I've tried to leave it unrestricted, but there's too many people who don't seem to understand that the signature field is not for 3 or 6 images.

maximum height is now 160 pixels.  anything else is cut off.  The board will not resize it for you, it consumes too much processor power to have to resize everyone's images for them.

Thank you Chucky.  One or two were beginning to annoy me

Ditto ! It was driving me nuts scrolling through all those huge images trying to read a thread.

I'm with Karen and Gis too, it's great that sigs have been reduced - I still wish I knew how to get a (one) pic in my sig tho'  ;D ;D

I agree with all of the above. Thanks, Chucky.





Cat

I don't use any humongous sig pictures, so I approve of the sig size restriction as well. ;)

short signatures are the best.  I mean why do you need to lave large pictures and all kinds of junk in your signature?

[quote author=wһіѕ

I'm with Karen and Gis too, it's great that sigs have been reduced - I still wish I knew how to get a (one) pic in my sig tho'   ;D ;D


if you want to get a pic in your sig, just do it like you would normally post a pic in the forum.  ie:  {img}http://www.website.com/image.jpg{/img}

change the { } brackets around the IMG to though :)




Because some people want to.  If you don't like the picture and are using Firefox, you can always right-click and block the image.  That way whenever you see that person's posts, you don't see the image.


True about blocking the image, but it's just doesn't feel the same.  I was once a member of a messageboard where  everyone had signatures that had lots of animated gifs and giant pictures in them, which took up alot of bandwidth and webspace, so eventually the admin there made it so if you wanted a signature, you had to donate money to the site on a monthly basis.

Large signatures are not a good idea.  Who knows, Chucky might start charging for signatures (I'm only kidding.  Chucky, please don't get any ideas from this) ;D