» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 07/25/03 at 02:37 p.m.

in my oppion wrestling has gone down hill  during the past three years  its nothing but over the top  adult sick large men orainted crap and heres why i think  that  

the  year was 1976  a new man came  in to the wwwf (the name it was known as at the time)  a man that will change wrestling history  a man that will  re write the record books  that man is hulk hogan  now dont get me  i cant stand the guy but he did change the sport  the year was 1986 it was billed the biggest wrestlemania of all time (wich is true) the main event was hulk hogan (who was maineventing his  2nd wrestlemania  1985 was his first)  vs andry the giant  the match sucked but what happend that night  starded  they most  incredeble gimmik ever in wrestling history  when he bodyslamed andry and naild his famous legdrop and pined him  hulkamania was born  and hulkamania was sordified when he defeated the iron sherk a couple months later to become wwf champion hulkamania lasted up to 93 now the reson i mentiond  this is because the wwe dose not take its time to develop gimmiks  sure   most of  them sucked but at lest the time was taken to delvelop most of them these days it just dosent matter.  storylines these days suck and are affencive the kaity fick angle is a prime example   and now that paul tripleh laversquie going to marry steph its going to get much worse  i cant stand the guy hes big heded  arrogant and greedy  he books matches to suit him self ie  so hell win  every match  no wrestler is save from him any case back to the topic  wrestling has changed so much during the years the wwes has so many great tallented wrestlers old new so beats me when vince decideds to  push worthliss people like bigshow triple goldberg  theyve just signd ultimo dragon to a wwe contract how they going to use him i fear the worse fror him concerdering the fact  that wwe dose not use its   foergn wrestlers well take tajjerie for instence hes an  excellent worker  great tallent but what do the wee do with him  give him an embarracing role as regals assitint nice way to introuduce graeat wrestlers vince in any case my deapest fears is confirmed the wwe is going down to hell  in the it sucks department whats youre veiws on this

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: 80sRocked on 07/25/03 at 02:57 p.m.

I used to love watching WWF on Saturday nights back in the 80s-early 90s.  

But now its just so scripted and its like watching a really badly written soap opera.  I am amazed it still has such a huge following.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: 1992thousand on 07/25/03 at 05:04 p.m.

the WWE's ratings are have been falling hard since about summer 2001(ironically, around the time that they ate up WCW and ECW). Theyre now in between where they were before Stone Cold  began to gain recognition and Stone Cold becoming champ. So basically, they've been set back a whole 5-6 years. And deservedly so, the gimmicks and storylines ive been seeing since the Rock and Stone Cold became stars have mostly put me to sleep, although they did bring wrestling ratings to all time highs. But finally people are getting tired of Vince Mcmahons crap.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 07/25/03 at 07:45 p.m.

I've been a wrestling fan for 15 years and wrestling is on a downfall.All we have now is an Unmasked Kane,Tori sleeping with Jamie Noble next week,Stephanie and Sable are gonna catfight,Zach and Vince wrestling for something silly.I don't watch much anyways.It turned to garbage. >:(

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: John_Seminal on 07/25/03 at 11:19 p.m.


Quoting:
I used to love watching WWF on Saturday nights back in the 80s-early 90s.  

But now its just so scripted and its like watching a really badly written soap opera.  I am amazed it still has such a huge following.
End Quote



I watched it in the early 80's too. It was that or Dynasty or Dallas, so I picked the least soapy show. But I watched it before the WWF, when they had the Von Ericks. It was okay, but you always knew who was going to win. I think I stopped following wrestling around the time Mike Tyson was getting popular. Boxing became my new interest.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 07/26/03 at 08:36 a.m.

You know your wrestling Mr Crowly. I must clarify a few things though.

Hulk Hogan defeated the Iron Shiek before Wrestlemania 1 to win the WWF title. The first Wrestlemania showed Hulk Hogan and Mr T feud with 'Rowdy' Roddy Piper and Paul Orndorff.

The second Wrestlemania was Hulk Hogan wrestling King Kong Bundy in a steel cage to defend his title in 1986. The third, in 1987, was the now legendry Hulk Hogan v Andre The Giant. Hulk successfully defended the belt. I agree with you Mr Crowly - it was the best wrestling P-P-V ever!

Hulk Hogan dropped the title before Wrestlemania 4, Andre beat Hulk Hogan but 'The Million Dollar man' Ted Dibiase wanted to buy the belt off him. Andre accepted but Jack Tunney didn't like the idea of giving away titles (how times have changed) and so offered it up in a tournament at Wrestlemania 4. 'Machoman' Randy Savage won the title, defeating Ted Dibiase in the final and held the belt for a year.

Hulk Hogan beat 'Machoman' Randy Savage for the belt at Wrestlemania 5 and kept it for a year before getting defeated by Ultimate Warrior at Wrestlemania 6.

Because Hogan headlined every Wrestlemania from 1 - 9, it didn't mean he kept the belt for 9 years. Hogan was 'retired' for almost a year before coming back shortly before Wrestlemania 9.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 07/26/03 at 09:01 a.m.

I agree with you 100% on everything you have said, Mr Crowly. Raw is awful because Triple H commanded so much of it, Bigshow, Triple H, Kevin Nash and Goldberg are awful - I saw this guy in WCW and he was awful then so imagine my enthusiasm when he came to WWE (i.e not much). Brock Lesnar is the only big man to hold my interest for any length of time.

The offensive plot lines are not just that, they are degrading! If anyone saw Badd Blood recently, we were 'treated' to a pie eating contest involving the decrepid Mae Young. What was worse was that Steve Austen stunnered her afterwards! It almost rivalled her infamous appearance at Royal Rumble 2000 when she took her bra off (remember, this woman is about 70 or so)!

The problem at the moment is that the WWE are trying to turn the whole thing into a soap opera first, then a wrestling event second - the downside to this is that the wrestlers are just athletes and not actors. The acting scenes are always wooden and they sound like they are reading from boards! Everything sounds and seems forced and desperate.

Also, normal wrestlers are portrayed as superhuman. Fifteen years or so ago, the superhuman was the rarity (Hulk Hogan, Ultimate Warrior . . .) now you see people kicking out of multiple special moves left, right and centre and the Superhumans are not just slamming bigger wrestlers (Hulk Hogan struggled to slam which gave him an air of humanity behind his superhuman status) they are suplexing, belly to belly suplexing and tossing them about like they are rag dolls. The conviction goes out of the window then.

The WWE's lack of vision is as legendary as the Hulk Hogan v Andre The Giant match. Tajiri and Tommy Dreamer are absolutely underutilized (both were big hits in ECW) and I expect Ultimo Dragon to suffer the same fate.

Sorry for a long post - I couldn't let the opportunity go to waste.  :)



Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 07/26/03 at 10:29 a.m.

They think that bringing back the old fogeys will boost ratings.I think that's buloney.They already got rid of Piper and Hogan.

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 07/26/03 at 03:39 p.m.

I think the WWE should concentrate on giving 'character control' to the wrestlers. That way they can do what they wish. The WWE writers are very one dimensional.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 07/27/03 at 01:53 p.m.


Quoting:
I think the WWE should concentrate on giving 'character control' to the wrestlers. That way they can do what they wish. The WWE writers are very one dimensional.
End Quote



So is the booking committee. ::)

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 07/27/03 at 05:12 p.m.

I think the bookers should go lightly on the 'Dusty Screw Job'. Smackdown are getting better in respect of this, seeing matches won decisively.

I never understood why bookers favoured the 'interference' ending in matches (this is one of Raw's many downfalls). One interference every six months would make the match more controversial than once every match. I believe the writers are just lazy.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: RockandRollFan on 07/27/03 at 05:40 p.m.

Macho Pigs wearing tight shorts grabbing each other everywhere...mmmm.. Goldberg has a new move called the "Than-FranThisco Treat"  ::)

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: 80sRocked on 07/28/03 at 02:20 p.m.


Quoting:
Macho Pigs wearing tight shorts grabbing each other everywhere...mmmm.. Goldberg has a new move called the "Than-FranThisco Treat"  ::)
End Quote



HAHA!! ;D

I never thought about it that way.  Wouldn't surprise me though. :D

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 07/28/03 at 07:11 p.m.

I just wish that Vince would stop pushing the old fogeys into matches and start focusing on the younger talent.Nobody wanted to see Hogan and Piper anymore.all washed up old men. >:(

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: 80sRocked on 07/28/03 at 08:45 p.m.


Quoting:
I just wish that Vince would stop pushing the old fogeys into matches and start focusing on the younger talent.Nobody wanted to see Hogan and Piper anymore.all washed up old men. >:(

Howard
End Quote




its all about ratings.

Think about it: when you think of wrsetling, what do you think of?  Simple:  Hulk Hogan, and guys from his era, like Rowdy Roddy Piper.  And hell, even Vince McMahon himself was from the Hulk Hogan era.

Those guys were the pinnacle of wrestling, and they are icons in the sport.

When you need ratings and viewers, what do ya do?  You bring back old fogies who used to bring in the fans.  I just don't know if people are buying into it anymore.  But judging by the weekly TV raings, I think they are.


Side Note:  I got to give it to good ol' Hulk Hogan, he's the epitome of the phrase "staying power", and is known by virtually everyone.  I mean how could you not like "The Real American" (his original theme song).  For a man that is in serious need of a bra these days, he's truly an American Icon. :)

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 07/29/03 at 07:16 p.m.


Quoting:



its all about ratings.

Think about it: when you think of wrsetling, what do you think of?  Simple:  Hulk Hogan, and guys from his era, like Rowdy Roddy Piper.  And hell, even Vince McMahon himself was from the Hulk Hogan era.

Those guys were the pinnacle of wrestling, and they are icons in the sport.

When you need ratings and viewers, what do ya do?  You bring back old fogies who used to bring in the fans.  I just don't know if people are buying into it anymore.  But judging by the weekly TV raings, I think they are.


Side Note:  I got to give it to good ol' Hulk Hogan, he's the epitome of the phrase "staying power", and is known by virtually everyone.  I mean how could you not like "The Real American" (his original theme song).  For a man that is in serious need of a bra these days, he's truly an American Icon. :)
End Quote



Yeah,that true.But,after a while,you would get tired of hearing it Thursday after Thursday.Mr America was part of his gimmick and it just got tiring.

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: 80sRocked on 07/29/03 at 07:44 p.m.


Quoting:


Yeah,that true.But,after a while,you would get tired of hearing it Thursday after Thursday.Mr America was part of his gimmick and it just got tiring.

Howard
End Quote



yes thats true.  I was just saying that its a standard practice in show-biz.  When the ratings are falling, bring back what used to bring the ratings.  In this case:  Hulk Hogan and a few other fogies.

Bad thing is though, that gimmick only lasts a short while,then they have to go to Plan B.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 07/30/03 at 05:54 p.m.

I want to ask everyone what are your top five wrestling matches of all time?  :)

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: BLO-TOWN on 07/31/03 at 10:39 a.m.


Quoting:
I want to ask everyone what are your top five wrestling matches of all time?  :)
End Quote



1.Shawn Michaels vs. Razor Ramon at SummerSlam or something like that when they had that ladder match

2. Mankind vs. Undertaker in their first Hell in A Cell match

3. Shawn Michaels vs. Triple H at SummerSlam as HBK's first match back

4. Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart at Wrestlemainia in the Ironman match

5. It wasn't a match but when D-X would imitate the Nation of Domination is just classic

I could go on and on...

I think the reason wrestling has gone down is because there is no variety since Vince bought wcw. that's why every month he has to bring someone back like Piper, HBK, Nash, Sable ,ect. Damn Nash is going gray like he's 60.  

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 07/31/03 at 04:07 p.m.

Quoting:
1.Shawn Michaels vs. Razor Ramon at SummerSlam or something like that when they had that ladder matchEnd Quote



I guess you're a Shawn Michaels fan, right? Shawn/Razor had two ladder matches. Their famous one at Wrestlemania 10 and at Summerslam '95. Would you believe Bret 'The Hitman' Hart started the ladder match? I think he used the stipulation on his dad's Stampede wrestling organisation. From there, he and Shawn had the first ladder match I believe in 92/93.

Quoting:2. Mankind vs. Undertaker in their first Hell in A Cell match End Quote



A great choice! The infamous 'King of the Ring' when Mankind fell off the top of the cage! Apparently, the part when the Undertaker choke-slammed Mankind through the cell wasn't planned.

Quoting:3. Shawn Michaels vs. Triple H at SummerSlam as HBK's first match backEnd Quote



It was alright, nothing special. Shawn v Mankind at In your house 'Mind games' was much better!

Quoting:4. Shawn Michaels vs Bret Hart at Wrestlemainia in the Ironman matchEnd Quote



Everybody seems to like this match, but I found it a very slow affair. It only heated up at the last 15 minutes of the match. I think I was also expecting more pins.

Quoting:I think the reason wrestling has gone down is because there is no variety since Vince bought wcw. that's why every month he has to bring someone back like Piper, HBK, Nash, Sable ,ect. Damn Nash is going gray like he's 60. End Quote


 
I think the main reason why wrestling has gone down the pan was because Vince McMahon got himself involved in feuds (around 1998/1999) with Steve Austen. Once he did that, there was no turning back. When wrestlers feud with other wrestlers the prize is for the WWE title, now they are feuding to become commissioners, owners of the federation and heck knows what - Wrestling can not get back to normal once those kind of stakes are put on the table.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 07/31/03 at 08:21 p.m.

I just wondered since Wrestlemania 20 is coming up,maybe that will be the final last Wrestlemania. cause you see,How many more Wrestlemanias can they're be? Vince has to do something.

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Kellykoop on 07/31/03 at 08:47 p.m.

I used to be a fan, but haven't really watched in the last few months.  Mainly because I'm sick of Triple H.  I don't find him interesting at all and I think his character is completely boring.  Also, it seems that they'll give another wrestler a push, they'll face HHH, the wrestler loses (of course) and the push seems to stop. (Case and point: RVD)  Anyway, that's my opinion.  ;D

From what I hear, Smackdown still seems to be good, but unfortunately, I have class on Thursday night.  I'm a big Kurt Angle and Brock Lesner fan.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/01/03 at 03:26 a.m.

Quoting:
I just wondered since Wrestlemania 20 is coming up,maybe that will be the final last Wrestlemania. cause you see,How many more Wrestlemanias can they're be? Vince has to do something.End Quote



I doubt Vince McMahon will change a money-spinner like 'Wrestlemania'. Besides, how many Superbowls have there been and it's still going?

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/01/03 at 03:29 a.m.

Quoting:
I used to be a fan, but haven't really watched in the last few months.  Mainly because I'm sick of Triple H.  I don't find him interesting at all and I think his character is completely boring.  Also, it seems that they'll give another wrestler a push, they'll face HHH, the wrestler loses (of course) and the push seems to stop. (Case and point: RVD)  Anyway, that's my opinion.  ;DEnd Quote



Smackdown is the better deal Kellyhoop. You tend to see more of a balanced card and more decisive match endings.

I totally agree with you regarding Triple H. I can never understand why he gets the exposure - he has an awful monotone voice, no charisma and one expression. RVD is the perfect example of a man getting the push only to be dropped again. If you want to see more RVD Kellyhoop, try to get hold of some ECW DVDs - he was amazing there!

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/01/03 at 07:08 p.m.


Quoting:


Smackdown is the better deal Kellyhoop. You tend to see more of a balanced card and more decisive match endings.

I totally agree with you regarding Triple H. I can never understand why he gets the exposure - he has an awful monotone voice, no charisma and one expression. RVD is the perfect example of a man getting the push only to be dropped again. If you want to see more RVD Kellyhoop, try to get hold of some ECW DVDs - he was amazing there!
End Quote



When you date The Boss's Daughter,you get all the exposure you want.

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/01/03 at 07:38 p.m.

Quoting:
When you date The Boss's Daughter,you get all the exposure you want.End Quote



If that is basically the crux of it, Howard then Vince is not the shrewd businessman I once would give him credit him for.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/02/03 at 09:55 a.m.

I think it's sad that if he brings back Doink The Clown full time the ratings will drop.seeing him wrestle Chris Benoit was just too funny.I never saw a clown get beat up as much as Doink did Thursday Night. ;D :D

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/02/03 at 07:57 p.m.

Quoting:
I think it's sad that if he brings back Doink The Clown full time the ratings will drop.seeing him wrestle Chris Benoit was just too funny.I never saw a clown get beat up as much as Doink did Thursday Night. ;D :D
End Quote



I'm sorry Howard. I didn't watch any telly last Thursday night. You're not telling me Doink was wrestling? If so, I think we can safely say that the time of the end for wrestling is nigh.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/03/03 at 01:35 p.m.


Quoting:


I'm sorry Howard. I didn't watch any telly last Thursday night. You're not telling me Doink was wrestling? If so, I think we can safely say that the time of the end for wrestling is nigh.
End Quote



I believe he was.Rhyno was talking about how Chris Benoit was a joke and then comes out Doink.Wrestling shouldn't be funny anymore.Whatever happened to the seriousness these days?

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/03/03 at 01:45 p.m.

Quoting:
I believe he was.Rhyno was talking about how Chris Benoit was a joke and then comes out Doink.Wrestling shouldn't be funny anymore.Whatever happened to the seriousness these days?End Quote



I think wrestling should allow you to think in lots of different ways, it should make you laugh, make you annoyed, make you sad and make you joyful - I don't believe WWE is actually doing that for me at the moment. All it gets from me is apathy.  :-/

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: 80sRocked on 08/03/03 at 03:25 p.m.

speaking of wrestling:  I happened to stumble onto WWE last night and saw that kid (I dont know his name) with only one leg?  Are WWE's ratings that bad that they have to bring out the one-legged wrestlers now?

I wonder what crowd they are trying to appeal to with him.  Because personally, I saw it as a sign of desperation on WWE's behalf.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/03/03 at 06:39 p.m.

Quoting:
speaking of wrestling:  I happened to stumble onto WWE last night and saw that kid (I dont know his name) with only one leg?  Are WWE's ratings that bad that they have to bring out the one-legged wrestlers now?

I wonder what crowd they are trying to appeal to with him.  Because personally, I saw it as a sign of desperation on WWE's behalf.End Quote



I agree totally, 80sRocked. Zack Gowan was wrestling Shannon Moore (I think). I didn't know what to make of it. I find it ironical since Jim Ross often used the phrase 'he's getting beaten like a one legged man in a butt-kicking contest'.

I think Zack Gowan is nothing more than a over-developed 'shill' (this is a term that describes a person that is deliberately placed in the crowd so that the wrestlers can interact with him/her - usually in a negative manner i.e ripping up posters or having slanging matches with them). Initially, Zack was a shill (he interrupted the Roddy Piper/Mr America match after jumping the crowd barriers). But now this is getting a little ridiculous! I believe they are using Zack Gowan's missing leg as a gimmick - for that reason, I don't agree with it.

Besides, it's not clever to pretend that ordinary people are climbing crowd barriers because it implies that anybody can do it and interfere in a match (though it's happened before in a Chris Jericho and an Eddie Guerrero match. Of course, without the same results as Zack's all of a sudden career change to become a wrestler.

I believe the whole plot line smells of desperation. It's a shame.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 08/04/03 at 01:05 p.m.

sorry i havent posted anything in a while


thanks for the great responce  never expected this many  

okay getting back to topic
zack gown  was known in czw as  trent acid so he wasent brought in as a shill  mend you   it is a shame that the only gimmik they  chould come up with is to do with his handicap thats just sick  right of the backi hate triple hs guts  simply put  they have the oppujunerty of a life time with the crusert weghts  and  they are waisting valuble money  and  time on losers like  bigshowe a train   chuck billy ect wwe wake up and smell the roses crusers is what we want to say wrestling action  not soap like storylines  and triple h

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/04/03 at 05:31 p.m.

Quoting:sorry i havent posted anything in a while End Quote



Great to see you back on the boards, Mr Crowly.  :)

Quoting:zack gown  was known in czw as  trent acid so he wasent brought in as a shill  mend you   it is a shame that the only gimmik they  chould come up with is to do with his handicap thats just sick  right of the backi End Quote



Now you've taught me something Mr Crowly. I know of CZW and have seen great athletes like Amazing Red and Rick Blade (one of these are on NWA-TNA and I think it's only going to be time before they are introduced to the WWE). Some are 'mankind' style nutters like Lobo and Wifebeater. Did Trent Acid wrestle with two legs in CZW (it might seem like a daft question but you never know in wrestling).

Quoting:hate triple hs guts  simply put  they have the oppujunerty of a life time with the crusert weghts  and  they are waisting valuble money  and  time on losers like  bigshowe a train   chuck billy ect wwe wake up and smell the roses crusers is what we want to say wrestling action  not soap like storylines  and triple hEnd Quote



You've got that right. I can't believe A Train (who has been a loser since about 1998/99) and Big Show (been a loser since 99) have been given the push in Smackdown. I would much rather see Brock Lesnar against Rhyno!

I think the sooner they get rid of HHH the better. Talking of Raw, I saw Shane McMahon giving Kane a smacking. Without the mask, Kane's mystery is lost and so is my interest in him.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/04/03 at 07:08 p.m.

I think he has a good future ahead just maybe not title worthy yet.Next feud should be with A-Train,Matt Hardy or Doink The Clown....heehee! ;D

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 08/06/03 at 02:08 p.m.

bobby in recards to youre qusition  about zac gown  he always had one leg he had cancer befoer he got in the bussnes  he a very tallented guy iam impreesed with him and iam not just saying that because of his handi cap i honestly beleve that zac got bright future in the wwe concerderring the fact that vince gets  eyes cheaked  and actully watch this youngster in action when the cammara isnt  rolling and hes not his heel persona (you didnt actully belve that he like that in real life do you)  why on earth  did they have to bring back  doink the clown  that match remended me of the filler matches they  used to have on raw in the early 90s and all trough the 80s (in other words sq matches)  i can understand the joke  (no pun indended)  and all that but still it sucked  when are they gonna give rvd the big break he  deserves i mean  he was ecw champion for nearly a year and 1/2 for gods sake  and the wwe just waisting him so like many others ricky steamboat any one   how the hurracaine here we have this tallented  guy  he some awsome moves great ring speed awsome presons but the one thing  that got him nocetice by the script team is his name change hey i ve got an idea lets re visit the cartoon yrs of wrestling (tugboat kookoo b were ect) and make this guy a  comic hero  and the like what a way to use you re tallented wrestlers vince

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/06/03 at 03:59 p.m.

This might seem crazy but I think squash matches are effective because it makes the main wrestlers look more impressive and so makes you excited when you see them against another main wrestler. You knew that a lot of squash wrestlers like Tim Horner, Brooklyn Brawler, The Gambler, The Itallian Stallian and Rip Rogers would never make the grade but it makes wrestling more realistic.

I remember Sid Vicious (known as 'King of the squash match') throwing wrestlers around (literally) and it made him look so amazing, it was a shame that his Halloween Havoc match with Sting was marred with such pointless controversy. However, if they mixed squash matches up with P-P-V event calibre matches then Smackdown and Raw would have far less screw-jobs in them IMO.

If a squash wrestler develops, it makes his climb to the top that much more impressive - remember Bret Hart was a squash wrestler before he got his break.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/06/03 at 06:58 p.m.

with wrestling these days,nobody knows who's heel or face anymore.everyone just wants to cheer for the heels and boo the faces.Is anybody confused? I seem to kinda like John Cena cause he's funny AND Matt Hardy,out of respect that he's cool in a sort of way.

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/07/03 at 05:28 a.m.

Quoting:
with wrestling these days,nobody knows who's heel or face anymore.everyone just wants to cheer for the heels and boo the faces.Is anybody confused? I seem to kinda like John Cena cause he's funny AND Matt Hardy,out of respect that he's cool in a sort of way.End Quote



If there is no wrestler integrity, then the sport becomes stagnant and the crowd become apathetic - you know that if he turns face one minute, you don't care 'cause he'll turn heel the next.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 08/07/03 at 03:20 p.m.

jhon cena uses the best out of his rap gimmik what i mean is hes  great at it  remember mable god that suckd but cena proves that a rap gimmik can be a good thing  instaed of making youre life hell  (mable gave me nightmares for weeks i honestly beleve that mable was baced on  vanilla ice because he was atroushus  at it) as sq matches how the heack do they make wrestling rellistic it just proves  more and more that wrestling wer matches are concernd  is scripeted  take sid justuce (syco sid to everyone who dosent know that)  he was the master of the sq   if the sq boy in ? was to get more affence then so be it its relistic but having one guy  doing all the work whilst the jobber  is just standing there well doser sound rellistic to you  just my point of veiw

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/07/03 at 04:33 p.m.

Quoting:jhon cena uses the best out of his rap gimmik what i mean is hes  great at it  remember mable god that suckd but cena proves that a rap gimmik can be a good thing  instaed of making youre life hell  (mable gave me nightmares for weeks i honestly beleve that mable was baced on  vanilla ice because he was atroushus  at it)End Quote



The problem with Cena's gimmick (like Honky Tonk Man's) was that it makes the wrestler look like a charicature. The Honky Tonk Man, unlike Cena, relied a lot more on entertaining the crowd. Like him or hate him, he was one of the funniest guys going in the late 80s (with exception to perhaps 'Rowdy' Roddy Piper and 'Ravishing' Rick Rude).

As a footnote, Mable had a stupid name and was awful in whatever he did. I just don't know why the WWF kept him on the roster for so long.

Quoting:as sq matches how the heack do they make wrestling rellistic it just proves  more and more that wrestling wer matches are concernd  is scripeted  take sid justuce (syco sid to everyone who dosent know that)  he was the master of the sq   if the sq boy in ? was to get more affence then so be it its relistic but having one guy  doing all the work whilst the jobber  is just standing there well doser sound rellistic to you  just my point of veiwEnd Quote



It's a fine point of view, Mr Crowly. The squash wrestlers I mentioned put in a certain amount of offence (Rip Rogers gave the late 'Flyin'' Bryan Pillman a hard time, the 1-2-3 Kid was a jobber until he pulled the famous upset on Razor Ramon, The Itallian Stallian was always so close to getting a victory but narrowly missed every time and Barry Horrowitz was a jobber until he entered P-P-Vs for a short period between '95 and '96). Of course, there were some guys that didn't put up an offence and these were pointless (especially Gillberg in the WWF back in 98/99).

I'm not saying that the WWE should have squash matches all the time - especially the ones where big guys kill little ones without any offence (like WCW did in the late eighties/early nineties) just sometimes and I give three good reasons:

1. It gets an audience hyped up for when the main wrestler fights another main wrestler. I have got so angry when bigger wrestlers are throwing about little ones and this makes you want the face to win in a P-P-V even more. When a face beats a jobber, you are given assurance that this man can take on a bigger opponent (IMO).

2. It cuts down on the screw jobs and gives the main wrestler some credibility - showing the difference between a superstar and a normal athlete.

3. The 'jobbers' can be monitored by a scout team so that they can pick out the guys who think can make the grade. Those that put on a convincing performance night after night may go onto bigger things. This adds realism in that you can follow a wrestler's career from jobber to him winning the title at Wrestlemania. In a wrestling world devoted to handing belts over to wrestlers, a man actually fighting for the title may be a well deserved and satisfying novelty.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/07/03 at 06:57 p.m.


Quoting:


The problem with Cena's gimmick (like Honky Tonk Man's) was that it makes the wrestler look like a charicature. The Honky Tonk Man, unlike Cena, relied a lot more on entertaining the crowd. Like him or hate him, he was one of the funniest guys going in the late 80s (with exception to perhaps 'Rowdy' Roddy Piper and 'Ravishing' Rick Rude).

As a footnote, Mable had a stupid name and was awful in whatever he did. I just don't know why the WWF kept him on the roster for so long.


It's a fine point of view, Mr Crowly. The squash wrestlers I mentioned put in a certain amount of offence (Rip Rogers gave the late 'Flyin'' Bryan Pillman a hard time, the 1-2-3 Kid was a jobber until he pulled the famous upset on Razor Ramon, The Itallian Stallian was always so close to getting a victory but narrowly missed every time and Barry Horrowitz was a jobber until he entered P-P-Vs for a short period between '95 and '96). Of course, there were some guys that didn't put up an offence and these were pointless (especially Gillberg in the WWF back in 98/99).

I'm not saying that the WWE should have squash matches all the time - especially the ones where big guys kill little ones without any offence (like WCW did in the late eighties/early nineties) just sometimes and I give three good reasons:

1. It gets an audience hyped up for when the main wrestler fights another main wrestler. I have got so angry when bigger wrestlers are throwing about little ones and this makes you want the face to win in a P-P-V even more. When a face beats a jobber, you are given assurance that this man can take on a bigger opponent (IMO).

2. It cuts down on the screw jobs and gives the main wrestler some credibility - showing the difference between a superstar and a normal athlete.

3. The 'jobbers' can be monitored by a scout team so that they can pick out the guys who think can make the grade. Those that put on a convincing performance night after night may go onto bigger things. This adds realism in that you can follow a wrestler's career from jobber to him winning the title at Wrestlemania. In a wrestling world devoted to handing belts over to wrestlers, a man actually fighting for the title may be a well deserved and satisfying novelty.


End Quote



Rosey is also stupider especially as a moronic SuperHero. ::) :P

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/08/03 at 03:12 a.m.

Quoting:
Rosey is also stupider especially as a moronic SuperHero. ::) :P
End Quote



He's a superhero, now? Wow. The WWE know how to suspend belief don't they?

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/08/03 at 06:54 p.m.


Quoting:


He's a superhero, now? Wow. The WWE know how to suspend belief don't they?
End Quote




They sure know how to misuse wrestlers. ::)

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/09/03 at 07:04 a.m.

Quoting:
They sure know how to misuse wrestlers. ::)
End Quote



LOL. A great example of this happened in WCW. The guy known as 'Hugh Morrus' was ranting on about how the writers have screwed his chance of winning a belt because he wasn't taken seriously. So he decided to call himself something more sensible like 'Hugh G Rection' (work it out).  ;)

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/09/03 at 10:05 a.m.


Quoting:


LOL. A great example of this happened in WCW. The guy known as 'Hugh Morrus' was ranting on about how the writers have screwed his chance of winning a belt because he wasn't taken seriously. So he decided to call himself something more sensible like 'Hugh G Rection' (work it out).  ;)
End Quote



And Bobby Don't forget...Bill DeMott ???

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/09/03 at 01:43 p.m.

Quoting:
And Bobby Don't forget...Bill DeMott ???
End Quote



Actually, Howard that is his real name.  :)

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/10/03 at 12:11 a.m.


Quoting:


Actually, Howard that is his real name.  :)
End Quote



Yeah,I know that.I kinda liked his bully gimmick.too bad it just flopped big time.nobody even cared for that gimmick anyhow. ???

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/10/03 at 03:04 p.m.

Quoting:
Yeah,I know that.I kinda liked his bully gimmick.too bad it just flopped big time.nobody even cared for that gimmick anyhow. ???End Quote



Oh ok.  :)

He had a bully gimmick? The only person I know to have had a 'bully' gimmick was 'Big' Bully Busick around 1991. He debuted between Summerslam 91, by Survivor Series 91 he was dropped.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Owzat on 08/11/03 at 06:19 a.m.

I watched WWF many moons ago and it became dire when the real entertainers left - Hulk Hogan, Junkyard Dog, The Heart Foundation, The British Bulldogs.........

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/11/03 at 07:46 p.m.


Quoting:
I watched WWF many moons ago and it became dire when the real entertainers left - Hulk Hogan, Junkyard Dog, The Heart Foundation, The British Bulldogs.........
End Quote



things are not the same anymore,Ozwat.I miss the classic times :(

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/12/03 at 04:36 p.m.

It's a shame that so many wrestling entertainers have died. Mr Perfect, Junkyard Dog etc. For the curious, here is a list of dead wrestlers. Remember to scroll down until you get the list.

http://www.garywill.com/wrestling/decwres.htm

I remember the unsung heros like Greg 'The Hammer' Valentine (famous for clocking up over 50 minutes in a Royal Rumble), Tito Santana (who entered every Wrestlemania from 1 to 8 - admittedly I think he lost 7 matches) and 'Hacksaw' Jim Duggan (WWF from 1987 - 1993).

Even though Greg and Tito have held the Tag and Intercontinental titles, they are not reknowned for being that. They were tough guys (I laughed at Gorilla Monsoon who said of Greg; 'It takes him 60 minutes to get warmed up')that adapted from the older tougher generation to the Rock 'n' Wrestle generation of the mid 80s.

'Hacksaw' was one of those guys that never won a title (a bit like Jake Roberts, Hercules and Koko B Ware . . .) but was so obliviously optimistic. These days, a wrestler would rarely crack a smile but Jim would always give a wide 'HHHHOOOOOO' and wave his two-by-four in the air.

We need more wrestlers that make us feel good. Wrestling is too negative at the moment. I also know that Koko B Ware, Tito Santana and Hacksaw Jim Duggan have remained faces through their WWF tenure. That's Jim smiling through 7 years, Koko for 6 and Tito being adored by the crowd for at least 8! HHH and Brock Lesnar would have problems sticking to one frame of mind for a month!  >:(

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/12/03 at 07:04 p.m.

Not many wrestlers out there make you feel good.

ray mysterio jr.
billy gunn
tori
nidia
billy kidman
kurt angle

Guys who make you feel good. I guess. ???

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/13/03 at 04:03 a.m.

I reckon Rey Misterio Jnr is the closest. I can't see him turning into a heel in the next year or so, regardless of whether he wrestles Ultimo Dragon (which I reckon will be a possibility).

I would hope that if they wrestled, it would have a similar ending to the 'Bret Hart/'Roddy Piper' match at Wrestlemania 8.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 08/13/03 at 07:09 p.m.


Quoting:
I reckon Rey Misterio Jnr is the closest. I can't see him turning into a heel in the next year or so, regardless of whether he wrestles Ultimo Dragon (which I reckon will be a possibility).

I would hope that if they wrestled, it would have a similar ending to the 'Bret Hart/'Roddy Piper' match at Wrestlemania 8.
End Quote



I heard that Ultimo Dragon has been givin' the walking papers.Vince says he's not too happy with him fitting him in the WWF's hardcore style.So he left.Vince is very picky! ::)

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 08/14/03 at 04:17 p.m.

Quoting:
I heard that Ultimo Dragon has been givin' the walking papers.Vince says he's not too happy with him fitting him in the WWF's hardcore style.So he left.Vince is very picky! ::)
End Quote



I reckon Vince is going to regret that. Even in the 'hardcore' ECW, they successfully used Rey Misterio (before he became famous), Super Crazy, Psicosis, Taka Michinoku and Tajiri (who, in my opinion had never looked better presented).

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 10/14/03 at 08:44 a.m.

iam back     baby yeagh   i agree with u on the ecw thing bobby but tajirie looking good in wwe when he first came  in the wwe he was giving the rule of regals servent simmaler to virgils gimmik they only recently gave him the cruser belt which i thinks sucks because he and rey misterio and other out of state wrestlers  ( sorry if that sounds racist but i cant think of the name to say for non ameracan wrestlers) they were all headliners in the japans companys  mexco they are so great atlets and to me the cruserweigt belt  isa mid carder they need  a higher belt then ill be happy one of the biggest cases in unbderused wrestlers is jericho   the  wwe running his carrer down the drain  he was the first ever undisputed champion ( he won it at vengence which kinda sucked)  but was never givin the same treatment as trtiple h or the rock or steve austun   jerico push was made out to be nothing  this guy is next to bret hear and own heart as the greatist wrestler of all time  hes a great heel but the wwe  is making him out to be a joke   hell wcw did a better job than vince in using crish right   it starded of great with the classic angle with the rock  but it all went down hill  u know why that is because  vinces son in law  hates jerhcos guts and feelings mutal  on both sides  ther used to be a rule  where the company cannot let personal people get in the way of the company gusse that went out the window   ther is one thing thats true its true when they say the wwe  is family entertainment . dose vince mc mhan have something against canadians if u dont know what i mean  plese say and ill explain it

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Child_of_the_80s on 10/14/03 at 10:53 a.m.

Ever since the WWE has controlled the wrestling market wrestling has gone down.The WWE has no idea of using their talent they have.I used to be a die hard wrestling fan now I'll just watch it if I have nothing else to do.One problem is that there are too many champions and it seems like the champions hold on to the belts for a short period of time.I like to see the champion hold on to their belt for at least 6 months.Nowadays its obvious that every pay per view that the belt will change hands.Pay per view is another problem I remember there would be 4 pay per views a year now it seeems like 4 pay per views a week!In my day the wrestlers werent as ripped as the are today but man could they give the best interviews like Dusty Rhodes.LOL!Only the Rock has real interview skills.I could just go on and on on how wrestling just sucks nowadays.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 10/14/03 at 05:16 p.m.

Quoting:
hell wcw did a better job than vince in using crish right   it starded of great with the classic angle with the rock  but it all went down hill  u know why that is because  vinces son in law  hates jerhcos guts and feelings mutal End Quote



Again, I am no promoter of the now dead ECW, but they did a great job of using Chris Jericho before he entered WCW - and he was a face then!

One highlight was a terrific house-show match with Sabu. I have not seen him have a match like that in both WCW and WWF/E.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 10/14/03 at 05:35 p.m.

Quoting:One problem is that there are too many champions and it seems like the champions hold on to the belts for a short period of time.I like to see the champion hold on to their belt for at least 6 months.End Quote



Triple H had held onto the WWE World title for what seemed to be like forever only to lose it recently to Goldberg.

Quoting:Nowadays its obvious that every pay per view that the belt will change hands.Pay per view is another problem I remember there would be 4 pay per views a year now it seeems like 4 pay per views a week!In my day the wrestlers werent as ripped as the are today but man could they give the best interviews like Dusty Rhodes.LOL!Only the Rock has real interview skills.I could just go on and on on how wrestling just sucks nowadays.
End Quote



The P-P-V every month was started by WCW (funded by the inexhaustable Ted Turner). WWF had to keep up with that and so decided to create the 'In Your House' Series which then evolved into Backlash, Armageddon and the like. I prefer Wrestlemania but I am partial to The Royal Rumble (if only the results were less predictable).

Ha ha! Dusty Rhodes was very confident on the mic but the WWF screwed around with his image, making him wear polka dots and the like. In one interview Dusty mentioned that he had no problem with this development but I heard somewhere that this was Vince's way of punishing Rhodes for some misdemeanour or other - don't quote me on that though.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 10/14/03 at 07:36 p.m.

wrestling will continue to suck unless Vince does something bout'it! >:(


Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: bj26 on 10/15/03 at 09:57 a.m.

What do you think of HHH losing the championship to Goldberg who many believe to be the greatest wrestler.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 10/15/03 at 10:07 a.m.

the only reson triple h droped the belt was because he was going to be in a movie i have a this strong beleve that  if the movie wasent in the picture (no pun) that he whouldnt have lost it   goldberg a waist of time i must amit that i enjoyed his match with jerhco at badblood  it wasernt 5* classic but it was one of th e two best matches on show other being hbk vs ric flair  going to page 2 i think of the theread howard mentiond  something about bring back  old wrestler to be honest i agree but  100% but whouldnt it be graet to see ricky the dragon staem boat vs kurtangle that whould be awsome  smackdown getting better  bork lesnerer is heel again whoooo  is it me or is stephs  gunns if u know what i mean getting bigger lol

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Child_of_the_80s on 10/15/03 at 11:58 a.m.

One of the things I dont miss about the good ol' days of wrestling was Vince McMahon as an announcer and his bias towards the fan favorites.Hes much better as the "evil owner"

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: bj26 on 10/15/03 at 12:03 a.m.

I think another reason HHH lost the belt was due to Goldberg's jackhammer and spear.  HHH is great but Goldberg is da man!

Quoting:
the only reson triple h droped the belt was because he was going to be in a movie i have a this strong beleve that  if the movie wasent in the picture (no pun) that he whouldnt have lost it   End Quote

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 10/15/03 at 07:17 p.m.


Quoting:
One of the things I dont miss about the good ol' days of wrestling was Vince McMahon as an announcer and his bias towards the fan favorites.Hes much better as the "evil owner"
End Quote



Vince McMahon is on Tv too much now.He was better sitting at the announcer's table back in the early 90's.

Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: RockandRollFan on 10/15/03 at 07:19 p.m.


Quoting:
Macho Pigs wearing tight shorts grabbing each other everywhere...mmmm.. Goldberg has a new move called the "Than-FranThisco Treat"  ::)
End Quote

As I said before!

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 10/16/03 at 02:52 a.m.

I agree with everything Mr Crowly said apart from the match-up between Ricky Steamboat V Kurt Angle. As much as it looks good on paper, Ricky Steamboat has been out of wrestling for at least 10 years. He will have a lot of ring rust.

For me, Goldberg is a wasted talent. It seems that the WWE put him in a ring and expect him to produce the goods - and how many times will we see a missed spear go through the people's barrier before he leaves the WWE?

One of the worst wrestlers right now is (I wouldn't have said this 10 years ago) Scott Steiner. He is an absolute waste of time who develops stupid catchphrases and wears a stupid thing that looks like chain-mail on his head before a match!

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: OwnBuldgHakPrfct03 on 10/20/03 at 05:50 a.m.

IF THERE'S ANYTHING I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT WWE IS THE TLC MATCHES ARE CLASSIC MATCHES. THE HARDYZ,EDGE AND CHRISTIAN,AND THE DUDDLEYS WERE AWSOME BUT JUST MAYBE IF THEY GET THE NEW COMMERS IN TEAMS AND ADDED THEM, I WONDER HOW'D THEY DO IN A MATCH WITH VETERANS LIKE THOSE WHO STARTED TLC? ALSO BRING BACK JEFF HE'S THE MOST TALENTED WRESTLER IN HIS DIVISION SINCE SHAWN MICHAELS.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 10/21/03 at 01:58 a.m.

Quoting:
IF THERE'S ANYTHING I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT WWE IS THE TLC MATCHES ARE CLASSIC MATCHES. THE HARDYZ,EDGE AND CHRISTIAN,AND THE DUDDLEYS WERE AWSOME BUT JUST MAYBE IF THEY GET THE NEW COMMERS IN TEAMS AND ADDED THEM, I WONDER HOW'D THEY DO IN A MATCH WITH VETERANS LIKE THOSE WHO STARTED TLC? ALSO BRING BACK JEFF HE'S THE MOST TALENTED WRESTLER IN HIS DIVISION SINCE SHAWN MICHAELS.
End Quote



For me, the best TLC match was at Summerslam 2000. I have never seen so many tables being broken! Plus the classic ending where two people were hanging from the belt attachment - that's great!

Yes - Bring back Jeff Hardy. Give him a decent style, don't degrade him and give him a match against Rey Misterio Jnr.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: NullandVoid on 10/21/03 at 02:15 p.m.

Wrestiling is dumb now. Although I have watched it for YEARS, my younger brother is an avid fan(for some reason). Last night he filled me in on some story involving a war with the Mcmahons and something about their mom getting body slammed and having her neck broken. I just laughed and said is this a sport or a soap opera on steriods?? ???

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: mr_crowly on 11/18/03 at 09:37 a.m.

i whish all the mc mans whouyld be shot dead on tv (in storyline)  and leve the wrestlers to get on with ther job  i cans stand it  ther egos is to big for theirs heads  tlc matches  let me just say right off the  bat i hate hardcore matches  i really do   i prefer high flyers luchadores technicle and submission wrestling  to entertain me  in saying that i love ecw because they were creative with it  but with vinces rules  on baning moves that  need to be  part of the wrestling   the wwe hardcore mtaces are crap  the tlcs were awsome  but vince is killing his own company and why  to make life easier for his on in law  anyone elese think  that velocity is the best plce for  highflyers i think it is because it they can wrestle ther own speed  do ther trademarks moves  ( theres no way in hell that vince whould alow paul london to do his dropsault ) i think velocity should have a ppv on its own here my line of matches
ultimodragon  vs spanky
paul london vs nova
loky vs aj styles
amazing red vs  jerry lyn
thoser matches alone gimmik free whopuld be enougfh action to  quist my hunger

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 11/18/03 at 04:20 p.m.

The problem with the hardcore division in the WWE was that it wasn't taken seriously. It was just a couple of guys using props against each other in the most banal way possible. Since the title was merely a battered and plastered up version of the old WWF belt, it made fighting so hard for it pointless.

ECW invented Rob Van Dam's Vandaminator and furthermore developed the Vanterminator (Shane McMahon's move were he flew across the ring from the top to hit his opponent hung up in the turnbuckles with a chair across his face). ECW's Public Enemy made up the idea of putting wrestlers through tables and not The Dudley Boys - who made a habit of it in ECW before bringing the idea to the WWE.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 11/18/03 at 06:37 p.m.

At least now,they're pushing Kane to the moon.first his brother Undertaker and now Goldberg! ;D


Howard

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Bobby on 11/19/03 at 03:45 a.m.

Does anybody here like 'The Legend-Killer' Randy Orton? I go to a certain site and they adore him.

I think he is a waste of space for two reasons:

He gets helped out an awful lot in his matches (usually by fellow members of Evolution)

His work-rate is terrible. He doesn't go the extra mile to secure his status.

Subject: Re: the state of wrestling

Written By: Howard on 11/19/03 at 06:41 p.m.


Quoting:
Does anybody here like 'The Legend-Killer' Randy Orton? I go to a certain site and they adore him.

I think he is a waste of space for two reasons:

He gets helped out an awful lot in his matches (usually by fellow members of Evolution)

His work-rate is terrible. He doesn't go the extra mile to secure his status.
End Quote



Randy Orton is alright.maybe he should turn face or something. ???


Howard