!?!?! THERE'S THE ELITISM I WAS TALKING ABOUT!!!!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:21 pm

Oh, I get it! This is Zelek's alt account!

I don't know who he is but he's very annoying and ignorant.

All of this '90s baby on '90s baby violence has just got to stop. Can't we all just get along?

Besides, you guys are never gonna be as awesome as me, Jordan and Howard anyway, so why keep fighting about it?

Normally, I would be up for some satire and sarcasm but FunkSoulBrother96 is a real ignoramus.

That's what I was suspecting ;D

Whoever he is, he needs to STOP ASAP!.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:21 pm

SEE?!?!?! THERE'S THE ELITISM I WAS TALKING ABOUT!!!!!

Good job troll. The big boys are here now!. RUN ALONG!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:24 pm

Good job troll. The big boys are here now!. RUN ALONG!
Ughh don't you get it, stupid? They think they're better than you because they're 80's babies! Nobody's joking! No one's being a freaking troll!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:25 pm

Ughh don't you get it, stupid? They think they're better than you because they're 80's babies! Nobody's joking! No one's being a freaking troll!

Yes and I've seen pigs fly with my own 2 eyeballs ;).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:26 pm

All of this '90s baby on '90s baby violence has just got to stop. Can't we all just get along?

Besides, you guys are never gonna be as awesome as me, Jordan and Howard anyway, so why keep fighting about it?

I agree. It's just so sad to see lesser beings attempting to build themselves up.

That's what I was suspecting ;D

Right wing rhetoric? Check.
Arbitrary ageist cut off points? Check.

I think "ThePrequelsSuck" has decided to visit us at inthe00s.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:27 pm

Yes and I've seen pigs fly with my own 2 eyeballs ;).
Well open your eyes, and use your brain to realize that JordanK and Machine Head think they're better than us 90's babies.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 2:28 pm

Ughh don't you get it, stupid? They think they're better than you because they're 80's babies! Nobody's joking! No one's being a freaking troll!

They're pointing and laughing at you! Look! :-[

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:29 pm

Right wing rhetoric? Check.
Arbitrary ageist cut off points? Check.

I think "ThePrequelsSuck" has decided to visit us at inthe00s.

What is an alt account anyways? Why does Zelek even have one?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:29 pm

I agree. It's just so sad to see lesser beings attempting to build themselves up.

Right wing rhetoric? Check.
Arbitrary ageist cut off points? Check.

I think "ThePrequelsSuck" has decided to visit us at inthe00s.
SEE?! HE'S BEING AN ELITIST TOO!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:29 pm

Well open your eyes, and use your brain to realize that JordanK and Machine Head think they're better than us 90's babies.

Is that bad?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:30 pm

They're pointing and laughing at you! Look! :-[
They're laughing at the fact they're better than 90's babies.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:30 pm

What is an alt account anyways? Why does Zelek even have one?

Just an alternate account used for trolling or whatever. I dunno if this actually is Zelek but his accounts on GAF and IGN post the same things.

SEE?! HE'S BEING AN ELITIST TOO!!

Yes, I am elite. I did not deny this. My status is recognized because I have the certifications to back it up.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:31 pm

Is that bad?
Is it? 'Cause you seem to hate the fact that I think I'm better than '99-ers!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:32 pm

Just an alternate account used for trolling or whatever. I dunno if this actually is Zelek but his accounts on GAF and IGN post the same things.

Yes, I am elite. I did not deny this. My status is recognized because I have the certifications to back it up.
SEE, PEOPLE?! SEE?! CAN YOU SEE HIS ELITISM?! HE EVEN ADMITTED IT!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:33 pm

Is it? 'Cause you seem to hate the fact that I think I'm better than '99-ers!!

SEE, PEOPLE?! SEE?! CAN YOU SEE HIS ELITISM?!

What's so bad about their elitism? Older people are supreme to younger people....always...no matter what.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 2:34 pm

I agree. It's just so sad to see lesser beings attempting to build themselves up.

Right wing rhetoric? Check.
Arbitrary ageist cut off points? Check.

I think "ThePrequelsSuck" has decided to visit us at inthe00s.

Well... Not to mention the avatar. But that's a little on the nose. ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:35 pm

SEE, PEOPLE?! SEE?! CAN YOU SEE HIS ELITISM?!

Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite. You don't and that's why everyone is stretching their heads.

Well... Not to mention the avatar. But that's a little on the nose. ;D

LOL too true.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:36 pm

What's so bad about their elitism? Older people are supreme to younger people....always...no matter what.
THEN THAT MEANS I'M SUPERIOR TO YOU!! DON'T YOU GET IT?!?! I'M OLDER THAN YOU!! APRIL 1996!!!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:37 pm

Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite. You don't and that's why everyone is stretching their heads.

LOL too true.
SEE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! IF HE CAN DO IT TO 90's BABIES, THEN I CAN DO IT TO '99-ERS!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:38 pm

Well... Not to mention the avatar. But that's a little on the nose. ;D

LOL too true.

His avatar has kinda weirded me out. George W. Bush and Guy Fieri mixed together is a bad combination.

THEN THAT MEANS I'M SUPERIOR TO YOU!! DON'T YOU GET IT?!?! I'M OLDER THAN YOU!! APRIL 1996!!!!

Do you always speak in CAPS, FunkSoulTroll96? ???

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:39 pm

His avatar has kinda weirded me out. George W. Bush and Guy Fieri mixed together is a bad combination.
Do you always speak in CAPS, FunkSoulTroll96? ???
Shut up, stupid. I'm better than you '99-ers and don't forget it. And for the last time, get it through your thick head everybody, I am NOT trolling!!!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mqg96 on 06/10/17 at 2:39 pm

You're 21 years old... What "wisdom" could you possibly have to share?

Mid '90s and late '90s are right next to each other. You're only a few months older than people born in the late '90s. It's not a big difference.

And you were only 2 years old for a good chunk of '99. Sorry if none of this is believable. You seem to be one of those internet people that make a big deal out of being a "90s kid" and being superior to 2000s kid, when all you really remember about 1999 is getting potty trained and hiding your pacifier under the sofa. None of this counts as remembering the '90s. Sorry but you're not fooling anyone, and all this petty defensive just reveals your insecurities. Grow up.

Wooh, we hardly get the angry, COLD part of Slowpoke since he's a nice chill person 90% of the time. What does that tell you about this new user on here :o

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:40 pm

SEE?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?! IF HE CAN DO IT TO 90's BABIES, THEN I CAN DO IT TO '99-ERS!!

No you can't because 1996 babies aren't any different than 1999 babies. All the same inferior beings. ::)

Ask Howard and Machine Head, they'll fill you in.

His avatar has kinda weirded me out. George W. Bush and Guy Fieri mixed together is a bad combination.

Just as bad as Afro Bush.

Wooh, we hardly get the angry, COLD part of Slowpoke since he's a nice chill person 90% of the time. What does that tell you about this new user on here :o

It says that Zelek's trolling in overdrive.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:42 pm

No you can't because 1996 babies aren't any different than 1999 babies. All the same inferior beings. ::)

Ask Howard and Machine Head, they'll fill you in.

Just as bad as Afro Bush.

It says that Zelek's trolling in overdrive.
You wouldn't understand. This is between us 90's babies. Think of it as a war between someone close to your own date of birth.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:42 pm

Shut up, stupid. I'm better than you '99-ers and don't forget it. And for the last time, get it through your thick head everybody, I am NOT trolling!!!!

How'd you know stupid was my first name? :o

Wooh, we hardly get the angry, COLD part of Slowpoke since he's a nice chill person 90% of the time. What does that tell you about this new user on here :o

His trolling level is OVER 9000

Just as bad as Afro Bush.

Afro Bush sounds terrifying :o.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:43 pm

You wouldn't understand. This is between us 90's babies. Think of it as a war between someone close to your own date of birth.

Yeah... War... Look at mommy's little solider!

http://babynames.allparenting.com/images/stories/soldier-baby.jpg

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:44 pm

Yeah... War... Look at mommy's little solider!

http://babynames.allparenting.com/images/stories/soldier-baby.jpg
Stop...

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:45 pm

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_21019_1489381654.png

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_22272_1497038787.png

Hmmmm....

Stop...

Why? ::)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:47 pm

Yeah... War... Look at mommy's little solider!

http://babynames.allparenting.com/images/stories/soldier-baby.jpg

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_21019_1489381654.png

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_22272_1497038787.png

Hmmmm....

Why? ::)

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:47 pm

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_21019_1489381654.png

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_22272_1497038787.png

Hmmmm....

Why? ::)
This isn't about you 80's borns. We already know you're superior.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:48 pm

This isn't about you 80's borns. We already know you're superior.

But now I've gotta make you realize your own inferiority. You must own it.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:48 pm

This isn't about you 80's borns. We already know you're superior.

So are '90s babies superior to '00s babies? ???

But now I've gotta make you realize your own inferiority. You must own it.

I own my inferiority to '80s babies ::).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mqg96 on 06/10/17 at 2:49 pm

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_21019_1489381654.png

http://www.inthe00s.com/avatars_custom/avatar_22272_1497038787.png

Hmmmm....

Why? ::)

Yeah he took the hair from Guy Fieri who has a show on Food Network called Diners, Drive-In's, and Divens

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:50 pm

But now I've gotta make you realize your own inferiority. You must own it.
That's what I'm doing to these inferior '99-ers.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/10/17 at 2:51 pm

I own my inferiority to '80s babies ::).

Which is good. Now we must guide the Funk Soul Brother to find his path to acceptance.

Yeah he took the hair from Guy Fieri who has a show on Food Network called Diners, Drive-In's, and Divens

His profile picture bears a striking resemblance to Zelek's...

That's what I'm doing to these inferior '99-ers.

They are no more inferior compared to you. 90's babies are all the same.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 2:51 pm

"So are '90s babies superior to '00s babies? ???" Why yes. Yes we are.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 2:52 pm

Which is good. Now we must guide the Funk Soul Brother to find his path to acceptance.

We must!

"So are '90s babies superior to '00s babies? ???" Why yes. Yes we are.

Sounds great! 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:00 pm

We must!
Sounds great! 8)
I already accept my inferiority to 80's babies. Now you must accept your inferiority to Early '96-ers in this here hierarchy.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:02 pm

I already accept my inferiority to 80's babies. Now you must accept your inferiority to Early '96-ers.

But aren't we both '90s babies? ???

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:03 pm

But aren't we both '90s babies? ???
There are notable differences between Early's, Mid's, and Late's.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:06 pm

There are notable differences between Early's, Mid's, and Late's.

Yes but we are all bonded by being born in the best decade EVER! 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:07 pm

Yes but we are all bonded by being born in the best decade EVER! 8)
We are not bonded. We are divided into separate groups due to differences in memory and experience.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:08 pm

We are not bonded. We are divided into separate groups due to differences in memory and experience.

'90s babies are forever linked 8).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 3:09 pm

We are not bonded. We are divided into separate groups due to differences in memory and experience.

This reminds me of the caste system.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:10 pm

'90s babies are forever linked 8).
We may have been born in the same decade, but that does not make us exactly the same.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:10 pm

This reminds me of the caste system.
Yes.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:11 pm

This reminds me of the caste system.

Decadeism..is that a word?

We may have been born in the same decade, but that does not make us exactly the same.

But it makes us GREAT! ;)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:12 pm

But it makes us GREAT! ;)
Sure.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 3:12 pm

You '90s babies need to learn to put aside your differences for the better of your kind. Jordan's a few years older than me, but you don't see the two of us squabbling about who remembers the Cold War better, do you? No, that's because we figured out something long ago that you '90s babies have yet to learn. You must band together with the rest of your cohort so that you can take on the true enemy.

The Boomers.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:13 pm

You '90s babies need to learn to put aside your differences for the better of your kind. Jordan's a few years older than me, but you don't see the two of us squabbling about who remembers the Cold War better, do you? No, that's because we figured out something long ago that you '90s babies have yet to learn. You must band together with the rest of your cohort so that you can take on the true enemy.

The Boomers.

That's right!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:14 pm

You '90s babies need to learn to put aside your differences for the better of your kind. Jordan's a few years older than me, but you don't see the two of us squabbling about who remembers the Cold War better, do you? No, that's because we figured out something long ago that you '90s babies have yet to learn. You must band together with the rest of your cohort so that you can take on the true enemy.

The Boomers.
I have nothing against Boomers. My Dad's a Baby Boomer. Heck, I sure wish I had been born 40 years earlier.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 3:19 pm

I have nothing against Boomers. My Dad's a Baby Boomer. Heck, I sure wish I had been born 40 years earlier.

You may not hate them, but rest assured they hate you. This battle has been going on since before you were born and it will continue for many years to come, whether you choose to join the fight or not.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:23 pm

You may not hate them, but rest assured they hate you. This battle has been going on since before you were born and it will continue for many years to come, whether you choose to join the fight or not.
I don't blame them for hating younger generations. Ironically, I get along better with people over 40 than people of my own generation. I admire older people, and respect them. Because they lived through a better, simpler time. I'm jealous of Baby Boomers and Gen Xers. Everything about previous decades is better than the 2010's, aside from advances in technology, most of which people can live without.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 3:26 pm

All Boomers did was listen to awesome music made by people older than them, the get old, start the Iraq War and bankrupt the country. Now we're gonna have to spend years fixing all the damage they caused.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:30 pm

All Boomers did was listen to awesome music made by people older than them, the get old, start the Iraq War and bankrupt the country. Now we're gonna have to spend years fixing all the damage they caused.
Oh well. Too bad. I still wish I had been a part of their awesome generation. Instead of this crappy, messed up,anti-social one, where they rarely go outside, and don't know a thing about 'cool' like older generations did in their heyday.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 3:35 pm

A lot of the same stuff people wore throughout the Early - Mid 00's:

Men:

Hair: Spikey hair, frosted tips, Caesar cuts, bowl cuts, cornrows, fades, emo sidesweep...

Head items: Bandanas, du-rags, New Era fitted caps, Starter caps (Bulls Championship '98)...

Upper body: Blank shirts, 'tall tees', sport jerseys, polos, U.S. Polo As an. shirts, Starter jackets, black leather jackets, jean jackets...

Lower body: Camouflage cargos, beige or black cargos, capris, baggy jeans...

Shoes: White Nike Sweet Classics, black New Balance, strap sandals with white socks...

Accessories: Black waistpack, ear studs, one earring to the left...

Professional: Black blazer, light blue dress shirt, black necktie with geometric patterns, black Dockers dress pants, black K Swiss shoes...

Women:

Mostly blonde or natural, ponytail, headband, hoop earrings, jean jackets, blank baby tees, capris, low rise jeans, white Nike Sweet Classics, strap sandals, sleeveless mini with white stockings and sandals and a bag, waistpacks...

If you said that this fashion went on until the mid 2000s, then why does it make superior to you? I could remember the mid 2000s quite fine, so seeing if this occurred in both the early and mid 2000s doesn't make your points look good.

I only watched PBS Kids and Nick Jr before school. Then sometimes after school I'd watch DBZ and Yu Yu Hakusho on Toonami, then end the night with Pokemon or Tom and Jerry, or "Kids Say The Darndest Things".

I usually watched old Hanna-Barbara cartoons like Tom and Jerry around 2005-2006, so that doesn't really make you special compared to 1999 babies. Same with Pokemon (at least for the Kanto and Johto seasons).

I watched the fireworks on TV while building Legos with my cousin. We did stay up past midnight that day.

Okay. I believe you.

I do remember the day of 9/11. I wasn't an infant. I was a 5 year old in Kindergarten. Read my post about remembering 9/11 here: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=42764.2835

That had to deal with my experience, not yours. In which I did not remember because I was only an infant. Especially when I put that in first person. If I would say about your experience, then I would use "you", instead of "I". Not only that, but it didn't really affect me socially, economically, nor politically. If anything, the death of Osama Bin Laden had me know about the 9/11 attacks than the date itself. Ever since then, I was obsessed with seeing the Twin Towers before 9/11. Especially when seeing the Freedom Tower built for a year before it was completed.

Ah, but YOU don't remember 9/11, and SharksFan99 doesn't remember that day as well as I can. I wasn't a infant, baby or toddler either. I was a 5 year old in Kindergarten. 5 year olds aren't stupid. Therefore, our memories vary.

But you didn't know who caused the attacks until 6th grade, meaning that you were more innocent over 9/11. Your parents probably knew about Osama Bin Laden's plans before your teacher told you. Also, so what if I can't remember 9/11? At least I was alive during the attacks, meaning that I was probably doing something with my parents at the time. Just because I can't remember it, that doesn't mean I'm desperate into thinking that mid 90s babies are superior to late 90s babies.

Remembering 9/11 =/= being superior to people 3 years younger than you

We are not bonded. We are divided into separate groups due to differences in memory and experience.

Mid and late 90s babies are REALLY similar. So I don't know why you keep denying that?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:38 pm

If you said that this fashion went on until the mid 2000s, then why does it make superior to you? I could remember the mid 2000s quite fine, so seeing if this occurred in both the early and mid 2000s doesn't make your points look good.

I usually watched old Hanna-Barbara cartoons like Tom and Jerry around 2005-2006, so that doesn't really make you special compared to 1999 babies. Same with Pokemon (at least for the Kanto and Johto seasons).

Okay. I believe you.

That had to deal with my experience, not yours. In which I did not remember because I was only an infant. Especially when I put that in first person. If I would say about your experience, then I would use "you", instead of "I". Not only that, but it didn't really affect me socially, economically, nor politically. If anything, the death of Osama Bin Laden had me know about the 9/11 attacks than the date itself. Ever since then, I was obsessed with seeing the Twin Towers before 9/11. Especially when seeing the Freedom Tower built for a year before it was completed.

But you didn't know who caused the attacks until 6th grade, meaning that you were more innocent over 9/11. Your parents probably knew about Osama Bin Laden's plans before your teacher told you. Also, so what if I can't remember 9/11? At least I was alive during the attacks, meaning that I was probably doing something with my parents at the time. Just because I can't remember it, that doesn't mean I'm desperate into thinking that mid 90s babies are superior to late 90s babies.

Remembering 9/11 =/= being superior to people 3 years younger than you

Mid and late 90s babies are REALLY similar. So I don't know why you keep denying that?
You know what? At this point, there's no convincing you that we're different, even though we clearly are. So just keep believing that we aren't. I'm not gonna argue with you back and forth for all eternity.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 3:43 pm

Oh well. Too bad. I still wish I had been a part of their awesome generation. Instead of this crappy, messed up,anti-social one, where they rarely go outside, and don't know a thing about 'cool' like older generations did in their heyday.

Dude chill. There is nothing to be embarrassed about when you were born. You didn't get to choose when you were born, so it's foolish to be embarrassed/proud (that's not even mentioning how it has zero consequence on anything of relevance). Anyway, you could've just said this in the beginning instead of projecting your vulnerabilities on Reignman99 and saying embarrassing things and causing a scene in the process. No one here cares too much about when you were born, you can just relax and be yourself.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: SpyroKev on 06/10/17 at 3:44 pm

Well this thread got ruined. Ageism and silly banter thrown back and forth. Who the hell cares on what you remember in comparison to others anyways? The whole charm of being human is that you'll have your own experiences in a different time in a different place. Remembering different time periods is something that was supposed to be one of the unique and fascinating things about humanity. But now everyone is just using it to make themselves seem superior to others.

"Durr Hurr I remember . You younger folk will NEVER be able to experience what I had."

Like seriously why does anyone give a damn? I tend to make posts on what I recall from my past experiences, but I never make any jabs or comments on how people younger than me missed out or try to make myself feel special because of what I had. What you remember doesn't make you special in itself. We all remember different things which is what makes us all special. People need to get over themselves.

For a while I got sick of older people bragging about the "cool" stuff that they had when they were younger and always say nonsense like "Life was simpler back then". News flash older time periods ALWAYS LOOK SIMPLER! 1980s life looks simpler compared to the 2000s. 2000s life looks simpler compared to the present day or the upcoming 2020s. The 2020s will look simple when compared to the 2050s. Life being simpler "Back in your day" is literally a "no sh*t, Captain Obvious" kind of thing as this is what is supposed to happen as time progresses. If life stay the same as it was in the 1980s or 1990s then humanity literally fails due to lack of progression and adapting. And I can't stand younger people who get brainwashed by these generation elitists and try to say things like "I'm 15 and I hate everything past 2000" whatever. They look stupid saying this as it means they basically hated their own childhood and the things they grew up with.

Nostalgia and this ageist elitism needs to die or get toned down.

This is so accurate, I feel roasted. Haha

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:46 pm

Dude chill. There is nothing to be embarrassed about when you were born. You didn't get to choose when you were born, so it's foolish to be embarrassed/proud (that's not even mentioning how it has zero consequence on anything of relevance). Anyway, you could've just said this in the beginning instead of projecting your vulnerabilities on Reignman99 and saying embarrassing things and causing a scene in the process. No one here cares too much about when you were born, you can just relax and be yourself.
What are talking about? I'm not embarrassed of the year I was born. In fact, I'm better than those who are younger than me. I'm just saying I would like to have been born in a different time. That's all there is to it. After all, I'm sure the vast majority of people here do too. That's why people play the elitist/inferior game. We see it as a hierarchy. The year you were born is something to take pride in.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:46 pm

This is so accurate, I feel roasted. Haha

It is getting quite toasty in here, ain't it? ;) ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 3:50 pm

I already accept my inferiority to 80's babies. Now you must accept your inferiority to Early '96-ers in this here hierarchy.

So according to you, we should apparently look up 80s babies as superior beings? Man, you are extremely ageist. That has to be depressing to think that we should deal with age hierarchies, even though nobody has ever used that ideology on other people.

You '90s babies need to learn to put aside your differences for the better of your kind. Jordan's a few years older than me, but you don't see the two of us squabbling about who remembers the Cold War better, do you? No, that's because we figured out something long ago that you '90s babies have yet to learn. You must band together with the rest of your cohort so that you can take on the true enemy.

The Boomers.

This is why ageism is extremely useless and doesn't put out any positive ideas for anybody. Who really gives a sh*t if you don't remember the Cold War, 9/11, or any tragic event that happened in the last 30 years? That's why we have schools, so we could learn about said events for those who couldn't remember them. We have teachers who remember them, who give out their experiences for young minds.

You know what? At this point, there's no convincing you that we're different, even though we clearly are. So just keep believing that we aren't. I'm not gonna argue with you back and forth for all eternity.

There are millions of reasons why mid and late 90s are extremely similar. Some of which I said in several posts. Hell, my best online friend (mqg96) was born in the mid 90s and he believes that we're similar.

Dude chill. There is nothing to be embarrassed about when you were born. You didn't get to choose when you were born, so it's foolish to be embarrassed/proud (that's not even mentioning how it has zero consequence on anything of relevance). Anyway, you could've just said this in the beginning instead of projecting your vulnerabilities on Reignman99 and saying embarrassing things and causing a scene in the process. No one here cares too much about when you were born, you can just relax and be yourself.

Exactly. Nobody can ever control when they can be born, considering their birth development depends on their mother and father. Not the babies themselves.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 3:52 pm

This is why ageism is extremely useless and doesn't put out any positive ideas for anybody. Who really gives a sh*t if you don't remember the Cold War, 9/11, or any tragic event that happened in the last 30 years? That's why we have schools, so we could learn about said events for those who couldn't remember them. We have teachers who remember them, who give out their experiences for young minds.

mach!ne_he@d is joking bruv.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:55 pm

"So according to you, we should apparently look up 80s babies as superior beings? Man, you are extremely ageist. That has to be depressing to think that we should deal with age hierarchies, even though nobody has ever used that ideology on other people."

How are you not bothered by JordanK and Machine Head's comments? They even admitted that they're superior. They're not joking either.

"This is why ageism is extremely useless and doesn't put out any positive ideas for anybody. Who really gives a sh*t if you don't remember the Cold War, 9/11, or any tragic event that happened in the last 30 years? That's why we have schools, so we could learn about said events for those who couldn't remember them. We have teachers who remember them, who give out their experiences for young minds.

There are millions of reasons why mid and late 90s are extremely similar. Some of which I said in several posts. Hell, my best online friend (mqg96) was born in the mid 90s and he believes that we're similar."

Technically, we aren't the same due to small differences. But like I said, I can't convince you otherwise.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 3:55 pm

mach!ne_he@d is joking bruv.
He never said he was joking. What about JordanK? He even admitted he's superior to us and you're not even bothered the slightest.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:00 pm

He never said he was joking. What about JordanK? He even admitted he's superior to us and you're not even bothered the slightest.

Both of them are joking. I know this for a fact.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:01 pm

Both of them are joking. I know this for a fact.
But they never said they were joking.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 4:01 pm

Both of them are joking. I know this for a fact.

I'm not joking.

Early '90s babies are superior. We're Gen Alpha. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:02 pm

I'm not joking.

Early '90s babies are superior. We're Gen Alpha. :-X
See, ReignMan99?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:03 pm

But they never said they were joking.

They don't have to...I can tell.

I'm not joking.

Early '90s babies are superior. We're Gen Alpha. :-X

You're right but us late '90s babies are Gen Ultra :-X.

See, ReignMan99?

Yeah, I'm not blind :P.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:06 pm

"They don't have to...I can tell."

BULLCRAP. You're full of it and you know it. They even admitted they're better than you, and you're not even triggered? What's the matter with you? You're only on MY case 'cause we're 3 years apart. (Technically 4 since I'm 21)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:09 pm

"They don't have to...I can tell."

BULLCRAP. You're full of it and you know it. They even admitted they're better than you, and you're not even triggered? What's the matter with you? You're only on MY case 'cause we're 3 years apart. (Technically 4 since I'm 21)

It's not technically 4 but anyways...keep up the expert trolling.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:10 pm

It's not technically 4 but anyways...keep up the expert trolling.
I AM NOT TROLLING!! It is 4 because you're still 17. Again, why aren't you bothered by their elitism? How come you're only on MY case? Screw you.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:14 pm

I AM NOT TROLLING!! It is 4 because you're still 17. Again, why aren't you bothered by their elitism? How come you're only on MY case? Screw you.

Expert trolling indeed. Good work.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 4:16 pm

Somebody's gonna look at this and be shocked to see a 17 page thread about Space Jam.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:18 pm

Expert trolling indeed. Good work.
OH FOR F CK'S SAKE... I'M NOT TROLLING!!!!! WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO TO PROVE IT?! IF YOU WANT REAL PHOTOS, I CAN SHOW THEM RIGHT NOW TO YOUR CELLPHONE. GET OFF MY CASE, AND LOOK AT ALL THESE OTHER PEOPLE WHO ADMITTED THEIR ELITISM! THEY'RE NOT JOKING!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 4:18 pm

What are talking about? I'm not embarrassed of the year I was born. In fact, I'm better than those who are younger than me. I'm just saying I would like to have been born in a different time. That's all there is to it. After all, I'm sure the vast majority of people here do too. That's why people play the elitist/inferior game. We see it as a hierarchy.

We never see it as a hierarchy. This site was made for people's nostalgia, no matter how old they are. Even with the users who have been here since 2004 (the site's debut), they never see each other as inferior/superior people. Howard (born in 1974), Philip Eno (born in the late 50s) and nally (born in 1980) have always been friends and they never see themselves as inferiors due to their age. I even hang out with them on the forums and they never saw me as an inferior person ever.

mach!ne_he@d is joking bruv.

It was still legitimately motivating against FunkSoulBrother's bullcrap about mid and late 90s babies in a hierarchy against each other.

How are you not bothered by JordanK and Machine Head's comments? They even admitted that they're superior. They're not joking either.

They never said anything like that. If they would believe that, then they would've been arguing about who remembers the 80s/90s more. Even though it would be rather unintelligent because it's rather useless. You just think that because of your ageist hierarchy, even though it makes no logical sense in the premise.

Technically, we aren't the same due to small differences. But like I said, I can't convince you otherwise.

You mean those differences were you think 1999 babies are inferior to '96 babies? The ones were you think remembering 9/11 is a big deal, even though they could learn about it in school? Dude, just face it. We grew up with the same shows, movies and even music. Your "hierarchy" means nothing to anybody.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 4:18 pm

Somebody's gonna look at this and be shocked to see a 17 page thread about Space Jam.

That's still less than the number of times I watched the movie. 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:21 pm

Somebody's gonna look at this and be shocked to see a 17 page thread about Space Jam.

That's still less than the number of times I watched the movie. 8)

They'll be laughing for days ;D.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:21 pm

We never see it as a hierarchy. This site was made for people's nostalgia, no matter how old they are. Even with the users who have been here since 2004 (the site's debut), they never see each other as inferior/superior people. Howard (born in 1974), Philip Eno (born in the late 50s) and nally (born in 1980) have always been friends and they never see themselves as inferiors due to their age. I even hang out with them on the forums and they never saw me as an inferior person ever.

It was still legitimately motivating against FunkSoulBrother's bullcrap about mid and late 90s babies in a hierarchy against each other.

They never said anything like that. If they would believe that, then they would've been arguing about who remembers the 80s/90s more. Even though it would be rather unintelligent because it's rather useless. You just think that because of your ageist hierarchy, even though it makes no logical sense in the premise.

You mean those differences were you think 1999 babies are inferior to '96 babies? The ones were you think remembering 9/11 is a big deal, even though they could learn about it in school? Dude, just face it. We grew up with the same shows, movies and even music. Your "hierarchy" means nothing to anybody.
Well it does to the 80's babies around here. You all too freakin' stupid to see that they're elitists. They never even said they were joking.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:21 pm

OH FOR F CK'S SAKE... I'M NOT TROLLING!!!!! WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO TO PROVE IT?! IF YOU WANT REAL PHOTOS, I CAN SHOW THEM RIGHT NOW TO YOUR CELLPHONE. GET OFF MY CASE, AND LOOK AT ALL THESE OTHER PEOPLE WHO ADMITTED THEIR ELITISM! THEY'RE NOT JOKING!

Got lowercase letters? :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:22 pm

Got lowercase letters? :-X
Screw you.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 4:22 pm

That's still less than the number of times I watched the movie. 8)

Yeah, I've seen it probably a hundred times myself. Too bad that nobody born after 1995 can ever know the awesomeness that was Space Jam. Us Gen X kids born late '80s/early '90s are so lucky.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:23 pm

Screw you.

I'm sorry but I don't go that way (no offense) :-X.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:23 pm

"Us Gen X kids born late '80s/early '90s are so lucky." ELITISM!! LOOK!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:24 pm

I'm sorry but I don't go that way (no offense) :-X.
You're the one being a troll. I can't believe how freakin' stupid you are.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:27 pm

You're the one being a troll. I can't believe how freakin' stupid you are.

You do know that stupid is my first name, right? :o

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 4:28 pm

Yeah, I've seen it probably a hundred times myself. Too bad that nobody born after 1995 can ever know the awesomeness that was Space Jam. Us Gen X kids born late '80s/early '90s are so lucky.

That's roughly the number of times I saw it too. I had the entire dialogue memorized at the time, while the only sound the '96ers could produce was "googoo gaga" and the sound of producing spit bubbles :o

They missed out... they didn't have a childhood.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:32 pm

You do know that stupid is my first name, right? :o
Look, dirtbag, I'm not a troll. I'm 100% serious about everything I say here. I am not Zelek, or any other user. You're bogus. You're only bothered when I display elitism, yet you think it's a joke when other people do it. GET OFF MY CASE. So what about my avatar? I saw Zelek's avatar and I thought it would be funny to use a Guy Fieri one.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 4:35 pm

BULLCRAP. You're full of it and you know it. They even admitted they're better than you, and you're not even triggered? What's the matter with you? You're only on MY case 'cause we're 3 years apart. (Technically 4 since I'm 21)

That's because ageism in your case is incredibly stupid. It's so stupid that nobody would ever buy your ideas. Not even in an interesting manifesto.

Well it does to the 80's babies around here. You all too freakin' stupid to see that they're elitists. They never even said they were joking.

They never saw themselves as elitists. They're actually friendly with people younger than them, especially me and ReignMan99.

OH FOR F CK'S SAKE... I'M NOT TROLLING!!!!! WHAT DO YOU WANT ME TO DO TO PROVE IT?! IF YOU WANT REAL PHOTOS, I CAN SHOW THEM RIGHT NOW TO YOUR CELLPHONE. GET OFF MY CASE, AND LOOK AT ALL THESE OTHER PEOPLE WHO ADMITTED THEIR ELITISM! THEY'RE NOT JOKING!

XD ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Even my 15 year old self wouldn't argue against sh*t like this. The fact that you believe there is a true hierarchy makes you a laughingstock honestly.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:40 pm

Look, dirtbag, I'm not a troll. I'm 100% serious about everything I say here. I am not Zelek, or any other user. You're bogus. You're only bothered when I display elitism, yet you think it's a joke when other people do it. GET OFF MY CASE. So what about my avatar? I saw Zelek's avatar and I thought it would be funny to use a Guy Fieri one.

Trolling at it's finest here!

They never saw themselves as elitists. They're actually friendly with people younger than them, especially me and ReignMan99.
Correct!

XD ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Even my 15 year old self wouldn't argue against sh*t like this. The fact that you believe there is a true hierarchy makes you a laughingstock honestly.

IKR! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:44 pm

"That's because ageism in your case is incredibly stupid. It's so stupid that nobody would ever buy your ideas. Not even in an interesting manifesto."

No, what's stupid is that you think there aren't any differences in a 17 year old and a 21 year old's experiences.

"They never saw themselves as elitists. They're actually friendly with people younger than them, especially me and ReignMan99."

This is what I'm talking about. No matter how many times an 80's or Early 90's baby displays elitism, you assume it's a joke. Even when they say it isn't right in front of you. This is why I have no respect for you '99-ers. You're too dumb to see elitism when it's right in front of you.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 4:44 pm

Another reason I think it's Zelek is because I think he has a history of making alt accounts... If you guys remember "Cyrogenic" from last year, the guy who said he wanted to kill and shoot all liberals, one thing I noticed from looking back at his old posts is he made a lot of references to Star Wars and the prequels... Hmm. :-X

Zelek, come out and atone for your sins. ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:46 pm

Guys, I'm not trolling. I'm not Zelek. Why can't you people get it through your thick heads? I've only been here less than a month and people are already calling me a troll and a liar.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 4:47 pm

Another reason I think it's Zelek is because I think he has a history of making alt accounts... If you guys remember "Cyrogenic" from last year, the guy who said he wanted to kill and shoot all liberals, one thing I noticed from looking back at his old posts is he made a lot of references to Star Wars and the prequels... Hmm. :-X

Zelek, come out and atone for your sins. ;D
There's no way it could be Zelek. He's older than this user.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:49 pm

Another reason I think it's Zelek is because I think he has a history of making alt accounts... If you guys remember "Cyrogenic" from last year, the guy who said he wanted to kill and shoot all liberals, one thing I noticed from looking back at his old posts is he made a lot of references to Star Wars and the prequels... Hmm. :-X

Zelek, come out and atone for your sins. ;D

I wasn't here long enough to know who those Zelek alt accounts were. Did they act the same as FunkSoulBrother96?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:49 pm

There's no way it could be Zelek. He's older than this user.
Of course I'm not Zelek, freakin' idiots.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:49 pm

There's no way it could be Zelek. He's older than this user.

Whoever it is...they're a massive troll (serious or not).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:50 pm

Whoever it is...they're a massive troll (serious or not).
I. AM. NOT. ZELEK!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:52 pm

I. AM. NOT. ZELEK!!

ZELEK. NOT. AM. I!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 4:53 pm

'90s babies are forever linked 8).
Try saying that to a 1990 person and he will get all mad ;D

Whoever it is...they're a massive troll (serious or not).
I don't think he's trolling. I think he was being serious from the start.

I wasn't here long enough to know who those Zelek alt accounts were. Did they act the same as FunkSoulBrother96?
No. The original Zelek was a normal person.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:55 pm

"I don't think he's trolling. I think he was being serious from the start." No sh t, Sherlock!!!!!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 4:56 pm

Try saying that to a 1990 person and he will get all mad ;D
Some will. However, my stepbrother and Looney Toon were both born in 1990 and they don't care.

I don't think he's trolling. I think he was being serious from the start.
Maybe but he's still funny to watch rant.

No. The original Zelek was a normal person.

You're right ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:57 pm

ZELEK. NOT. AM. I!!
We have a real comedian over here. That was so funny I forgot to laugh.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 4:57 pm

Look, dirtbag, I'm not a troll. I'm 100% serious about everything I say here. I am not Zelek, or any other user. You're bogus. You're only bothered when I display elitism, yet you think it's a joke when other people do it. GET OFF MY CASE. So what about my avatar? I saw Zelek's avatar and I thought it would be funny to use a Guy Fieri one.

I don't think you would ever be Zelek, since he's at least sane and has a sense of humor. Zelek says stuff that is dull, but he at least tries to fool around with us. You on the other hand take everything so seriously, that there might be something wrong with you.

No, what's stupid is that you think there aren't any differences in a 17 year old and a 21 year old's experiences.

Maybe that's because I did hang out with several 21 year olds, in both real life and online. I could simply relate with them, especially towards my childhood.

This is what I'm talking about. No matter how many times an 80's or Early 90's baby displays elitism, you assume it's a joke. Even when they say it isn't right in front of you. This is why I have no respect for you '99-ers. You're too dumb to see elitism when it's right in front of you.

I do believe it's like a joke because they don't take it seriously, compared to you. You think that your early childhood memories are so important, that it makes late 90s babies inferior. Whereas people that are older than you don't believe that sh*t, especially where it never mattered to them.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 4:59 pm

I don't think you would ever be Zelek, since he's at least sane and has a sense of humor. Zelek says stuff that is dull, but he at least tries to fool around with us. You on the other hand take everything so seriously, that there might be something wrong with you.

Maybe that's because I did hang out with several 21 year olds, in both real life and online. I could simply relate with them, especially towards my childhood.

I do believe it's like a joke because they don't take it seriously, compared to you. You think that your early childhood memories are so important, that it makes late 90s babies inferior. Whereas people that are older than you don't believe that sh*t, especially where it never mattered to them.
Some people choose to not believe in the hierarchy. But I do. You're wrong. I'm right. Go ahead, keep thinking you're not inferior.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 5:03 pm

All of this '90s baby on '90s baby violence has just got to stop. Can't we all just get along?
1990 folks started all that BS first. Let's blame them.

"I don't think he's trolling. I think he was being serious from the start." No sh t, Sherlock!!!!!
Yeah, I knew you were bring serious all this time, but they thought I was lying. They didn't believe me.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:04 pm

We have a real comedian over here. That was so funny I forgot to laugh.

You're not sane so how can you feel any emotions? ???

I don't think you would ever be Zelek, since he's at least sane and has a sense of humor. Zelek says stuff that is dull, but he at least tries to fool around with us. You on the other hand take everything so seriously, that there might be something wrong with you.

There is something wrong with him ;D.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:05 pm

1990 folks started all that BS first. Let's blame them.

Geez guys, mach!ne_he@d is just joking.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:08 pm

Geez guys, mach!ne_he@d is just joking.
He isn't. He never said he was joking. You can't say he's joking unless he says he is, idiot. What if he really wasn't joking? What are you gonna do about it?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 5:10 pm

You must band together with the rest of your cohort so that you can take on the true enemy.

The Boomers.

You may not hate them, but rest assured they hate you. This battle has been going on since before you were born and it will continue for many years to come, whether you choose to join the fight or not.
I know you're joking, but I actually think it's the other way around. Most Boomers are nice people with very few being evil rulers. Millennials, on the other hand, hate them all because the hands of the few destroyed everything.

Geez guys, mach!ne_he@d is just joking.
Oh I know, but it's a reality that some 1990 people are the worst ageists out there. Look how many of them say they can't relate to those after 1992/93.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:11 pm

He isn't. He never said he was joking. You can't say he's joking unless he says he is, idiot. What if he really wasn't joking? What are you gonna do about it?

I have no doubts that he's joking.

Oh I know, but it's a reality that some 1990 people are the worst ageists out there. Look how many of them say they can't relate to those after 1992/93.

I know and that's so annoying.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:12 pm

"Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite."

- JordanK

That doesn't sound like a joke to me.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:14 pm

I'm not sure if he's Zelek or even Zelek has a history of making alt accounts, but Zelek did troll the 95ers/96ers for a bit by pretending to be born 1990 and calling '95/96ers Gen Z and being mid/late-2000s kids and not early 2000s.

Zelek's also really obsessed with arbitrary divides by birth year. He would go on gaming forums that have nothing to do with nostalgia and make threads oddly *specifically* about people born 1996/1997, and it confused a lot of the board members there too.

And, well, y'know Zelek is also very conservative lol.

But anyway, this is all speculation. I'm not the type to "just ask questions" and say crazy things. But sometimes I can be too skeptical, I mean, I'm still not 100% convinced Trump collaborated with Russia even though this is becoming increasingly obvious/common sense to everyone else. ;D

I'm just dropping this oppo, fake news and disinformation campaign for everyone else to chew on. :-X

OK, thanks for the info.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:15 pm

"Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite."

- JordanK

That doesn't sound like a joke to me.

JordanK1982 is an expert troller. I can also tell the sarcasm in his statement. Nice job, FunkySoul the Mega Troll 96.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:18 pm

JordanK1982 is an expert troller. I can also tell the sarcasm in his statement. Nice job, FunkySoul the Mega Troll 96.
He's not trolling, and neither am I. How many times do I have to tell you I'm not a troll? What will it take for you to see that I'm dead serious?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 5:21 pm

That guy was born 1995, this dude is born 1996. Zelek was born late 1995. Making up your birthdate doesn't really require an expert though.

He wasn't an ageist (but there weren't many users younger than 1996 borns last year) but he was very conservative, and obsessed with Star Wars, and being an early 2000s kid that knew all the trends.

I'm not sure if he's Zelek or even Zelek has a history of making alt accounts, but Zelek did troll the 95ers/96ers for a bit by pretending to be born 1990 and calling '95/96ers Gen Z and being mid/late-2000s kids and not early 2000s.

Zelek's also really obsessed with arbitrary divides by birth year. He would go on gaming forums that have nothing to do with nostalgia and make threads oddly *specifically* about people born 1996/1997, and it confused a lot of the board members there too.

And, well, y'know Zelek is also very conservative lol.

But anyway, this is all speculation. I'm not the type to "just ask questions" and say crazy things. But sometimes I can be too skeptical, I mean, I'm still not 100% convinced Trump collaborated with Russia even though this is becoming increasingly obvious/common sense to everyone else. ;D

I'm just dropping this oppo, fake news and disinformation campaign for everyone else to chew on. :-X
Right on that.

When Zelek first signed up, he didn't come on here as often as he is now nor was he asking questions about people childhood or some other humorous questions.

I know and that's so annoying.
I know and it's awful. Thankfully, none of my friends do that BS. The only time I even encounter ageism or elitism mainly is on YouTube.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:22 pm

He's not trolling, and neither am I. How many times do I have to tell you I'm not a troll? What will it take for you to see that I'm dead serious?

Get ready for some.....
http://www.martialtalk.com/data/photos/m/1/1003-1261413943-4da78155571abbbdd64ec16c7cb24f41.jpg

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:22 pm

I know and it's awful. Thankfully, none of my friends do that BS. The only time I even encounter ageism or elitism mainly is on YouTube.

Yeah, same here.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Zelek3 on 06/10/17 at 5:22 pm

Another reason I think it's Zelek is because I think he has a history of making alt accounts... If you guys remember "Cyrogenic" from last year, the guy who said he wanted to kill and shoot all liberals, one thing I noticed from looking back at his old posts is he made a lot of references to Star Wars and the prequels... Hmm. :-X

Zelek, come out and atone for your sins. ;D

Cyrogenic? Not me, I don't even remember that guy. I wouldn't threaten others online, that's a bad idea.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 5:24 pm

Cyrogenic? Not me, I don't even remember that guy. I wouldn't threaten others online, that's a bad idea.

Okay. I believe you (really). :-X I'll delete the other post.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:25 pm

Get ready for some.....
http://www.martialtalk.com/data/photos/m/1/1003-1261413943-4da78155571abbbdd64ec16c7cb24f41.jpg
I'm not trolling, dumb a s s. I even offered to show you my real photos.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 5:25 pm

Some people choose to not believe in the hierarchy. But I do. You're wrong. I'm right. Go ahead, keep thinking you're not inferior.

Nobody really believes that there is an age hierarchy. Even if that's true with your beliefs, it would make no sense whatsoever. Not everybody has the same mentality, experiences, or even remember things right. If that was the case, then it would've be like the novel, 1984.

He isn't. He never said he was joking. You can't say he's joking unless he says he is, idiot. What if he really wasn't joking? What are you gonna do about it?

Even though he said he wasn't joking, he wasn't implying that his posts was taken seriously. Even for me, I know that he isn't 100% serious, unlike you.

"Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite."

- JordanK

That doesn't sound like a joke to me.

First off, he didn't even say that. You just that made up. Secondly, he just jokingly said that he's superior against you because of how dull your ideas were.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Zelek3 on 06/10/17 at 5:26 pm

Can we stop arguing over age and get back to the topic of the thread? Come on.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:27 pm

I'm not trolling, dumb a s s. I even offered to show you my real photos.

Dammit...the troll spray didn't work. Drat! >:(

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:28 pm

Nobody really believes that there is an age hierarchy. Even if that's true with your beliefs, it would make no sense whatsoever. Not everybody has the same mentality, experiences, or even remember things right. If that was the case, then it would've be like the novel, 1984.

Even though he said he wasn't joking, he wasn't implying that his posts was taken seriously. Even for me, I know that he isn't 100% serious, unlike you.

First off, he didn't even say that. You just that made up. Secondly, he just jokingly said that he's superior against you because of how dull your ideas were.
"Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite."

JordanK said that. Look: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=55446.180

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:30 pm

See? Zelek3 arrived. I told you all I'm not trolling. Idiots...

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:32 pm

Can we stop arguing over age and get back to the topic of the thread? Come on.

Just lock the thread.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:33 pm

Just lock the thread.
SEE? I told you I wasn't trolling and you didn't believe me!! HAHAHA

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:35 pm

SEE? I told you I wasn't trolling and you didn't believe me!! HAHAHA

You are still trolling even though you aren't Zelek3.

Anyways, Max (Zelek3) just lock the thread.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 5:35 pm

Can we stop arguing over age and get back to the topic of the thread? Come on.
I looked back on how it began, and it started with a comment about young people not going to remember looney tunes in the future.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 5:36 pm

I'm not trolling, dumb a s s. I even offered to show you my real photos.

Then show your damn photos. Nobody is stopping you.

"Born in 1996 = No credentials. Not a real person because born after 1989.

Born before 1990 = Real person of the elites.

I have a reason to be elitist because I'm actually elite."

JordanK said that. Look: http://www.inthe00s.com/index.php?topic=55446.180

He said that just to joke with your bullcrap. It's not like he took it serious.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:36 pm

You are still trolling even though you aren't Zelek3.

Anyways, Max (Zelek3) just lock the thread.
You're wrong about that too, f cktard.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:38 pm

Then show your damn photos. Nobody is stopping you.

He said that just to joke with your bullcrap. It's not like he took it serious.
Of course he was serious, dumbo. Otherwise he would have said he wasn't serious.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 5:38 pm

You're wrong about that too, f cktard.

There's no need to swear, calm down.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:38 pm

There's no need to swear, calm down.
I didn't use the full word.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:39 pm

FunkSoulBrother96 is one of the most dedicated trolls I've ever seen. Can you let us discuss Space Jam 2? >:(

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:41 pm

FunkSoulBrother96 is one of the most dedicated trolls I've ever seen. Can you let us discuss Space Jam 2? >:(
You're wrong again. I'm not trolling. I'm 100% serious. Just like last time when you all didn't believe I wasn't Zelek3.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 5:41 pm

I didn't use the full word.

That's because you can't ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:42 pm

That's because you can't ;D
No sh t, Sherlock. I know how forums work.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:43 pm

You're wrong again. I'm not trolling. I'm 100% serious. Just like last time when you all didn't believe I wasn't Zelek3.

FunkSoulBrother96 is one of the most dedicated trolls I've ever seen. Can you let us discuss Space Jam 2? >:(

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 5:44 pm

No sh t, Sherlock. I know how forums work.

Okay, but the effect is the same nonetheless. You need to stop swearing and you need calm down. There's no age hierarchy, there's no age elitism, it's all in your head. Let it go.... Let it go...

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:44 pm

Eat my shorts.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 5:45 pm

I looked back on how it began, and it started with a comment about young people not going to remember looney tunes in the future.

FunkSoul made that comment, but the context of his message didn't really make a lot of sense. Which is probably why me and ReignMan99 argued against him for so long.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:45 pm

Okay, but the effect is the same nonetheless. You need to stop swearing and you need calm down. There's no age hierarchy, there's no age elitism, it's all in your head. Let it go.... Let it go...
No, it's real and other people out there believe in it too. 8-P

Like JordanK. You all don't think so, but you're all wrong about that as well. Just wait 'til he comes back.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:47 pm

Eat my shorts.

http://i.imgur.com/7evNYM5.gif

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 5:48 pm

FunkSoul made that comment, but the context of his message didn't really make a lot of sense. Which is probably why me and ReignMan99 argued against him for so long.

True but right now chillin' and maxin' 8).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 5:53 pm

No, it's real and other people out there believe in it too. 8-P

Like JordanK. You all don't think so, but you're all wrong about that as well. Just wait 'til he comes back.

Oh my sweet summer child... There are a certain few who are superior, but 1996 and 1999 is the same, there's nothing to brag about. 1980s babies are on another level. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 5:53 pm

The only thing I want to know is whether or not FunkSoulBrother96 is collaborating with the Russians or not. Does he know who leaked the Trump dossier? We need a Special Prosecutor to get to the bottom of all of this.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 5:55 pm

Oh my sweet summer child... There are a certain few who are superior, but 1996 and 1999 is the same, there's nothing to brag about. 1980s babies are on another level. :-X
You see that, ReignMan99?! Huh? You think he's joking?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 5:59 pm

You see that, ReignMan99?! Huh? You think he's joking?

1980s babies remember the entire '90s, that's why they are kings. But at least us early '90s remember the late '90s, so we have special status. Mid and late '90s however will never experience the '90s. They will never have a real childhood or experience true happiness.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 6:00 pm

Like JordanK. You all don't think so, but you're all wrong about that as well. Just wait 'til he comes back.

Jordan wouldn't really care nonetheless. He's basically going to joke around on your age hierarchy, since nobody actually gives a crap about that.

Oh my sweet summer child... There are a certain few who are superior, but 1996 and 1999 is the same, there's nothing to brag about. 1980s babies are on another level. :-X

Which is why Jordan and machinehead don't really take FunkSoul by word, since they never argued against crap that they remembered.

You see that, ReignMan99?! Huh? You think he's joking?

Yeah, but that's because 1980s babies are way different compared to 1996 and 1999 babies. You're basically riled up over a small difference. Especially since we have little to no memories of the 90s.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/10/17 at 6:00 pm

I'd be more impress if you were born 1994.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/10/17 at 6:02 pm

This thread is now like this.....

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tbOA22zZzNA/V4FGVn-dN3I/AAAAAAAAKtI/AfD5jj5Rn0MDrNkD0xlSrMMXWrwOvklIQCCo/s350/MwenPaKaPale.gif

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 6:02 pm

"You're basically riled up over a small difference. Especially since we have little to no memories of the 90s." Get outta here. I remember way more than you do. And at least I can remember 9/11.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:03 pm

I'm superior to 2001 borns because I have memories from 2001 and I was 2 :P.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 6:04 pm

I'm superior to 2001 babies because I have memories from 2001 and I was 2 :P.
You're probably right. You can totally believe that.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 6:06 pm

Yeah, this thread is pretty much a huge dumpster fire right now. But it's still damn sure entertaining.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 6:08 pm

Yeah, this thread is pretty much a huge dumpster fire right now. But it's still damn sure entertaining.
Agreed ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:08 pm

Yeah, this thread is pretty much a huge dumpster fire right now. But it's still damn sure entertaining.

Agreed ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Yep ;D.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 6:09 pm

This thread is now like this.....

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tbOA22zZzNA/V4FGVn-dN3I/AAAAAAAAKtI/AfD5jj5Rn0MDrNkD0xlSrMMXWrwOvklIQCCo/s350/MwenPaKaPale.gif

The only way it can be saved is if the lessors stop posting. :-X Or if Zelek finally locks the thread. ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 6:09 pm

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tbOA22zZzNA/V4FGVn-dN3I/AAAAAAAAKtI/AfD5jj5Rn0MDrNkD0xlSrMMXWrwOvklIQCCo/s350/MwenPaKaPale.gif

FunkSoulBrother96's posts in a nutshell.

Get outta here. I remember way more than you do. And at least I can remember 9/11.

You still can't remember the entirety of the 90s though. Just get over it dude. Your 1999 memories aren't as clear as Jordan or Machinehead's perspectives of the year.

Yeah, this thread is pretty much a huge dumpster fire right now. But it's still damn sure entertaining.

It's more like a huge derailment, thanks to FunkSoul.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 6:10 pm

I'm superior to 2001 borns because I have memories from 2001 and I was 2 :P.
;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

We're all superior to each other if you honestly think about it. Who wants to be a beta male anyway?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 6:11 pm

The only way it can be saved is if the lessors stop posting. :-X Or if Zelek finally locks the thread. ;D
See, ReignMan99? An Early 90's baby thinks Mid - Late 90's babies are lesser-beings! Why are you not triggered?!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/10/17 at 6:11 pm

The only way it can be saved is if the lessors stop posting. :-X Or if Zelek finally locks the thread. ;D

;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:11 pm

I'll just leave this here...
https://cdn-webimages.wimages.net/050c60f1916f18787224025d635b4c86d72ff6-wm.jpg?v=3

That's the truth^ :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 6:12 pm

FunkSoulBrother96's posts in a nutshell.

You still can't remember the entirety of the 90s though. Just get over it dude. Your 1999 memories aren't as clear as Jordan or Machinehead's perspectives of the year.

It's more like a huge derailment, thanks to FunkSoul.
So what if I can't remember the entirety of the 90's? The bottom line is I still remember more than you. So take that.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 6:13 pm

I'll just leave this here...
https://cdn-webimages.wimages.net/050c60f1916f18787224025d635b4c86d72ff6-wm.jpg?v=3

That's the truth^ :-X
One of my friends has that mentality. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:14 pm

;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

We're all superior to each other if you honestly think about it. Who wants to be a beta male anyway?

NO ONE. Beta males are a glitch in the Matrix :-X.

See, ReignMan99? An Early 90's baby thinks Mid - Late 90's babies are lesser-beings! Why are you not triggered?!

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/facebook/001/185/750/a53.jpg

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:15 pm

One of my friends has that mentality. :-X

That sucks.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 80sfan on 06/10/17 at 6:16 pm

FunkSoulBrother96's posts in a nutshell.

You still can't remember the entirety of the 90s though. Just get over it dude. Your 1999 memories aren't as clear as Jordan or Machinehead's perspectives of the year.

It's more like a huge derailment, thanks to FunkSoul.

Philip Eno is the one that remembers the most on here, so far. :o

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 6:17 pm

I'll just leave this here...
https://cdn-webimages.wimages.net/050c60f1916f18787224025d635b4c86d72ff6-wm.jpg?v=3

That's the truth^ :-X

How much you want to bet that meme was started by a 1996 baby who thinks he's a '90s kid? '80s babies wouldn't stoop to the level of trashing 2000's borns. Hell we're old enough to be their fathers.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 6:17 pm

Philip Eno is the one that remembers the most on here, so far. :o

It's a good thing he hasn't seen this thread. The face palm would be cosmic. :o

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:19 pm

How much you want to bet that meme was started by a 1996 baby who thinks he's a '90s kid? '80s babies wouldn't stoop to the level of trashing 2000's borns. Hell we're old enough to be their fathers.

You're correct!

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 6:24 pm

So what if I can't remember the entirety of the 90's? The bottom line is I still remember more than you. So take that.

So? I really don't care if you remember 1999-2001. You were only a toddler at the time, in which most of your memories at the time were vague and blurry. Add to the fact that most early childhood memories can fade, it doesn't really make it important.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/science/early-childhood-memories.html?_r=0

It's a good thing he hasn't seen this thread. The face palm would be cosmic. :o

He would've been more wise compared to FunkSoul.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 6:24 pm

How much you want to bet that meme was started by a 1996 baby who thinks he's a '90s kid? '80s babies wouldn't stoop to the level of trashing 2000's borns. Hell we're old enough to be their fathers.

I'm not even trolling, but that's how I actually feel about it. To me, the generational differences between me and my sisters born 2005 seem self-evident. But when I went on PersonalityCafé and saw a lot of early 2000s/late 1990s babies bashing 2005 borns as "the real Gen Z", it came across as really childish. If you feel a sense of competition and threat from people born 2005 or in the 2000s, and not see them as just adorable little kids, then you're not as old as you think you are ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 6:34 pm

NO ONE. Beta males are a glitch in the Matrix :-X.
Right on that! We're all Alpha males/females ;)

That sucks.
I know. He even thinks that 2000s people don't know sh!t

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/10/17 at 6:35 pm

I'm not even trolling, but that's how I actually feel about it. To me, the generational differences between me and my sisters born 2005 seem self-evident. But when I went on PersonalityCafé and saw a lot of early 2000s/late 1990s babies bashing 2005 borns as "the real Gen Z", it came across as really childish. If you feel a sense of competition and threat from people born 2005 or in the 2000s, and not see them as just adorable little kids, then you're not as old as you think you are ;D

Yeah, I see that stuff on YouTube all the time. Like, I'll be watching some video about 2005 and some 12-year-old will say something about how they wish they were older so they could've experienced it, and then some grown ass 1997er will appear out of nowhere and start destroying them It's like, dude you're a 20-year-old attacking a kid because they can't remember something that happened when you were just a 2nd grader anyways?

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 6:35 pm

So? I really don't care if you remember 1999-2001. You were only a toddler at the time, in which most of your memories at the time were vague and blurry. Add to the fact that most early childhood memories can fade, it doesn't really make it important.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/27/science/early-childhood-memories.html?_r=0

He would've been more wise compared to FunkSoul.
First of all, you don't know me like that, and second of all, my memories from 1999 - 2001 are NOT blurry. Especially from ages 4 to 5. After 3, you're no longer a toddler. I remember 1999 - 2001 like it was yesterday. That's not blurry at all.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:37 pm

Right on that! We're all Alpha males/females ;)
Hell yeah! ;)

I know. He even thinks that 2000s people don't know sh!t

Well, that's stupid.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:40 pm

Yeah, I see that stuff on YouTube all the time. Like, I'll be watching some video about 2005 and some 12-year-old will say something about how they wish they were older so they could've experienced it, and then some grown ass 1997er will appear out of nowhere and start destroying them It's like, dude you're a 20-year-old attacking a kid because they can't remember something that happened when you were just a 2nd grader anyways?

I'm basically 18 and don't feel threatened by a 2005 born saying that they wish that they could've experienced 2005 instead of being just born in it. However, I do feel a bit irked when I see a 12 year old saying that they miss the '00s and "OMG, Lemonade Mouth was the best 2000s Disney Channel movie EVER!". However, I don't bash them or feel superior to them in any way.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/10/17 at 6:41 pm

Hell yeah! ;)
Well, that's stupid.
Yeah man!!!

I know, but at least he doesn't do it as often as some others.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:46 pm

Yeah man!!!

I know, but at least he doesn't do it as often as some others.

That's good.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 6:48 pm

Anyways, here is the Space Jam website that is still up and hasn't been changed since 1996:

https://www.warnerbros.com/archive/spacejam/movie/jam.htm

This is so cool. For me being a person who never got to experience the Web in the '90s, this site is definitely a time machine. Awesome! 8).

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 6:59 pm

Yeah, I see that stuff on YouTube all the time. Like, I'll be watching some video about 2005 and some 12-year-old will say something about how they wish they were older so they could've experienced it, and then some grown ass 1997er will appear out of nowhere and start destroying them It's like, dude you're a 20-year-old attacking a kid because they can't remember something that happened when you were just a 2nd grader anyways?

Wow, that is pretty sad. This is why I don't let them have a YouTube or any social media account (except Facebook). You never know what kind of crazy person they'll come across on the Internet, and ruin their innocence/self esteem. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/10/17 at 7:03 pm

Anyways, here is the Space Jam website that is still up and hasn't been changed since 1996:

https://www.warnerbros.com/archive/spacejam/movie/jam.htm

This is so cool. For me being a person who never got to experience the Web in the '90s, this site is definitely a time machine. Awesome! 8).

That's a sick find. It looks exactly how I remember the Internet being. :o

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 7:08 pm

That's a sick find. It looks exactly how I remember the Internet being. :o

Yeah, it's pretty cool. I can't believe Warner Bros. persevered the site....I guess that means they've been planning a sequel since then ;D

I found other preserved sites from 1996:

http://www.livingroomcandidate.org/websites/cg96/ (Bill Clinton's Campaign website from 1996)

http://www.dolekemp96.org/main.htm (Bob Dole's Campaign website from 1996)

Take a look at American politics 21 years ago^ 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 7:21 pm

First of all, you don't know me like that, and second of all, my memories from 1999 - 2001 are NOT blurry. Especially from ages 4 to 5. After 3, you're no longer a toddler. I remember 1999 - 2001 like it was yesterday. That's not blurry at all.

How do you see it like it was yesterday? Like you see it as clear? I mean, it's not like you told anybody what made your 1999-2001 memories that important.

Wow, that is pretty sad. This is why I don't let them have a YouTube or any social media account (except Facebook). You never know what kind of crazy person they'll come across on the Internet, and ruin their innocence/self esteem. :-X

Sadly, I have to learn that the hard way when I was an angst user on Deviantart. Those conversations that I had back when I was 14 were long and cringeworthy at the same time.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 7:32 pm

"How do you see it like it was yesterday? Like you see it as clear? I mean, it's not like you told anybody what made your 1999-2001 memories that important." My memories from 1999 - 2001 are crystal clear. The fact that I can remember more than you is what's important. Some people have a sharp memory. Accept it and move on.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 8:04 pm

My memories from 1999 - 2001 are crystal clear. The fact that I can remember more than you is what's important. Some people have a sharp memory. Accept it and move on.

So? That doesn't mean it's okay for you to brag about people's memories just because they're younger than you. I wouldn't even accept it as a hierarchy at all.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 8:13 pm

So? That doesn't mean it's okay for you to brag about people's memories just because they're younger than you. I wouldn't even accept it as a hierarchy at all.
Don't believe in it then. I'm allowed to brag as I please.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 8:27 pm

Don't believe in it then. I'm allowed to brag as I please.

https://media2.giphy.com/media/G4ZNYMQVMH6us/giphy.gif

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 8:32 pm

Good. That'd better the end of it.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 8:33 pm

Sir Rothchild, my man, just leave FunkySoul the Mega Troll 96 alone in his la la land aka just ignore him.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 8:34 pm

Sir Rothchild, my man, just leave FunkySoul the Mega Troll 96 alone in his la la land aka just ignore him.
I'm not a troll and you all '99-ers are the ones in la la land.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 8:36 pm

I'm not a troll and you all '99-ers are the ones in la la land.

Just delete your account mate.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 8:37 pm

Just delete your account mate.
You first. 8-P

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/10/17 at 9:48 pm

I'm not a troll and you all '99-ers are the ones in la la land.

You know, I dealt with many trolls in my life and I felt guilty after encountering them. But you are right about not being a troll. You are indeed a very depressing man. I can't believe you actually freak out like this as you are 13, but you are actually 21 years old. Just go somewhere else, since this forum is not really for you.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: FunkSoulBrother96 on 06/10/17 at 9:54 pm

You know, I dealt with many trolls in my life and I felt guilty after encountering them. But you are right about not being a troll. You are indeed a very depressing man. I can't believe you actually freak out like this as you are 13, but you are actually 21 years old. Just go somewhere else, since this forum is not really for you.
Nah, I'm good. We just have different beliefs. Besides, some of the things people post on here are very interesting. As long as we don't talk about age differences we'll get along fine. Even when I get political, I don't take it personally and force my opinions. But with the age thing, I get pissed because I wish I had been born in a different time. It sucks and I know there's obviously nothing I can do about it unless time travel's invented. I didn't mean to call you guys inferior. I only said that out of frustration. You guys are alright.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/10/17 at 10:09 pm

Nah, I'm good. We just have different beliefs. Besides, some of the things people post on here are very interesting. As long as we don't talk about age differences we'll get along fine. Even when I get political, I don't take it personally and force my opinions. But with the age thing, I get pissed because I wish I had been born in a different time. It sucks and I know there's obviously nothing I can do about it unless time travel's invented. I didn't mean to call you guys inferior. I only said that out of frustration. You guys are alright.

Ah OK, there it is. Thank you.

Now...let's move on.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/11/17 at 5:09 am

No. All kids born in the 90's are all the same, aren't real people and are inferior to those of us born in the 60's-80's like me, Machine Head and Howard.

Howard is clearly the superior one here. Kids born in 1996 trying to play off some superior trip? Please. Who let the babies into the adults club? ::)

;D Good one, Jordan.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/11/17 at 5:11 am

Continue the trolling....life is going to be a pain if you don't grow up quick.

;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/11/17 at 5:12 am

All of this '90s baby on '90s baby violence has just got to stop. Can't we all just get along?

Besides, you guys are never gonna be as awesome as me, Jordan and Howard anyway, so why keep fighting about it?

We're awesome. O0

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/11/17 at 5:18 am

Can we stop arguing over age and get back to the topic of the thread? Come on.

I agree.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/11/17 at 5:20 am

Yeah, this thread is pretty much a huge dumpster fire right now. But it's still damn sure entertaining.

I agree.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Sir Rothchild on 06/11/17 at 11:07 am

Nah, I'm good. We just have different beliefs. Besides, some of the things people post on here are very interesting. As long as we don't talk about age differences we'll get along fine. Even when I get political, I don't take it personally and force my opinions. But with the age thing, I get pissed because I wish I had been born in a different time. It sucks and I know there's obviously nothing I can do about it unless time travel's invented. I didn't mean to call you guys inferior. I only said that out of frustration. You guys are alright.

Oh. I guess that makes sense since most of your posts felt forced. I should've known, especially since I had the same thing with other websites before.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mach!ne_he@d on 06/11/17 at 1:08 pm

Honestly, FunkSoulBrother96 does have a kickass avatar, though. Makes me laugh every time I see it.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/11/17 at 3:03 pm

Honestly, FunkSoulBrother96 does have a kickass avatar, though. Makes me laugh every time I see it.

I'm the opposite....it makes me creeped out everytime I see it :-\\.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/11/17 at 3:13 pm

I'm the opposite....it makes me creeped out everytime I see it :-\\.

It's a good thing there are no avatars on mobile. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/11/17 at 4:09 pm

It's a good thing there are no avatars on mobile. :-X

Yeah, thank goodness :-X.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: 2001 on 06/11/17 at 9:08 pm

Yeah, thank goodness :-X.

Also, Jordan still hasn't apologized for his shameless elitism. :-X

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: Howard on 06/12/17 at 2:36 pm

I'm the opposite....it makes me creeped out everytime I see it :-\\.

It's like Guy Fieri had sex with George Bush. ;D

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: TheReignMan99 on 06/12/17 at 4:00 pm

It's like Guy Fieri had sex with George Bush. ;D

I know :-\\ 8-P.

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: JordanK1982 on 06/13/17 at 2:37 pm

Also, Jordan still hasn't apologized for his shameless elitism. :-X

Why should I apologize for being elite. ;)

;D ;D ;D

We're awesome. O0

I agree, Howard. We're all awesome! 8)

;D Good one, Jordan.

Thanks. 8)

Subject: Re: Why are they making a Space Jam sequel when it already had a sequel in 2003?

Written By: mxcrashxm on 06/15/17 at 6:35 pm

It's a good thing there are no avatars on mobile. :-X

Yeah, thank goodness :-X.
Uh, that depends if your phone is vertical or horizontal. In horizontal view, I can see his avatar. On the tablet, I can definitely see it since it acts as a PC.

Check for new replies or respond here...