...and others who feel the need to start a political blog under every political parody they see: don't bother. The comments section under the parodies is to leave feedback FOR THE PARODIES.

"The parody authors spend a lot of time writing parodies for website. They appreciate feedback in the form of votes and comments. Please take some time to leave a comment below about this parody."

~~~~~~and~~~~~~

"Comments are subject to review, and can be removed by the administration of the site at any time and for any reason."

If your comments don't pertain to the parody in any way, shape, or form, they will be deleted, simple as that.

Ant

...and others who feel the need to start a political blog under every political parody they see: don't bother. The comments section under the parodies is to leave feedback FOR THE PARODIES.

"The parody authors spend a lot of time writing parodies for website. They appreciate feedback in the form of votes and comments. Please take some time to leave a comment below about this parody."

~~~~~~and~~~~~~

"Comments are subject to review, and can be removed by the administration of the site at any time and for any reason."

If your comments don't pertain to the parody in any way, shape, or form, they will be deleted, simple as that.

Ant


Why was the relatively recent "rob" singled out in the title, with "and others" parenthetically added inside? Michael Pacholek has been doing the same thing for years. (Do you really want me to post examples?) I've  never complained about them. Reply or ignore. Political parodies will bring political comments. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of sentences to refute an entire parody's worth of what is perceived as erroneous thinking. Leave these things up and let readers judge for themselves. ...  unless, of course, it gets off of politics itself and into direct personal, profane, or hateful attack on the person him/herself. But your post addressed only political commentary. "Let it be." (on *all* sides.)

Why was the relatively recent "rob" singled out in the title, with "and others" parenthetically added inside? Michael Pacholek has been doing the same thing for years. (Do you really want me to post examples?) I've  never complained about them. Reply or ignore. Political parodies will bring political comments. Sometimes it takes more than a couple of sentences to refute an entire parody's worth of what is perceived as erroneous thinking. Leave these things up and let readers judge for themselves. ...  unless, of course, it gets off of politics itself and into direct personal, profane, or hateful attack on the person him/herself. But your post addressed only political commentary. "Let it be." (on *all* sides.)


I am not against political commentary (of either side, or the middle), but the comments by "rob" have had no bearing whatsoever on the parody content. In short, writing "Obama sucks", "Bush sucks" or " party sucks", in longer, slightly more eloquent and wordier variations, over and over again, is tantamount to spam. I treat it in the same way I treat those a-holes from China who constantly spam trying to sell Ugg Boots, which is to say not very kindly.

"and others" was addressing any potential copycats, or those who leave, have left, or may leave comments in a similar fashion to what "rob" does.

Rob was singled out because, at this time, he (I assume Rob is not short for "Roberta") is the only person making such comments, and to my knowledge does not have an account here nor is an active writer on AmiRight.  In this case, complaints were made. I could not resolve them through normal channels, thus this thread.

Ant