» OLD MESSAGE ARCHIVES «
The Pop Culture Information Society...
Messageboard Archive Index, In The 00s - The Pop Culture Information Society
Welcome to the archived messages from In The 00s. This archive stretches back to 1998 in some instances, and contains a nearly complete record of all the messages posted to inthe00s.com. You will also find an archive of the messages from inthe70s.com, inthe80s.com, inthe90s.com and amiright.com before they were combined to form the inthe00s.com messageboard.
If you are looking for the active messages, please click here. Otherwise, use the links below or on the right hand side of the page to navigate the archives.
Custom Search
This is a topic from the More Than a Decade forum on inthe00s.
Subject: Decades that "started late"
Written By: Mat1991 on 09/17/11 at 4:29 pm
By that, I mean decades that took longer than usual to construct its own distinct identity from the decade that preceded it. For example, some say that the 1960s as we know it today didn't really begin until 1964, and that the first three years of the '60s were basically continuations of the '50s.
With that in mind, which other decades do you think took long to develop its own identity?
Subject: Re: Decades that "started late"
Written By: the OlLine Rebel on 09/17/11 at 6:27 pm
It's true of all decades.
True "culture" of a "decade" is actually probably more 'X3-'X2, or as you stated 'X4-