» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society

Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.

If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.

Custom Search



Subject: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Kenlos on 04/29/03 at 07:22 a.m.

There was an Earthquake this morning in eastern Alabama that was felt throughout most of the southeast and as far north as southern Ohio.  The earthquake registered at 4.9 on the Richter Scale.  I realise that a on the West Coast at 4.9 is not much of anything but for people in the southest where we almost never have earthquakes its unusual.  Unfortunitly I slept through it because it came through around 5am, I have talked to several people it did wake up though.  No deaths or damage has been reported but I just thought it was interesting.  

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: cs on 04/29/03 at 07:28 a.m.

WOW!  Is there a fault running through there?

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: princessofpop on 04/29/03 at 07:31 a.m.

I am glad you are okay Kenlos.  I think the worst weather I have ever experienced was a few Hurricane's...I can't imagine being in an Earthquake!  That would freak me out because it's so random!  At least with a Hurricane or a tornado you can be somewhat alerted & prepared.  :-/

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Kenlos on 04/29/03 at 07:34 a.m.

I know there a several small faults around here in North Georgia so I assume there are some smaller ones in Eastern Alabama, but usually any earthquakes that come from those are too small to even feel but this one was much stronger and you could definitly feel it.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Kenlos on 04/29/03 at 07:38 a.m.

Quoting:
I am glad you are okay Kenlos.  I think the worst weather I have ever experienced was a few Hurricane's...I can't imagine being in an Earthquake!  That would freak me out because it's so random!  At least with a Hurricane or a tornado you can be somewhat alerted & prepared.  :-/
End Quote



I have only been in one Hurricane and that was Opal which is an experince I wont forget.  I sleep through the earthquake but I have talked to people who woke up to their beds shaking and things on their shelves rattling and things like that.  I kind of wish it had woke me up cause I think it would have been cool to experience one that was strong enough to feel but not strong enough to do any real damage.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Davester on 04/29/03 at 12:35 a.m.

  Doesn't the New Madrid fault run through your neck-'o-the-woods?  North/South?  Supposedly a larger though less active fault than the San Andreas in California.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Kenlos on 04/29/03 at 12:57 a.m.

The New Madrid fault is in Missouri and Arkansas near the boarder of Tennessee and Kentucky if I remember correctly, but from what I know of the faults around here are in the same fault system.  I am not sure if it is less active or not, but I do know that it rarely produces Earthquakes to the effect of the ones in California.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Davester on 04/29/03 at 01:08 p.m.


Quoting:
The New Madrid fault is in Missouri and Arkansas near the boarder of Tennessee and Kentucky if i remember correctly, but from what I know of the faults around here are in the same fault system.  I am not sure if it is less active or not, but I do know that it rarely produces Earthquakes to the effect of the ones in California.
End Quote



  Having lived in Southern Illinois for a few years I was always reminded that, though less seismically active, when the BIGGUN came, it would be devestating.  The death toll, I assume, would be mitigated in such an event due to the sparseness of population as opposed to say, L.A. or the California Bay Area.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Kenlos on 04/29/03 at 01:17 p.m.

Quoting:


  Having lived in Southern Illinois for a few years I was always reminded that, though less seismically active, when the BIGGUN came, it would be devestating.  The death toll, I assume, would be mitigated in such an event due to the sparseness of population as opposed to say, L.A. or the California Bay Area.
End Quote



According to a site about the New Madrid fault I just looked at the last Earthquake above 6.0+ was 1895 and the last Earthquake above 8.0+ was 1811/1812.  The site also said that the area is due for another 6.0+ because those usually happen every 80 years and its been over 80s years since the last one.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: DJ Midas on 04/30/03 at 07:36 a.m.

Glad to hear you are okay, Kenlos.

I slept through a 5.9 earthquake in California July '86.  Woke up five minutes afterwards...

I have gone through a really bad hurricane, Fran in Sept 1996.  Blew two hours inland to Raleigh NC.  I stayed at my wife's (then girlfriend's) place that night as my apartment was on the top floor and thought we would be safer on lower ground (her room was in her basement of her mother's place) and about 4 a.m. the dog woke us up and we were knee deep in water.  Mrs. M lost pretty much everything she owned - clothes, photos, yearbooks etc.  It took a while for her to recover and rebuild.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: cs on 04/30/03 at 07:39 a.m.


Quoting:


  Having lived in Southern Illinois for a few years I was always reminded that, though less seismically active, when the BIGGUN came, it would be devestating.  The death toll, I assume, would be mitigated in such an event due to the sparseness of population as opposed to say, L.A. or the California Bay Area.
End Quote


Well, that's something to look forward too!  YIKES! :-/

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Wicked Lester on 04/30/03 at 06:04 p.m.

And another tremor in NE Arkansas just a little while ago. 4.0 on the Richter... am I next?  :o

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Kenlos on 04/30/03 at 08:49 p.m.

Quoting:
And another tremor in NE Arkansas just a little while ago. 4.0 on the Richter... am I next?  :o
End Quote



Yeah I heard about that one too.  After the first earthquake yesturday I read an article, I think it was on weather.com, that a guy said that the earthquake could have been a sign of more to come.  Looks like he might have been right.

Subject: Re: Earthquake in the Southeast

Written By: Shaz on 04/30/03 at 08:59 p.m.


Quoting:
And another tremor in NE Arkansas just a little while ago. 4.0 on the Richter... am I next?  :o
End Quote



Hey it is bad enough I have to deal with tornadoes, keep that stuff over there!!  :o